Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Can't believe I'd ever look at old Jim and say to myself "I miss you". Not just because obviously he's pre-troon but as a persona he had a unique style that set him apart and he stuck to it, if someone else was dressed as old Jim and stood at a lectern my mind would probably think of Jim Sterling but you don't get that when its just a troon stood in some randon location.
 
Essentially, Jim wants to be a being superior to all women and men, but still deigns to take advantage of women’s health resources, spaces, and pretty much anything else he covets.
You're overthinking it. There's a reason why Jims identity is like that. "Woman" is something that can be defined. If Jim tried to transition into a woman, no chance he'd satisfy even the bare minimum of criteria for that. But if you transition in, say, something without a coherent definition, there are no criteria to be applied, and you can not fail the criteria that doesn't exist. That was a very calculated move. If a random tumblr girl invents an original identitydo not steal, she also creates some kind of a definition on what it is supposed to be. Jim did not do anything like that, and only thing known for sure about his identity is that it gives him title of 'trans'. Jims identity is like Gygax - true form of it can't be grasped, therefore insults are uneffective.
 
Guys, what do you think would be neccessary for Jim Sterling to acknowledge the existence of his thread, this forum or Null?
 
Guys, what do you think would be neccessary for Jim Sterling to acknowledge the existence of his thread, this forum or Null?
Maybe making fun of his 800K and under subscriber special if he posts it? In all honesty, Jim probably won't acknowleges the Farms unless he goes full lolcow and sues the site for defamation. The man is more preoccupied with Tweets and bad wrestling to give us the time of day.
 
Both of them look horrifying.
In the first pic Jim looks bad, but at least he doesn't look like a lunatic pretending to be an angry 60 years old woman who let herself go long ago. He looks passable at least, but then, considering his current circus freak look, fucking anything looks passable next to Jim lol!

Essentially, Jim wants to be a being superior to all women and men, but still deigns to take advantage of women’s health resources, spaces, and pretty much anything else he covets. It’s like a little kid playing superheroes and declaring he has athe power to have every superpower. Of course Jim is basically Rogue from X-Men, except he doesn’t actually get any actual quality from the people he sucks the life out of, and doesn’t have the decency to wear gloves.
Precisely. It all comes down to his ego, he is nothing but a deeply entitled narcissist who wants to have every need of his catered to, while looking for a chance to play victim at every other occasion. Jim hates everyone outside of his own little clique, but can't live without them. If he keeps going down this road, in a few years he will literally be MovieBob in a dress, a bloated fuck living off old glories and growing increasingly unhinged at the outside world, catering to a small posse of fellow lunatics on his own virtual bubble!
 
I've been checking in on Jim's subscriber count using Social Blade. Anyone else notice their Future Projections tab is wildly wrong?
It's probably just a quirk of however they calculate that stuff, based on the fact that for the majority of its existence Jim's channel was mostly growing.

It is weird it hasn't course-corrected after 2 years of constant losses, but maybe whoever wrote the algorithm for projections never considered someone could fuck their shit up as bad as Jim.

ETA: I just checked Matt Jarbo and Moviebob's projections and it's exactly the same, despite neither channel experiencing any growth whatsoever in at least 2 years. So yeah, clearly just shitty code.
 
Screenshot_20220701-114558~2.png
Monthly update on sub loss. 21k remaining. Average loss per month is about 5-6k. Estimated under 800k is within 4 months
 
Channel review for the month of June 2022:
Videos Uploaded: 4

  • Jimquisition ('Diablo Immortal: Activision Blizzard's Latest Scam', 323k views)
  • Jimquisition ('Shocker: Fallout 76 Was Made With Abusive Crunch, 153k views)
  • Jimquisition ('Activion Is Innocent Because Activision Said So', 144k views)
  • Jimquisition ('Hardcore Ted Skips The Grind', 120k views)
Subs lost: 6k
Subs left til 800k: 21k
Patrons: 6,678 (-90)
Monthly Income: $12,742 (-$177)
Average Views Per Video: 185k (+38k)


(Only minor point of note this month is the difference in views when Jim talks about something topical vs his usual trash, but we all already knew that.)
 
Channel review for the month of June 2022:
Videos Uploaded: 4

  • Jimquisition ('Diablo Immortal: Activision Blizzard's Latest Scam', 323k views)
  • Jimquisition ('Shocker: Fallout 76 Was Made With Abusive Crunch, 153k views)
  • Jimquisition ('Activion Is Innocent Because Activision Said So', 144k views)
  • Jimquisition ('Hardcore Ted Skips The Grind', 120k views)
Subs lost: 6k
Subs left til 800k: 21k
Patrons: 6,678 (-90)
Monthly Income: $12,742 (-$177)
Average Views Per Video: 185k (+38k)


(Only minor point of note this month is the difference in views when Jim talks about something topical vs his usual trash, but we all already knew that.)

I think it'd be interesting to also give the changes in percentages to see "what's giving away", so to speak.

For example, it's interesting to note that despite what I've heard here a bit, Jim doesn't quite seem to be keeping a core of 'tards funding him, at least from quick maff on the numbers you gave; He lost twice more Patreon-bucks, relatively speaking, than he lost Youtube subscribers (of course, zombie-subscribers probably make that number somewhat meaningless), and while it's in a statistically insignificant way, the Patrons he lost were very slightly above-average (he lost more of his monthly income, %-wise, than he lost Patreon subscribers).
 
@Nixxit I don't add percentages because I'm shit at maths but Graphtreon provides those for anyone who is interested.

I also feel like his Patreon losses are not yet significant enough to warrant anything other than cursory mention, month to month, but if they start taking a significant hit (like Spoony-tier drops) I'm open to expanding that section.

Maybe in the annual review I'll include percentages, because he is on track for losing about 20% of his income this year.
 
Is he applying lead powder to his face and body like an Elizabethan lady? I know he's a pasty brit, but he's like corpse pale now.
His foundation shade is too pale and he hasn’t noticed, probably because men tend to have worse colour perception than women:
CD97A7E8-7FBC-4F0D-9D16-60B50A1E10DC.jpeghttps://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/120907-men-women-see-differently-science-health-vision-sex

EDIT: Also that hot pink lipstick is absolutely horrid for his complexion and makes his teeth look piss yellow.
 
@Nixxit I don't add percentages because I'm shit at maths but Graphtreon provides those for anyone who is interested.

I also feel like his Patreon losses are not yet significant enough to warrant anything other than cursory mention, month to month, but if they start taking a significant hit (like Spoony-tier drops) I'm open to expanding that section.

Maybe in the annual review I'll include percentages, because he is on track for losing about 20% of his income this year.
Something worth noting, the fact he's losing subs at around the same rate is actually impressive, as it means he's losing an increasing percentage of subscribers. We should set up some autism to track this decline.
 
Back