UK JK Rowling in ‘arrest me’ challenge over hate crime law - JK Rowling described several transgender women as men on the day of the new hate crime law

Archive (live)

1711985846901.png

JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a "rising tide of hatred".

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

The law does not protect women as a group from hatred.

The Scottish government is expected to include this later in a separate misogyny law.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X, external on the day the new legislation came into force.

She wrote: "Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls."

She added: "It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls, or address the current assault on women’s and girls’ rights, unless we are allowed to call a man a man.

"Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal."

Ms Rowling highlighted some criminal cases, including transgender rapist Isla Bryson and Andrew Miller, who abducted and assaulted a girl in the Scottish Borders.

She described them as men in a series of posts, that also included transgender campaigners and other individuals.

Ms Rowling said: "I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment."

Police Scotland said it had not received any complaints over the posts.

1711985867892.png

The maximum penalty under the new act in Scotland is a jail sentence of seven years.

A person commits an offence if they communicate material, or behave in a manner, "that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive," with the intention of stirring up hatred based on protected characteristics.

Hatred based on race, sex and religion was already illegal in Great Britain under the Public Order Act 1986, but that will also now fall under the new act in Scotland

The bar for this offence is lower than for the other protected characteristics, as it also includes "insulting" behaviour.

In England and Wales stirring up hatred over race, religion or sexual orientation by threatening behaviour remains illegal.

1711985891501.png

In Scotland, the new act also consolidates existing laws on crimes which are "aggravated by prejudice" towards a protected characteristic.

This can be taken into account by a judge who might issue a longer sentence or a higher fine.

A protest group of around 200 people gathered outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh on the morning the new law came into effect.

The Scottish government said the Hate Crime Act would provide protection from hate and prejudice without stifling individual expression.

First Minister Humza Yousaf said it was designed to deal with what he called a "rising tide of hatred" in society.

In response to general criticism of the act, he said: "Unless your behaviour is threatening or abusive and intends to stir up hatred, then you have nothing to worry about in terms of the new offences being created."
 
Scotland's First Minister is one Humza Yousaf. Well, that's a great Scottish name, isn't it. Surely this story's an April Fool's goof.

Have never read any Harry Potter stuff but respect Ms. Rowling's standing up for people's freedom. Have the sad feeling she may want to emigrate to the USA, where her rights to free speech are protected by a written Bill of Rights.
 
"stirring up" cool criminal justice system britin
 
Time to break out this absolute classic. Proof that troons are effectively the Death Eaters from her fictional works.

Conner Moon and the No Dick Snake.png
Conner Moon and the Dickless Troon. For extra hilarity, troons DO actually act like Death Eaters as they will screw each other over for just about any reason as well as enforce fear amongst their ranks. Also the uncomfortable notion that they're in control of major institutions as well.

Also, Rowling demonstrates what happens when someone who is subverted gets kicked around by the very people she supported. She winds up becoming their worst enemy.
 
She will get nowhere going full anti gay marriage, but she will go a long way with being reasonably anti Troon.
You're saying this as if she's secretly anti chomo and the only reason she hasn't said anything is for optics. She's not anti gay marriage because she supports gay marriage, not for any optical reasons.

Never forget, dumbledore is gay. The instant troons stop being an issue rowling will go back to supporting drag queen storytime hour.

I know what you're saying "It doesn't matter what she thinks as long as she helps battle the troon menance because the result is the same in the end", but this ignores the fact that her liberal beliefs are what helped create the troon menance and will inevitably re-create it should it go away.

JK isn't anti troon because of any deeply seeded ideological reasons to make society a better place, she was no problems with deviants ruining sociey as long as she isn't personally affected.
 
how about Neutron Bombs
they're all the dead but you keep the real estate mostly intact

in an odd "let's put the UK in 'nUKe' " coincidence the wife was watching Threads the other night
Neutron bombs are more of a strategic antitank/ship weapon than something meant to liquefy people in building. There's also the issue of activating shit, which is why they were never deployed beyond the proof of concept phase.
 
Neutron bombs are more of a strategic antitank/ship weapon than something meant to liquefy people in building. There's also the issue of activating shit, which is why they were never deployed beyond the proof of concept phase.
oh well shit there go my very concrete and real plans to nuke the UK
guess I'll have to reduce them to a shitposty joke online
 
Neutron bombs are more of a strategic antitank/ship weapon than something meant to liquefy people in building. There's also the issue of activating shit, which is why they were never deployed beyond the proof of concept phase.

It's been a while since I looked into it, but I'm pretty sure France had/has a pretty sizable arsenal of Neutron weapons. IIRC they were one of the few, if not only, country to field that kind of weapon in any meaningful numbers.
 
It really would be a shame if people started falsely reporting hate crimes being committed by Scottish politicians and journalists anonymously via this police Scotland form:

https://www.scotland.police.uk/secureforms/c3/

Obviously we won’t because gayops are against forum rules
It would be a shame if they ignored reports that aren't about unknown working class people or the political undesirables.

Rowling will get a pass not even because of her ability to pay a legion of lawyers, but because she has a huge spotlight on her. So she should taunt them, beg them to arrest her just to make the law look dumber.
 
Back