J.K. Rowling needs to stop messing with Harry Potter - A general STFU J.K. Rowling MegaThread <3

Oh well, it was a shot hoping Rupert wouldn't say anything.

I do wonder what's going to happen next? Would people stop going to the Wizarding World of Harry Potter in Disney? Ban the books from the library, or burn their own copies? Tell their future kids, J.K is a terf and never read them her books for bedtime?


Or...everything remains more or less the same. This will pass, people will find someone new to hate on, and J.K. still continues to make more money than most people will ever make in her sleep.

G.G.

The book burning and banning would be quite ironic considering it was the religious right who did that when Harry Potter was new. It shows you that kids usually become like their parents one way or another.
 
The book burning and banning would be quite ironic considering it was the religious right who did that when Harry Potter was new. It shows you that kids usually become like their parents one way or another.
As the saying goes, if both sides hate you, you're doing something right (or you're an absolute douche).

Normal people won't mind Jo's words, though. They only want to consume (in a normal, healthy way, not "consoome") the product, enjoy it, and move on. It's only in social media where people are this autistic.

Also, the trans and trans-activists are close to what? 1%?
 
Now this is shitposting (?) :
fdgfdg.png
 
That's the same thing I see Chris Evans do all the time on Twitter. It's weird seeing actors take on traits of their most famous roles or just outright LARP as that character to maintain some kind of relevance. It's probably worse with Emma Watson given that she grew up playing Hermione and probably internalized alot of her character traits. Makes me wonder if J.K. regrets giving Hermione her activist traits at all. Either way, it's oddly funny and cathartic to see an author have their creation manifest in the real world, only for it to turn against her.
Martin Sheen also used to do this during the Bush/WoT years.
 
I stopped caring about JK Rowling after she said that wizards never invented indoor plumbing.

One book in the HP series is literally all about the bathrooms at Hogwart's.
Ackchyually, she didn't say they never invented it. She said that before they invented it (or copied it from muggles or whatever) they would shit themselves and disappear the poop with a spell. Which is absolutely fucking hilarious. I don't know if she was on a bender or trolling or completely serious when she came up with that literal shit, but that's best retcon, much better than gay Dumbledore and black Hermione.

Youtube really wants me to watch breadtubers whine about JK. Sarah Z wasn't too surprising to see pop up because the algorithm loves her, but it's started throwing absolute nobodies like "Jessie Gender" at me too. I guess Rowling triggered the dragonkin over at Google HQ.
 
Youtube really wants me to watch breadtubers whine about JK. Sarah Z wasn't too surprising to see pop up because the algorithm loves her, but it's started throwing absolute nobodies like "Jessie Gender" at me too. I guess Rowling triggered the dragonkin over at Google HQ.

Ironically, the dragonkin are probably one of the reasons JKR needs to speak. It's mentally unstable people taking over a completely different diagnosed. Like, let's take for a moment all transgender notions as true: the brain is confused by the male-female dichotomy, fine. But there is no way your brain can believe they're a dragon. Or deer. Or a fucking building.
 
I do wonder what's going to happen next? Would people stop going to the Wizarding World of Harry Potter in Disney? Ban the books from the library, or burn their own copies? Tell their future kids, J.K is a terf and never read them her books for bedtime?

Well, in the UK one school responded by changing a school house name from Rowling to being named after Malorie Blackman.


I enjoyed the quote from the school's head:

"As a school, our business is education, it's not about coming down on one side or another"

But by removing Rowling's name they have kind of come down on one side...

Even more hilariously, they've decided to rename all their houses to virtue signal be more inclusive. Out goes Jane Austen and Wilberforce (leader of a movement to abolish the slave trade) and in with the new house names:

Freddie Mercury (a rock star whose personal behaviours were somewhat extreme)
Tanni Grey-Thompson (a disabled athlete who has expressed concerns about trans women in women's sport by attending meetings hosted by radfems. Her views sound similar to JKR but she's not high-profile enough to attract a pile-on from SJWs and TRAs)

EaQDV7QXgAAEXnW.png


I think we can conclude that nothing much is going to happen apart from a bit of virtue signalling that doesn't materially change anything.
 
Lol, you thought Rupert Grint might be #based? You were wrong!
View attachment 1371558

Pathetic. Again, if you truly believe this go fuck a troon and suck dick Rupert. Do it. Swallow feminine sperm.

I don't believe for a second they actually believe this statement. I don't believe actual sane people truly think a man in a dress is just magically a woman because he says he is. And I don't understand why they say these things when we all know they don't believe it deep down.

Why has such a small percentile hijacked common sense and made people actually say shit like this when nobody but actual mentally damaged people think it.
 
Pathetic. Again, if you truly believe this go fuck a troon and suck dick Rupert. Do it. Swallow feminine sperm.

I don't believe for a second they actually believe this statement. I don't believe actual sane people truly think a man in a dress is just magically a woman because he says he is. And I don't understand why they say these things when we all know they don't believe it deep down.

Why has such a small percentile hijacked common sense and made people actually say shit like this when nobody but actual mentally damaged people think it.

I like how tranny sperging always devolves into the angry retards writing porn about how they want trans people to fuck them kek
 
Lol, you thought Rupert Grint might be #based? You were wrong!
View attachment 1371558
All three potter actors spoke out in a way that gives them a chance to play future roles for big movies, by backstabbing the writer who hasn't written any more noteworthy books? Stop the presses!
 
I like that it took JK Rowling expressing a reasonable opinion on Twitter for her fans to stop obsessing over this children's books series in their 20s.

They're still comparing her to her own villains though (Umbridge, Voldemort etc.) and memeing that various different people wrote Harry Potter. They're still hanging in there as best as they can!
 
They're still comparing her to her own villains though (Umbridge, Voldemort etc.) and memeing that various different people wrote Harry Potter. They're still hanging in there as best as they can!

That is some sad cope. Just admit you still like the books but don't like the views of the author.

Wait, who am I kidding, only sane people can separate the art from the artist.
 
Millions of Harry Potter fans across all the usa and the world are now asking themselves, is JK Rowling actually a bigot? Is she really a trans-phobic person? I looked at her twitter. And I learned, sadly, she is indeed Transphobic. Jk Rolwing said that men are men, and women are women. And she said Transexual women, are actually not women. Deeply problematic language she is using. Why now? Why is the author of Harry Potter suddenly now attacking Transexuals? What is her goal here? If her goal was to upset lots of Harry Potter fans then she is accomplishing that. Some Harry Potter fans are but Most Harry Potter fans are not transexual themselves. However about 90% roughly of all Harry Potter fans do indeed support Transexual rights so its a little shocking and frankly rather odd that JK Rowling is doing this. Especially right now during this political landscape.
 
Millions of Harry Potter fans across all the usa and the world are now asking themselves, is JK Rowling actually a bigot? Is she really a trans-phobic person? I looked at her twitter. And I learned, sadly, she is indeed Transphobic. Jk Rolwing said that men are men, and women are women. And she said Transexual women, are actually not women. Deeply problematic language she is using. Why now? Why is the author of Harry Potter suddenly now attacking Transexuals? What is her goal here? If her goal was to upset lots of Harry Potter fans then she is accomplishing that. Some Harry Potter fans are but Most Harry Potter fans are not transexual themselves. However about 90% roughly of all Harry Potter fans do indeed support Transexual rights so its a little shocking and frankly rather odd that JK Rowling is doing this. Especially right now during this political landscape.
Is this a copypasta? :lol:
 
I sometimes wonder when J.K Rowling will make another book and stop messing with Harry Potter. I like Harry Potter as much as the next guy but she needs to make new stories at this point. Or she won't and will still think being anti-trans is ok. I should've read the books first honestly.
 
I sometimes wonder when J.K Rowling will make another book and stop messing with Harry Potter. I like Harry Potter as much as the next guy but she needs to make new stories at this point. Or she won't and will still think being anti-trans is ok. I should've read the books first honestly.

She has, under the pseudonym of "Galbraith, Robert".
 
Back