Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

[Iron Hamster]

Is he afraid 'Arianna' is copying him too closely?

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

FINE. Let's delve into BC service dog law, shall we?

The Guide Dog and Service Dog Act of 2015 does define "dog-in-training" and "dog-in-training team." These teams are allowed access to the places that a service dog is. This is probably what Yaniv is thinking of.

Unfortunately for Yaniv, "dog-in-training" is further defined by the associated Regulations as requiring a dog-in-training certificate:

1)The registrar must not issue or renew a dog-in-training certificate in respect of a dog unless​

• (a)the applicant is an authorized representative of an accredited training school, and
• (b)the dog is being, or will be, trained by a dog trainer on behalf of the accredited training school for the purpose of the dog becoming a guide dog or a service dog.

And the ""accredited training school" means an organization that provides training programs respecting guide dogs or service dogs and is accredited by one or both of the following organizations:​

• (a)Assistance Dogs International;
• (b)International Guide Dog Federation"

It is possible to train ones own dog and then have it certified via assessment (section 2(2)(ii)) but a dog being trained in this way without a certificate showing it's being trained by an accredited trainer associated with one of these schools would not qualify as a "dog-in-training."

An edifying Human Rights Tribunal case that addresses all of these issues is Arlin v. Coast Mountain Bus, 2016 BCHRT 71, involving a Ms. Arlin, who is deaf in one ear, and who attempted to access public transportation with an uncertified dog that she considered a service dog. This is, however, under the old Guide Dog Act.

I can't find any cases decided on the merits that involve someone claiming that an uncertified dog is a guide dog and attempting to access a public place, in BC, under the new Act.

There are a few cases from the Civil Resolution Tribunal that involve people wanting to keep "service dogs" in strata units.
Bednarek v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS1215, 2021 BCCRT 756 (CanLII) Owner must pay fines levied for having a dog against bylaws.

The GDSDA defines a “service dog” as a dog trained to perform specific tasks to assist a person with a disability, who is certified as a service dog. Under section 6 of the GDSDA certification must be completed by the registrar. I find that the Letter of Registration is not certification by the registrar as required under GDSDA section 6. Therefore, I find Tequila is not a service or guide dog for the purpose of the GDSDA.​

 

[pr3nt177]

FINE. Let's delve into BC service dog law, shall we?

The Guide Dog and Service Dog Act of 2015 does define "dog-in-training" and "dog-in-training team." These teams are allowed access to the places that a service dog is. This is probably what Yaniv is thinking of.

Unfortunately for Yaniv, "dog-in-training" is further defined by the associated Regulations as requiring a dog-in-training certificate:

1)The registrar must not issue or renew a dog-in-training certificate in respect of a dog unless​

• (a)the applicant is an authorized representative of an accredited training school, and
• (b)the dog is being, or will be, trained by a dog trainer on behalf of the accredited training school for the purpose of the dog becoming a guide dog or a service dog.

And the ""accredited training school" means an organization that provides training programs respecting guide dogs or service dogs and is accredited by one or both of the following organizations:​

• (a)Assistance Dogs International;
• (b)International Guide Dog Federation"

It is possible to train ones own dog and then have it certified via assessment (section 2(2)(ii)) but a dog being trained in this way without a certificate showing it's being trained by an accredited trainer associated with one of these schools would not qualify as a "dog-in-training."

An edifying Human Rights Tribunal case that addresses all of these issues is Arlin v. Coast Mountain Bus, 2016 BCHRT 71, involving a Ms. Arlin, who is deaf in one ear, and who attempted to access public transportation with an uncertified dog that she considered a service dog. This is, however, under the old Guide Dog Act.

I can't find any cases decided on the merits that involve someone claiming that an uncertified dog is a guide dog and attempting to access a public place, in BC, under the new Act.

There are a few cases from the Civil Resolution Tribunal that involve people wanting to keep "service dogs" in strata units.
Bednarek v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS1215, 2021 BCCRT 756 (CanLII) Owner must pay fines levied for having a dog against bylaws.

The GDSDA defines a “service dog” as a dog trained to perform specific tasks to assist a person with a disability, who is certified as a service dog. Under section 6 of the GDSDA certification must be completed by the registrar. I find that the Letter of Registration is not certification by the registrar as required under GDSDA section 6. Therefore, I find Tequila is not a service or guide dog for the purpose of the GDSDA.​

I feel the problem with yaniv is that he cherry picks what parts he wants to apply to him, in any given subject, and treats those points as actual law.

As you mentioned " It is possible to train ones own dog and then have it certified via assessment (section 2(2)(ii)) but a dog being trained in this way without a certificate showing it's being trained by an accredited trainer associated with one of these schools would not qualify as a "dog-in-training." " / " a dog-in-training certificate "...I feel he would most certainly mention it if he had one...hell, he'd even post a pic just to shut folks up. I know he's picking up pointers here as he tends to make Twitter posts related to things posted on KF so perhaps we'll see a pic.

Short Stack made a valid point re his recent encounter with a clinic/police.

edited to add for @Short Stack ...

& Ari? What about her threat that if he ever sues someone else?

AriannaAngel on Twitter: "@Indieanabones @MsEmm82 @Cdnwatcher @truste…

archived 30 Aug 2021 04:29:47 UTC

archive.ph

 

[ProtonMailManTheSequel]

At least Yaniv’s conveniently trumpeting the fact he’ll sue *before* he goes in anywhere. Because that’ll help his case, for sure.

Smart boy, our Jonny.

There's stupid.

Then there's REALLY stupid,

Then there's our Jon-boy.

 

[like_shutup_&_drive_scoob]

I feel the problem with yaniv is that he cherry picks what parts he wants to apply to him, in any given subject, and treats those points as actual law.

As you mentioned " It is possible to train ones own dog and then have it certified via assessment (section 2(2)(ii)) but a dog being trained in this way without a certificate showing it's being trained by an accredited trainer associated with one of these schools would not qualify as a "dog-in-training." " / " a dog-in-training certificate "...I feel he would most certainly mention it if he had one...hell, he'd even post a pic just to shut folks up. I know he's picking up pointers here as he tends to make Twitter posts related to things posted on KF so perhaps we'll see a pic.

Short Stack made a valid point re his recent encounter with a clinic/police.

edited to add for @Short Stack ...

View attachment 2493393View attachment 2493420
[URL unfurl="true"]https://archive.ph/wip/10Df3[/URL]

No!
I joked about Johnny being just like Chris but for it to be true already? Ewww no why.

 

[ComeGetSome]

On the "Service Dog" training grift...

From https://wagthedog.ca/frequently-asked-questions

So while Johnny could try to have his dog certified after, the person he's working with is not a certified "Service Dog" trainer, nor are they able to certify the animal as such. If fatso sues anyone for kicking him and his pooch from the store, he'll just get his ass handed to him. Again.

 

[GoutfootHorseface]

Just another law degree point and this will be the final one.

if fatty already holds a bachelors degree (in any subject) he can apply to take the accelerated 2 year law degree programme for graduates, you study on a undergrad course with the undergrad cohort but you’re technically a postgrad student, funding can be a little funky.

the first year of nearly all degrees doesn’t count towards your overall award and is simply an intro to university life, teaching and how to write university essays (very broadly speaking), people on the accelerated course take the same first year as all other undergrads but their second ( and final year) is spent doing final year modules, you are also able to opt out of doing a dissertation, you are awarded a qualifying law degree at the end (which the NCA) recognise.

 

[BallBuster]

His next scam is underway...
View attachment 2492319 View attachment 2492330

Jessica Simpson❤️ on Twitter: "I will sue and/or file a BC Human Righ…

archived 29 Aug 2021 23:22:20 UTC

archive.ph

edited to add: (from catfish Arianna)
View attachment 2492449

AriannaAngel on Twitter: "@Indieanabones @Cdnwatcher @trustednerd He'…

archived 29 Aug 2021 23:49:35 UTC

archive.ph

"in training" = "trained", Apparently.

"Can't you read this totally real declaration of my "Service dog in training" that I didn't buy on Amazon?

 

[ProtonMailManTheSequel]

Just another law degree point and this will be the final one.

if fatty already holds a bachelors degree (in any subject) he can apply to take the accelerated 2 year law degree programme for graduates, you study on a undergrad course with the undergrad cohort but you’re technically a postgrad student, funding can be a little funky.

the first year of nearly all degrees doesn’t count towards your overall award and is simply an intro to university life, teaching and how to write university essays (very broadly speaking), people on the accelerated course take the same first year as all other undergrads but their second ( and final year) is spent doing final year modules, you are also able to opt out of doing a dissertation, you are awarded a qualifying law degree at the end (which the NCA) recognise.

The very idea of Jon boy sitting for a three day bar exam. He would not make it through the first session. Of course, he would never make it anywhere near a bar exam in the first place. You think it is impossible for Jon-boy to transform himself into a woman? Well, hold Jonny's beer.....

 

[Mia Zapata's Ghost]

edited to add for @Short Stack ...

https://archive.ph/wip/10Df3

Johnny when we said you were about to beat Chris Chan in terms of horror it was not meant as a challenge!!!

 

[artilleryfroth]

Maybe not counting the undergrad requirement (four years--law school is three years although many feel the third year would be better spent "apprenticing" or some such.)

I think the requirement to get a whole undergraduate degree beforehand (which we know JY doesn’t have) is a bit significant.

More importantly though, who at his age is still listing the fact they finished high school?

 

[KeepHopeAlive]

I think the only bar exam Yaniv could ever pass would be one where he answers questions about alcoholic drinks.

 

[Anti Pickle Serum]

View attachment 2493420

Mum, do you ever have that not so fresh feeling? Like when your gangrenous clit falls off?

 

[pr3nt177]

Jessica Simpson❤️ on Twitter: "I highly suggest anyone and everyone w…

archived 30 Aug 2021 21:58:52 UTC

archive.fo

When you lose and simply can't let go.

Jessica Simpson❤️ on Twitter: "Jessica 1 - Strata 0 😂😂😂😂😂😂 #idi…

archived 30 Aug 2021 21:57:02 UTC

archive.fo

yaniv's desperate quest to discover WGkitty's identity continues.

🦉#DeplanetPredators on Twitter: "😂😂😂 JY things they'll ever get h…

archived 30 Aug 2021 22:10:12 UTC

archive.fo

Sounds as confident at graduating and finding gainful employment as he was over winning at the BCHRT. Bless

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

He's really tossing all of the lies out there. Allard doesn't have a paralegal program. Paralegal is a practical program you do at places like VCC. Not at UBC.

 

[Jessica Yaniv Eliminator]

Yeah his twitter is such a joke, fake followers, stupid shit being uploaded being passed off as victory for him, etc. Wow Johny, you really do surpass yourself, every time I think i've seen it all you go and out-do yourself! Keep it up!

 

[pr3nt177]

Jessica Simpson❤️ on Twitter: "@Blackheart19750 @SouthernSilver9 Actu…

archived 31 Aug 2021 01:36:56 UTC

archive.fo

Surprisingly (ha) yaniv doesn't answer why he was knocked back from receiving a certified/trained service dog if he had so "many disabilities". Although he did give his usual legal threat reply to being called out on his lies...

Jessica Simpson❤️ on Twitter: "@Blackheart19750 @CiCi0703 You’re a fu…

archived 31 Aug 2021 02:11:48 UTC

archive.fo

This fool is just the gift that keeps on giving. He and Russell Greer never learn. Neither have won anything and yet still continue to sue. I love it.

Separated at birth.

 

[Cousin_Larry]

View attachment 2496693

Jessica Simpson❤️ on Twitter: "@Blackheart19750 @SouthernSilver9 Actu…

archived 31 Aug 2021 01:36:56 UTC

archive.fo

Surprisingly (ha) yaniv doesn't answer why he was knocked back from receiving a certified/trained service dog if he had so "many disabilities". Although he did give his usual legal threat reply to being called out on his lies...
View attachment 2496785

Jessica Simpson❤️ on Twitter: "@Blackheart19750 @CiCi0703 You’re a fu…

archived 31 Aug 2021 02:11:48 UTC

archive.fo

This fool is just the gift that keeps on giving. He and Russell Greer never learn. Neither have won anything and yet still continue to sue. I love it.

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

It's almost impossible to be declared a vexatious litigant in BC, but Yaniv is trying to make history . . .

For those of you following along at home, this would be s. 18 of the Supreme Court Act

18 If, on application by any person, the court is satisfied that a person has habitually, persistently and without reasonable grounds, instituted vexatious legal proceedings in the Supreme Court or in the Provincial Court against the same or different persons, the court may, after hearing that person or giving him or her an opportunity to be heard, order that a legal proceeding must not, without leave of the court, be instituted by that person in any court.​

 

[the khat quaffer]

Huh. That tranny did a poor job taking care of his body.

As soon as they invent the tranny that is capable of taking care of its body, we can all go home