UK Jack the Ripper breakthrough as DNA 'finally unmasks serial killer after 136 years' - Every. Fucking. Time.

lmao.png

This is the face of the world's most infamous serial killer according to an author who has been studying the Jack the Ripper case for close to 30 years.


Ripper researcher Russell Edwards has used new facial remodelling technology to create this CGI black and white image of how the killer would have looked at the time.

It was after Mr Edwards used DNA evidence from the shawl of one of his victims to "prove" that Jack the Ripper was actually Aaron Kosminski, a Jewish immigrant from Poland who was one of the key suspects at the time of the horrific Whitechapel murders.

Now, in a second book on the case, Mr Edwards claims not only to have conclusively identified the Ripper, but also the reason why he mutilated his victims in such a way and how he evaded justice.

Jack the Ripper butchered and murdered at least five women in the Whitechapel area of east London over just a four month period from August to November 1888.

Three victims had internal organs removed, which led to a theory that the killer had some anatomical or surgical skills.

Police actually investigated the brutal killings of 11 women, mainly prostitutes, from April 1888 to February 1891, known as the Whitechapel murders.

It is widely agreed that the third to the seventh of them, known as the Canonical Murders, were definitely carried out by the Ripper.

Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes, and Mary Jane Kelly were killed over nine weeks from August to November 1888.

They all had their throats cuts, post-mortem injuries, including to the vagina, and body parts were taken from Chapman, Eddowes and Kelly. So, how did Mr Edwards "confirm" Kosminski as the Ripper?

PC Watkins was the officer who discovered the heavily mutilated corpse of the Ripper's fourth victims Catherine Eddowes on September 30 1888 on a pavement in Mitre Square.

Her head was nearly severed and her nose cut open. She was his second victim on the same night. A silk shawl she had was covered in blood.

Nearly 120 years later in 2007, Mr Edwards, a north London businessman, found the alleged shawl on auction in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk.

Curious, but sceptical, he bought it and found it remarkably preserved with what appeared to be blood and even semen stains still on the garment.

It was later established that as her body was taken to the morgue, acting Police Sergeant Amos Simpson took it as a somewhat macabre "gift" for his wife, Jane.

Although she never wore it, it remained in the family for generations and was auctioned off by Sergeant Simpson’s great-great-nephew David Melville-Hayes.

Mr Edwards was surprised that such an ornate silk scarf, decorated with flowers would have been Ms Eddowes', as she was a poverty-stricken drunk

Yet, the design and dyes used appeared to be like those of the time produced in St Petersburg. This caused Mr Edwards to consider if it could have actually been a possession of Ripper suspect Kosminski, who hailed from the Russian empire.

Could he have left it at the scene, he wondered. So began a lengthy series of DNA tests on the presumed blood and semen stains, with the help of distant relatives of the victim and suspect.

Remarkably, there was a positive match for the blood stains and an unnamed direct descendant of Ms Eddowes.

A request to exhume Kosminski’s body was declined, however, the DNA found in the semen stains was also a match for one of Kosminski's sister’s descendants.

This, says Mr Edwards, is conclusive proof as to the identity of Jack the Ripper - a case that remained unsolved since 1888.

Kosminski was born on September 11, 1865, making him 22 and 23 at the time of the murders. He grew up in Klodawa, near Warsaw, the youngest of seven children, with his father dying when he was aged just eight.

His mother remarried and records suggest he may have been sexually abused by his stepfather. In 1882, six years before the murders, the family fled to the East End of London to escape anti-Semitism that was spreading across eastern Europe after the death of Tsar Alexander II a year earlier.

During the murders investigation, the Dr Robert Anderson, head of the London Criminal Investigation Department, had designated Kosminski as key suspect as the killer.

Previously confidential police reports, that were published in 1894 as the Macnaghten Memorandum, recorded that detectives believed he had a "great hatred of women, specially of the prostitute class, and had strong homicidal tendencies".

Butm even then political correctness made them reluctant to accuse a Jew, due to the potential fallout of antiSemitism.

With no known photographs of Kosminski’ ever found, Mr Edwards then contacted his descendants to obtain as many historical family portraits as possible to feed them into a sophisticated computer programme which has created his likeness based on the appearance of close relatives.

The new image shows a young man with short hair, high cheek bones and a piercing stare.

Further research by Mr Edwards has since uncovered how he believes the serial killer evaded justice due to his brother's involvement in freemasonry, and even why the mutilations took place.

In February 2023 he received several photographs, including one of 15 men all with handlebar moustaches and dressed the same in suits with an overgarment. They were revealed to be members of the Lodge of Israel, an order of Freemasonry set up for Jewish immigrants in Britain.

One of them was Kosminski’s eldest brother, Isaac, who was a wealthy tailor who had moved to London in 1870 and changed his last name to Abrahams. Remarkably, in an ancient Masonic Code, the "Master Mason", called Hiram Abiff, was murdered by three assassins, known as "The Juwes" for refusing to give up his secrets.

The fable led to the creation of thee Masonic blood oaths giving descriptions of mutilations, such as cutting throats, removing tongues, and "That my left breast had been torn open and my heart and vitals taken."

Mr Edwards is convinced that the Ripper was not a random mutilator, but was carrying out these Masonic instructions.

He also believes that the Masonic connections of his brother were probably what prevented his younger sibling's arrest, to avoid the fallout against the Jews.

More alarmingly, the Ripper left another clue at the Eddowes murder scene. Nearby scrawled in chalk was the mysterious phrase

"The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing."

With the word Juwes, spelt in the same Masonic way.

Kosminski was never arrested and in 1890, after suffering a suspected schizophrenic breakdown, in which he threatened his sister with a knife, he committed to Colney Hatch lunatic asylum in North London.

He died 28 years later in the Leavesden Asylum, Hertfordshire.

Naming Jack The Ripper: The Definitive Reveal by Russell Edwards is out now published by Rowman & Littlefield.


src / arc
 
They claim to find the murderer every ten years then it just quietly goes away it seems. Alan Moore most effected etc.
I"m sticking with Walter Sickert until someone tells me otherwise. Patricia Cornwell actually released a mountain of evidence to back her claim unlike those faggy ripperologists who throw hissy fits and make up shit out of thin air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No. 7 cat
As to the shawl being a macabre gift to the policeman's wife, I don't think it's that big a stretch. The Victorians did some weird shit for entertainment. It was hardly unusual to have elaborate taxidermy in the home (very 'Dinner for Schmucks' type stuff), and many people had cabinets of curiosities (some were so large they filled entire homes) with oddities like Egyptian mummies and shrunken heads, pieces of corpse skin with tattoos, and various human organs in jars. And people liked to hang out during hangings and treat them like fairs or picnics.

Maybe the cop's wife was into seances, and a gift like that would go great with her parties.
 
Okay, hear me out: “Jack the Ripper” might not have existed at all, or at least not as an individual chopping up hookers for whatever reason. It's already acknowledged that the “From Hell” letter that gave the Whitechapel Killer his name was a forgery by a newspaper hoping to boost sales, and a lot of other papers did the same thing. It wouldn't surprise me if even the canonical murders were either unrelated or outright conducted at the behest of journalists wanting the sales boost from having the “hot scoops” of “Jack the Ripper™️.” After all, you don't hate journalists enough, and you will never be able to.
 
I call bullshit.

"A silk shawl she had was covered in blood. Nearly 120 years later in 2007, Mr Edwards, a north London businessman, found the alleged shawl on auction in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk. Curious, but sceptical, he bought it and found it remarkably preserved with what appeared to be blood and even semen stains still on the garment."

COVERED in blood, so what they washed it a billion times and left a singular blood stain on there for us 120 years later. "allegedly wore" to boot.

I wouldn't call this case solved.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
I member a rather notorious instance where some shitty author and archetypical rich BPD skank randomly decided that a somewhat famous victorian painter was actchully Jack the Ripper because of his spoopy paintings.....fucking seriously.....which indicated he had a mutated penis......again fucking seriously.....all of which caused him to hate women and thus become the Joker or something, and after straight up destroying one of his paintings to mine for DNA evidence she proudly filmed a documentary series that revealed the DNA evidence did not 100% prove he *wasnt* the guy who wrote the "Dear Boss" letters and thus he was totally the killer

EDIT: Well googling imaging her was a fucking mistake...
View attachment 6499565
Wasn’t there also a suspect in the Black Dahlia murder who some grifter thinks did it because he had weird artwork?
 
Was this shawl definitely the victim's, or could it have been left there by the killer?

If it were hers then I dunno blood and semen on it could be from any number of people. She was a prostitute after all

If the killer left it there that makes it a lot more certain that the blood and spooge on it was his
 
What are the odds that some random freak Jacked the Off in the shawl long after the murder?
 
joos aside i dont fully buy into it being the same shawl. i cant imagine someone gifting his wife a shawl that still has cum and blood stains on it
@Flaming Insignias beat me to it and covered it great, but I want to add my own voice. Regardless of the validity of any of the rest of this theory I 100% believe that in Victorian times a police officer might give this as a gift to his wife. And furthermore that she might be secretly or non-secretly delighted. It wasn't that long ago that people wanted to keep ripped of bits of the condemned's clothing from public hangings. There was a very real trade in bits of old mummies unearthed from Egypt and all sorts of other things.

Hell, I've dated girls today that would have loved such a gift.

'The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing'
Wait, I knew Jack the Ripper was a monster, but are you telling me he used double negatives? I feel sick.

A man with a vocation will often stop at nothing to show his pride in it to the woman he loves.
Many women will attest to having had a male of the species talk to them at considerable length about his 14th level Tiefling Rogue or such. When a man is enthused by something, he always believes the object of his affections must share it.


Anyway, I can actually bring this thread to a conclusion because I know who Jack the Ripper was. His name was Sebastian and he lived at 14B Heresford Lane, London.
1728571952411.png
 
Since my inner ripper-sperg has been reactivated by this thread, I will now prosneed to throw shit at another fairly well known suspect that is uniquely tied to the Kosminski of this Article and is yet another proud member of the "polish jew suspect" club.

David Cohen.

The long and the short of it is that what we know of Kosminski based on police and asylum records about him straight up contradicts the details laid out by the officers about the main polish jew suspect which I will now paraphrase from the link previously posted
  • Melville Macnaghten, Assistant Chief Constable of Scotland Yard's Criminal Investigation Department in the aftermath of the canonical ripper murders wrote that the guy he and his homies thought was 99.99% the guy was "a Polish Jew & resident in Whitechapel. This man became insane owing to many years indulgence in solitary vices. He had a great hatred of women, especially of the prostitute class, & had strong homicidal tendencies; he was removed to a lunatic asylum about March 1889. There were many circs connected with this man which made him a strong 'suspect'"
  • Sir Robert Anderson, Assistant Crime Comissioner at the time of the murders wrote "One did not need to be a Sherlock Holmes to discover that the criminal was a sexual maniac of a virulent type; that he was living in the immediate vicinity of the scenes of the murders; […] And the conclusion we came to was that he and his people were certain low-class Polish Jews […] I am almost tempted to disclose the identity of the murderer and of the pressman who wrote the letter above referred to. But no public benefit would result from such a course, and the traditions of my old department would suffer. I will merely add that the only person who had ever had a good view of the murderer unhesitatingly identified the suspect the instant he was confronted with him; but he refused to give evidence against him."
  • Chief Inspector Donald Sutherland Swanson, a high ranking officer involved in the ripper case from the getgo, annotated the above section of Anderson's writings with "because the suspect was also a Polish Jew and also because his evidence would convict the suspect, and witness would be the means of murderer being hanged which he did not wish to be left on his mind. […] And after this identification which suspect knew, no other murder of this kind took place in London. […] Continuing from page 138, after the suspect had been identified at the Seaside Home where he had been sent by us with difficulty in order to subject him to identification, and he knew he was identified. On suspect's return to his brother's house in Whitechapel he was watched by the police (City CID) by day & night. In a very short time the suspect with his hands tied behind his backs, he was sent to Stephney Workhouse and then to Colney Hatch and died shortly afterwards - Kosminski was the suspect - DSS"
So to combine the details of these quotes, the polish jew suspect...
  • was an extremely violent psycho and sexual deviant
  • had a massive hate boner for chicks and especially prostitutes
  • was ID'd by a witness shortly after the killings but let go due to the witness not being willing to testify
  • was actively monitored by cops until he chimped out majorly enough to be hogtied and dragged to the local asylum in early 1889
  • died shortly after reaching the asylum
  • fit the rest of the standard suspect checklist (i.e. lived in whitechapel, was present in the area for the murders, was physically capable of committing them, had no known alibis on record)
The problem with Kosminski is that most of these points just straight up dont match up to him.
  • He was recorded as being almost entirely non violent, if extremely paranoid and a coomer
  • He was terrified of other people and barely capable of speaking english, and showed no signs of hatred towards women
  • He was first admitted to the asylum in 1891 and was not restricted there until years later
  • He died in 1919, thirty years after the polish jew suspect was supposed to have died
If you allow some leeway for the officers not being fully aware of the details or having forgotten or misremembered shit then Kosminski kinda fits some of these points if you allow for some level of confirmation bias and Victorian stuffiness, but the amount of shit that doesn't even remotely fit in terms of timeline and events and behaviour, especially given this would have been arguably the biggest case any of these men worked on and thus less likely to be randomly forgotten, makes it seem more likely they were talking about somebody else entirely.

And it just so happens that there was a man who may well have fit the bill.

Enter "David Cohen", a young polish jew who lacked any previous record was found wandering the streets of whitechapel ranting and raving and taken to a police station in late 1888. While not remarked upon or suspected at the time, later researchers found his records matched the previous details almost perfectly in terms of timing and characterisation including him being taken to the asylum in early 1889 and dying shortly after in late 1889. The only detail that didnt fit was the name which nobody could confuse for "kosminsky" in any context.

However, there were records for a young polish jew in the whitechapel area who had been treated for syphilis, which was a near guarantee he frequented local prostitutes given the time and place, one who worked as a butcher and thus matched the early "leather apron" reports, and one who vanished from history as soon as "David Cohen" came into the picture. His name? Nathan Kaminsky.

As you can probably guess, the theory is that these two were one and the same, with the vaguely jewish sounding "David Cohen" being slapped on the then unidentified Kaminsky at some stage, and upon being ID'd the name Kaminsky was mistaken for Kosminsky or vice versa which resulted in the confusion between the two for later researchers and possibly even authorities at the time enough to cause another dead end.

The problem here is that this is entirely circumstantial and based largely on writer speculation over anything concrete, and there is fundamentally no serious evidence connecting Nathan Kaminsky or David Cohen to eachother, or either to the murders and there could be any number of albis or other factors that could rule him/them out of any involvement. Thus all that your left with is a bigass pile of maybes.

And this is all contained within the wider maybe that is the "polish jew suspect" idea which while perfectly plausible, was simply the popular idea among a segment of police officials at the time. Officials who had resolutely failed to catch the killer despite hitherto unprecedented pressure and backing. Officials who despite knowing how much prestige they would get for having openly claimed to have "caught" the ripper, had so little faith in their suspicions being accepted by the wider police force and authorities that they wound up being mere footnotes in memorandums or memoirs. Officials who were just as likely if not moreso as modern day police officials to get fixated on a certain theory and focus solely on that to the detriment of other lines of enquiry.

This is also incidentally how I feel about that "man from the train" hypothetical serial killer who was effectively invented by a currentyear author to link a sketchy kraut guy with a massive string of similar sounding murders in the US in the 1900s-1910s, culminating in the infamous Hinterkaifeck massacre in germany. Sure it all sounds perfectly plausable, even convincing when laid out on paper, but at the end of the day its effectively just crime fanfiction without anything resembling compelling proof beyond apparent coincidences that inevitably become more dubious as you examine further
 
Last edited:
Yeah but that shawl has had more hands on it than a hookers tits on payday
Even if you were to gather each and every remaining piece of "verified 100% on the victim when killed" tier evidence, break them down molecule by molecule to get every possible strand of DNA, spend the next decade ruling out the DNA of police and mortician officials who could have handled the evidence by painstakingly collecting and analysing DNA from the families of each and every one of these people, then with the remaining unknowns spend another decade search for any crossover DNA on all/most pieces that has not already been discounted, and then finally tracking down through family members who of this line might have been in whitechapel at that time....all you get is another fucking maybe because its entirely possible the guy was just an innocent cart driver employed to move shit for the police at some point, or that he was an innocent sex pervert who broke into the station and jack his ripper over the evidence, or a thousand other possiblys and maybes.

If you wound up finding someone whose later family still has a bunch of old family heirlooms that look identical to shit reported to have been stolen by the killer from the victims along with a couple journals and memoirs with entries talking about murdering hookers in london during 1888 and the mummified remains of a bunch of internal ladyparts on the family mantlepiece then that maybe *might* then turn into a probably.....but as you can likely tell from how absurd I had to make this hypothetical atop an already absurd hypothetical, this level of confirmation will always remain straight up fantasy.

In the end Jack the Ripper serves us well as a light thought exercise for amateur crime solver spergs as we go through a limited set of data and a colourful array of contemporary opinions and latter day theories and currentyear understandings derived from later serial killers, but there aint any real possibility anyone is ever gonna 100% or even 50% or 10% crack the case.
 
If the dna work stands up it’s pretty conclusive
Awkshoolly no less than the guy who came up with "genetic fingerprinting" in the first place says IDing via mitochondrial DNA is retarded and the shawl, and any DNA on it, are worthless as evidence to identify the killer
 
Back