'It’s helping save lives' | Vehicles will soon have built-in sensors to prevent drunk driving


INDIANAPOLIS — Researchers say they've figured out a way to practically eliminate drunk driving. They have developed alcohol detection sensors that will be soon be launched on American roads for the first time. And within a few years, the technology could be ready to install in the vehicles of millions of American drivers.

But are American drivers ready for the technology?

The question is now taking on new urgency as program developers prepare to license the sensors and Congress considers legislation that could make alcohol prevention technology mandatory in all new cars and trucks.

The potential impact of these sensors would be dramatic, with thousands of lives and billions of dollars at stake.

Out of the laboratory. Onto the highway.​

13News was among the first media outlets in the nation allowed inside the Boston-area lab where scientists are developing the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety, better known as DADSS. It’s where researchers have been teaching cars how to detect if a driver is legally drunk by using embedded sensors that measure a driver’s blood alcohol level. If that level is above a certain threshold, the car won’t start.

DADSS engineers are developing two different types of technology. The first captures your breath and pulls it into a sensor, where a beam of infrared light then calculates your precise blood alcohol concentration.

The second technology features a touch-based system built into a car's ignition button or gear shift. It uses tiny lasers to shine a beam of light onto your finger, and that special light reads the alcohol level below your skin's surface.

Unlike an ignition interlock system, which some courts mandate for convicted drunk drivers, the DADSS system does not require a driver to take specific actions. The system is designed to quietly and unobtrusively collect measurements.

“The challenge that we have is to measure alcohol content or blood alcohol concentration very accurately, very precisely and very fast,” explained Bud Zaouk, a DADSS program manager who gave 13News a behind-the-scenes tour of the research lab in 2015. “You have to do the measurement, the reading, and decision whether this person can move the vehicle or not move the vehicle very quickly. Our goal is less than half a second, 325 milliseconds to be specific -- less than the blink of an eye. The idea here is we do not want to inconvenience the driver.”

The above video is a promotional video from Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety demonstrates how the DADSS system works.

Since WTHR’s visit six years ago, researchers have been making the sensors smaller and more accurate. The technology, which has been in development for more than a decade, has now advanced to the point where it can soon be licensed for installation into commercial fleet vehicles. Later this year, trucking, bus and taxi companies will be able to use DADSS sensors in their vehicles to ensure their drivers are alcohol-free on the job.

“It’s a big deal because it’s the final corner we need to round towards ultimately being able to offer this technology to all consumers,” explained Rob Strassburger, president of the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS), a non-profit group that’s been developing the system along with the auto industry.
He said the group’s ultimate goal is to get the alcohol sensors into passenger cars within the next three years – and eventually into every vehicle produced to hopefully eliminate drunk driving deaths within our lifetime.

“That’s our biggest traffic safety problem and it’s eminently preventable,” Strassburger told 13News. “Our mission is to see the DADSS technology deployed as widely as possible as quickly as possible.”

Life-changing impact​


Pam Kelshaw holds a photo of her daughter, Silina, who was killed 19 years ago by a drunk driver.
The Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety has a large backing of supporters for its alcohol sensors. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has already spent about $50 million to help fund DADSS research, with 16 of the world’s largest automakers (including GM, Ford, Toyota, Honda, BMW and others) contributing another $50 million.

The type of technology developed by the DADSS program has also garnered support from many victims of drunk driving, who’ve expressed optimism that the alcohol sensors will significantly reduce the number of drunk driving fatalities that still plague communities every day. The United States records approximately 10,000 drunk driving deaths every year.

“It changes your life forever. It’s like waking up every day to your worst nightmare,” said Pam Kelshaw, who still vividly remembers the phone call she received 19 years ago to inform her that her family had been in a terrible crash.

Kelshaw’s family was returning from a shopping trip when another driver ran a stop sign near Noblesville High School. That driver, who was zooming through a school zone at more than 100 mph, crashed into the back of the family’s minivan. Kelshaw’s husband and son survived, but her 17-year-old daughter, Silina, died from massive injuries. Police discovered the speeding driver had also been drinking.

“When the police got him out of his car and told him he had to go to the hospital, he wanted to know what was going to happen to his beer. All he wanted to know: ‘what’s going to happen to my beer?’” Kelshaw said, recalling her conversations with investigators.

Kelshaw, who serves as the Indiana state director for Mothers Against Drunk Driving, believes more needs to be done to prevent these types of crashes and fatalities. MADD’s national president says technological advancements to reduce impaired driving are long overdue, and she hopes the federal government will mandate some type of technology in the near future.

“The lives it would save, the lives it would keep from changing irrevocably, that’s huge,” said MADD president Alex Otte. “I wish someone had put this in cars and put this in vehicles before so many victims and families came to our organization.”

Strassburger says ACTS has already been in contact with several companies that plan to license DADSS sensors in their fleet vehicles by the end of 2021.

Walking “a very fine line”​


The Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS) shared a photo of their Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety sensor.

But not everyone seems excited about mandated alcohol sensors in vehicles. Trade associations that represent trucking and rental car companies, two of the industries that can begin installing DADSS sensors later this year, told 13News they have heard little feedback from their members about the possibility of installing the new technology.

“A lot of our companies walk a very fine line about Big Brother watching [their drivers],” said Barbara Smithers, vice president of the Indiana Motor Truck Association, which advocates for the state’s trucking companies. “It would be hard for me to imagine a carrier would want to install this in all of their vehicles proactively, especially if they haven’t had any issues with their drivers.”
When contacted by WTHR, the American Car Rental Association did not have any comment on alcohol sensors in rental cars, although a spokesman did say “anything that makes renting a car safer for ACRA’s renters and the other motorists on the road is a good development.”

Some trade groups, such as the American Beverage Institute, have been outspoken critics of the DADSS program.

ABI, which promotes itself as a restaurant trade association dedicated to the protection of responsible on-premise consumption of adult beverages, says DADSS sensors are “unlikely to work perfectly,” resulting in drunk drivers still operating vehicles and sober drivers getting stranded. The organization questions whether alcohol detection sensors will be programmed to prohibit drinkers from operating a vehicle even when they are not legally intoxicated with a .08 blood alcohol concentration, “making it hard for most drivers to have a single drink before driving,” according to the ABI website.

Pam Kelshaw doesn’t buy that. The drunk driver who crashed into her family and killed her daughter had a BAC under the .08% legal limit.

“If you’re not drinking and driving, you don’t have a problem,” Kelshaw said. “It’s not an inconvenience. It’s helping save lives. We have to do something to stop this.”

Should alcohol sensors be mandatory in all vehicles?​


DADSS developers envision a steady progression that will make alcohol detection sensors more widely available over the coming decade. Providing the technology to companies that are eager to install the sensors into their fleets is the next step in that progression.

After that, DADSS sensors could be an optional piece of safety equipment offered by automakers looking to appeal to safety-conscious consumers. Appealing to parents who’d like a vehicle that won’t start if their teenage driver is under the influence of alcohol could be an attractive marketing pitch.
But some lawmakers believe the technology is too important to be considered optional.

Congress is considering two separate bills – the RIDE Act and HALT Act – that would both promote further development of advanced alcohol and impaired driving detection technology and mandate automakers to install that technology in new vehicles. Both have attracted bi-partisan support but face uphill battles in an increasingly partisan and divided Congress.

Supporters of the bills say utilizing technology to prevent drunk driving deaths is no different than mandating seat belts or airbags. And the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety released a 2020 study that found drunk driving prevention technologies could prevent more than 9,400 drunk driving deaths annually if made standard on all new vehicles.

“It is heartbreaking that we have lost so many to the irresponsible actions of drunk drivers, and it’s time to take real, significant action to prevent any further loss,” Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said earlier this year when he re-introduced the RIDE Act in the Senate.
Otte agrees.

“We support any kind of technological advancements that will lead to an end to drunk driving,” she told 13News. “It is 100% preventable and 100% avoidable.”
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Elim Garak and SCSI
That's retarded and dangerous even on a practical level. If someone who has had a beer has an emergency they require a car for, this is a problem. There's a million possible scenarios for that alone, such as a person being chased by a killer and needing to flee. But there's also the matter of abusing this technology on purpose; merely spike a woman's drink and she's trapped with a rapist.

To even consider this technology is unbelievably foolish.
 
Last edited:
So basically the breathalyzer that judges require habitual DUIs to install in their shitty cars, but in ALL shitty cars.

Demolition Man was supposed to be an action comedy not a God damn instruction manual. What's next, are we gonna get fined for swearing?

The Soviet Union had more personal freedoms than woke corporate America will. The irony is staggering.
 
This is mad triggering to former alcoholics. Can you imagine being having overcome addiction and being confronted with this every time you want to drive? #unwoke
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
The new draft states: "Alcohol is an intrinsic part of Australian culture and it plays a central role in most people's social lives."
Tell me its a lie considering getting pissed up and glassing a cunt is your nation's pastime it seems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
Nigga if you literally make a $40,000 new vehicle that I pay for and it kills my engine on the way home from a bar I will literally bring a gun to the factory and the dealership I bought it from and blow every person I encounters brains out, in Minecraft. It's my god given right as an American to drive drunk, until the cherries light up behind me.
 
Nigga if you literally make a $40,000 new vehicle that I pay for and it kills my engine on the way home from a bar I will literally bring a gun to the factory and the dealership I bought it from and blow every person I encounters brains out, in Minecraft. It's my god given right as an American to drive drunk, until the cherries light up behind me.
Honestly I'm not sure this would pass, law enforcement would not be able to meet their quota, for one. Most police encounters are vehicle related after all.

I guess this means that they'll have to arrest more minorities to compensate.
 
Apparently it's a computer algorithm that will decide if you are 'driving drunk' and take control of the car to pull it over by the side of the road.

So, completely bullshit vague technology that will be mandated and another Cash For Clunkers will come around, car prices will go up by $20K, and you'll be reminded that driving is a privilege not a right.

Which makes the sudden upsurge of all these "Car Culture!" assholes seem very very suspicious.

From here on out, anyone decrying the way America grew and embraces the automobile instead of goats, donkeys, and faggoty mass transportation will be looked at the same as a Communist.
 
Apparently it's a computer algorithm that will decide if you are 'driving drunk' and take control of the car to pull it over by the side of the road.
Can't wait for it take over when in the middle lane and I slam into a car driving fast up the side because the computer didn't detect it yet when it started to pull me over.

When will people realize that any computer control technology you can't override is a fucking terrible idea. How many goddamn times must this cliche be used in sci-fi for us to finally understand it.
 
Can't wait for it take over when in the middle lane and I slam into a car driving fast up the side because the computer didn't detect it yet when it started to pull me over.

When will people realize that any computer control technology you can't override is a fucking terrible idea. How many goddamn times must this cliche be used in sci-fi for us to finally understand it.
Because you have dipshits like MovieBob who thinks they just thought up the most amazing thing that nobody else has thought up.

Or you have other retards who think "Oh, those people just didn't know what they were making, they just weren't as smart as me, MY patented Baby Eating Death Robot AI surely won't eat any babies or kill anyone."

Basically, this:
nKCWbG.png
 
Install these first in all government vehicles, including city buses, school buses, cop cars, and miscellaneous three-letter-agencies first to prove it's workable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
Ok retards whats stopping someone from just buying an older car? Are you going to make all of those illegal too? Sounds accelerationist to me if all the poor people that require a car to get to their jobs all of a sudden have to lose those cars, their jobs, and get even poorer. Cash for clunkers? Yeah unless you plan on giving everyone 30k+ for their 2004 fagwagon you can forget about it.

Just the everyday news of the government making a unenforceable, braindead, and out of touch law at the behest of their corporate masters. The alcohol lobby will probably win this one though.
More people die each year from perfectly sober people speeding. I therefore propose a sensor that can determine the speed limit on any road by scanning the QR code on the signs, and throttle your car so you cannot go over that particular limit.

There, I just saved millions of lives. Now pay me.

edit: What are they gonna do about stoned/tweaking drivers? lolol
MADD has serious pull, they're basically a group of Karens but even more tyrannical.
You might laugh but I unironically think this is going to happen sometime in the future as cars get more "advanced", GPS can already tell you the speed limit of the road you're on, so it wouldn't really be that hard for a car to figure it out.

Can't wait for your self driving Tesla to force you to go the speed limit around every single little road. Oh you have an emergency? Who fucking cares peasant. You can't consoom product if you die. And we will make sure that never becomes a chance anytime soon
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak
Honestly I'm not sure this would pass, law enforcement would not be able to meet their quota, for one. Most police encounters are vehicle related after all.

I guess this means that they'll have to arrest more minorities to compensate.
You mean shoot more white people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
Because you have dipshits like MovieBob who thinks they just thought up the most amazing thing that nobody else has thought up.

Or you have other retards who think "Oh, those people just didn't know what they were making, they just weren't as smart as me, MY patented Baby Eating Death Robot AI surely won't eat any babies or kill anyone."
What happened to this classic?
latest
 
Back