James Cameron's Avatar to get four sequels - The message will still be the same

Who is the fucking audience for this movie and I sincerely don't know.
I used to consider myself a pretty empathetic person, I felt like I could understand where other people are coming from but these past few years between avatar fans and
maskfags / lockdown fetishists
I have to admit I'm at a loss, I don't understand any of these people. That anyone saw the poster for Avatar with tall blue cat people and said "yes, I want to see this" is unfathomable to me. I honestly just don't fucking get it.
 
I doubt it'll hit 2 billion. Frankly, I'm shocked that it's done as well as it has. Who is the fucking audience for this movie and I sincerely don't know.
brand name is a powerful thing.

however that only works so far, highly doubt avatar 3 (or let alone 4-5, which I don't think is gonna happen anyway) will make as much. otoh what else is there, we're at a point where avatar 2 is "good" because the rest is pretty much all dogshit, so it could be considered "successful" by that alone.
 
Last edited:
I really doubt this thing will turn much a of a profit given how much it cost to make plus marketing and distribution. The original only made money since it had that whole 3D shit that retards ate up, but this is a decade past when the iron is hot and there's too many competitors for big budget schlock now.

Cameron has really gone mask off with how much of a gigantic faggot he actually is that I love seeing his career circle the drain.
 
I am hoping, beyond all hope, that the movies doesn't reach its profitable goal and Cameron has to start selling toys of all the human tech and N'avi. Just a whole generation of boys raised to burn the lame blue cat creatures to the ground with their kickass mech/crab suits from the Air & Water mobile launch platforms.
 
Exploring this avenue would probably save this "franchise". Avatar 2 would have been a hell of a lot more interesting, if the colonel, exploiting the fact that he is a fucking Na'vi now, convinced another tribe(s) not to accept Jake Sully, because he is a false Na'vi, with a savior complex. He also could have shown them, the intentions of humanity are not completely evil and its actions are driven by the need for survival, which is something the Na'vi should be able to relate to. Moreover, he could have made the Na'vi realize technology and cooperating with humans could be beneficial for them. This would have made Quaritch the true nemesis of Jake. Both fake Na'vis, with opposite viewpoints, but ultimately, both manipulating the Na'vi populace. The ultimate twist would be, the Na'vi realizing they are being played and oust Jake and Quaritch, as they bring nothing, but misery. They would also decide to mend their relations with humanity, allowing it to pursue its goals. The life on Pandora would completely change, as more and more Na'vi abandon their ways, to seek new opportunities, unthinkable for them in the past. Their decision would lead to the planet mirroring Earth, as time goes by. The environment would suffer, but the Na'vi would enjoy the benefits of a more civilized society. The viewers would be allowed to interpret this, however they want.

But, we all know this is never gonna happen, because that would require nuanced writing, which the makers of Avatar are clearly incapable of.


There is an actual hivemind in Avatar. Another way for the movies to redeem themselves, is exploring the possibility, that this organism may actually be malevolent and the Na'vi would have to break free from its control.
Perhaps some Na'vi tribes would try to make deals with the human forces to gain better weapons or technology they would not otherwise have to give themselves an edge over tribes they do not like or even try and use the human forces as an ally to eradicate rival tribes.

Throughout history, many hunter gatherer societies tried to use explorers or colonists for their own ends against their tribal enemies.
 
What did you like about it?
I’m just easy to please when it comes to pretty fantasy stuff. The plot wasn’t anything special but aside from a few things that felt like retcons I didn’t think it was bad. It’s cheesy but that kinda comes with the territory when your movie is about giant blue cat aliens that love nature.
 
Last edited:
I’m just easy to please when it comes to pretty fantasy stuff. The plot wasn’t anything special but aside from a few things that felt like retcons I didn’t think it was bad. It’s cheesy but that kinda comes with the territory when your movie is about giant blue cat aliens that love nature.
Fair enough. I have my share of dumb movies I like too. I was just curious what you thought since most people are ripping on it for the same (although valid) reasons.
 
Huh….

8918EDD6-6BFC-44C9-9195-EC1A31FB173C.jpegD25876E3-EB6A-41B6-A627-18F85B86DC70.jpeg

Well, that should be admirable, but why do you care about this now?

FB80CBC2-B9EB-44B8-B17F-A858FDCA6955.jpegF3BE7A8B-37CF-494C-BB89-846A5C3E7022.jpeg

 
Huh….

View attachment 4165878View attachment 4165880

Well, that should be admirable, but why do you care about this now?



What a fucking pussy.

Not only he has metamorphosed into a limp-wristed-faggot, he has also become a full fledged anti-humanist.

Check out this quote:

“If I were to do another Terminator film and maybe try to launch that franchise again, which is in discussion, but nothing has been decided, I would make it much more about the AI side of it than bad robots gone crazy,”

Sauce

That's right, if given the chance to redo Terminator, he'll make Skynet the sympathetic one.

FUCK this guy.
 
Huh….

View attachment 4165878View attachment 4165880

Well, that should be admirable, but why do you care about this now?


It fails on so many levels. First of all, you still praise using weapons against enemies like using bows or sicing wildlife, so the fact they aren't guns (who are unrealistic futuristic guns anyways) doesn't matter. Secondly the entire franchise glorifies violence despite the humans being the ones who at least attempted civil discussion, if anything it is a justification of private gun ownership. Third the film doesn't fetisize guns, it fetisizes being a human betraying otherkin.
 
The real reason Cameron cut out the gun violence is that the scenes were ludicrous. The blue aliens should not be defeating machine guns and nukes and whatever. Imagine the ending of Last Samurai where the samurai charge through the gunfire and kill everyone with their swords. This is how combat in Avatar plays out.
That's probably it or trying to get a PG13 rating.
 
Back