- Joined
- May 25, 2013
Here; You can Share his learnings and Full Adult Education! I think it may come in use later on.
Burned Docs Japan WW2 Paper
- Thread starter garbageraider
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Status
Here; You can Share his learnings and Full Adult Education! I think it may come in use later on.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
Hmmm, I feel like this essay is missing something. Something very important, in fact it's probably one of the most important moments of the twentieth century. I just can't put my finger on it, what could it b-
Ah, that's it!
Yuck!
- Joined
- May 20, 2014
Doubly related:
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2013
ChristianRicardo is STRAIGHT!!!! GET IT THROUGH YOUR SKULLS!!! UGH! THE RAINBOW REPRESENTS THE FULL SPECTRUM OF HIS LEARNING AND EDUCATION OF SUCH AND THINGS!
Here; You can Share his learnings and Full Adult Education! I think it may come in use later on.
RICARDO ES HOMOSEXUAL. LE GUSTAN LOS PEPINOS.
Not that I've gotten that off my chest, as soon as I saw the meme you made I remembered the time Retardo said something like war gives you prickly-wicklies or something like that? In his FUTURE MESSAGE. That's why I'm not surprised at his use of "yuck!"
Last edited:
qld
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2013
The Japs just wanted to watch Burt Lancaster pursue his TRUE and HONEST love quest with Deborah Kerr on Oahu's beaches, but they were naïve about such things...
- Joined
- May 26, 2013
Hmmm, I feel like this essay is missing something. Something very important, in fact it's probably one of the most important moments of the twentieth century. I just can't put my finger on it, what could it b-
Ah, that's it!
Not only did he forget the Atomic Bomb, but Chris failed to mention Tsutomu Yamaguchi, a man who survived both bombings and even outlived the bombers.
TWO FUCKING PAGES MY ASS
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2013
Chris said:
Pictured: Insults and yuck. Strangely, no guns.
Chris said:
Pictured: the Japanese sign the Unconditional Agreement to Peace, 1945.
Chris said:
Pictured: Rejoicing Japanese civilians.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Guys, it's Chris. It's impressive he didn't try write it from the perspective of one of Bob's nuts. Hell, it's amazing that it's not written in pink.
:
asperhes
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
I'm going to make a controversial call and say that the teacher in question should have provided more guidance for this assignment. Since Chris turned in a rough draft, this means the teacher had a few critical minutes to see how Chris was interpreting the assignment and steer him in the right direction.
First, what was the actual assignment? To write a paper about World War Two? In 300 words? Using four sources? The teacher should have called Chris out on his overly broad topic, or allowed the paper to be significantly longer. The teacher herself would not have been able to write anything much better with these constraints.
Second, what assistance did Chris have in choosing sources? What were the rules for appropriate sources? Apparently, bullshit encyclopedia websites were just hunky-dory, since the teacher only criticized the format, not the sources themselves. The first of the monographs, Moody's War Against Japan, is a fluff book which does little more than showcase photographs, but this makes it just fine for moronic high school students, as far as I'm concerned. Most of my college students would not have been able to handle anything more complex, especially for a survey course. Remember that for Chris and most of these students, these will be the very first books they've ever read about WWII.
Chris should never have been allowed to use Utley's Going to War With Japan because it's beyond the capabilities of most high schoolers, especially for something called "English 1." It's got a thesis and footnotes and shit. It's a dialogue with other historians, as a proper monograph should be. Utley didn't care if his ideas would be accessible by high school students. A good teacher would have guided her students towards age-appropriate literature.
Chris, of course, is far less capable than the average high schooler, and the clear evidence for this is that he was unable to read Utley. At all. Most of his quotations are from the first couple pages of the monograph. That's as far as Chris got. And in this introduction to his book, all Utley was doing was setting the stage for his main topic, US-Japan relations, 1937-41. That's where all the shit about Wilson and Shandong come from. Chris was just out of his element, too lazy to read beyond page 5 and too retarded to understand what he was reading. The teacher should never have allowed him to use such a source. Again, most of my college students would have been nearly as hopeless. Or to put it another way, why the fuck was an English teacher letting her students write about history topics? She didn't know what she was doing. If the only grading criteria are things like structure, format, and clarity, why not let a trainable like Chris write about cupcakes or birthdays? He shouldn't have been placed in this position.
P.S. And where's the fucking grade? Did grades make baby cry?
First, what was the actual assignment? To write a paper about World War Two? In 300 words? Using four sources? The teacher should have called Chris out on his overly broad topic, or allowed the paper to be significantly longer. The teacher herself would not have been able to write anything much better with these constraints.
Second, what assistance did Chris have in choosing sources? What were the rules for appropriate sources? Apparently, bullshit encyclopedia websites were just hunky-dory, since the teacher only criticized the format, not the sources themselves. The first of the monographs, Moody's War Against Japan, is a fluff book which does little more than showcase photographs, but this makes it just fine for moronic high school students, as far as I'm concerned. Most of my college students would not have been able to handle anything more complex, especially for a survey course. Remember that for Chris and most of these students, these will be the very first books they've ever read about WWII.
Chris should never have been allowed to use Utley's Going to War With Japan because it's beyond the capabilities of most high schoolers, especially for something called "English 1." It's got a thesis and footnotes and shit. It's a dialogue with other historians, as a proper monograph should be. Utley didn't care if his ideas would be accessible by high school students. A good teacher would have guided her students towards age-appropriate literature.
Chris, of course, is far less capable than the average high schooler, and the clear evidence for this is that he was unable to read Utley. At all. Most of his quotations are from the first couple pages of the monograph. That's as far as Chris got. And in this introduction to his book, all Utley was doing was setting the stage for his main topic, US-Japan relations, 1937-41. That's where all the shit about Wilson and Shandong come from. Chris was just out of his element, too lazy to read beyond page 5 and too retarded to understand what he was reading. The teacher should never have allowed him to use such a source. Again, most of my college students would have been nearly as hopeless. Or to put it another way, why the fuck was an English teacher letting her students write about history topics? She didn't know what she was doing. If the only grading criteria are things like structure, format, and clarity, why not let a trainable like Chris write about cupcakes or birthdays? He shouldn't have been placed in this position.
P.S. And where's the fucking grade? Did grades make baby cry?
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
Why the hell did he put random Spanish in this? It wasn't some sort of composition for that class. Gotta love the whitest of trash latching onto a language his parents probably thought was spoken by mud people and filthy
Catholics. Nothing against most Catholics.
Catholics. Nothing against most Catholics.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
I didn't even notice the Spanish. Then again, I didn't notice a lot of what fatty wrote due to his crappy cursive and sentence structuring.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2013
I might be oversimplifying this but I don't believe Chris would've accepted any kind of guidance. He never accepted constructive criticism before, why would he do it then?
To me, it looks like the essay was corrected in the way all essays are corrected for NORMAL sutdents. You are right when you say Chris is no normal student, and I guess adaptations of the task should've been made in his case by the teacher, such as, I dunno, more explicit, concrete indications and such. However, the teacher has no obligation to make those adaptations if he/she isn't provided with a certificate that states Ricardo is a slow-in-the-mind. This makes me wonder if such a certificate was ever provided to the school/teachers, but that's a problem for another thread, I think.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
I work in an office during the summer. Paper clips and staples tend to do that with age. Best just to assume its made out of some sort of steel and move on. I don't think aluminum oxidizes like that.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
I had the same reaction to the formatting errors. How am I still amazed by the slack he was given by his teachers.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
I'm sure the teacher knew he was a SpEd kid. It's pretty self-evident. I'm sure the teacher is just happy that the paper wasn't covered in drool, melted chocolate and feces smears.
Remember kids, nuclear weapons are NO GOOD!
Remember kids, nuclear weapons are NO GOOD!
- Status