Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ihaveadick-jpg.588650

pussy6-jpg.588647

pp-jpg.588645
What's the story behind the people offering him supportive messages? Does Yaniv have orbiters or are people like Karrie Cooper just his friends? Their messages are straight up sycophantic.
 
that's what i'm wondering. the woman in the messages in the op is all "stay safe! transphobes and trump supporters are out there!" while he's blatantly a perv, yikes
That's the thing that's driving me up a wall. His questions are so obviously slanted for his fucking weird fantasies and fetishes, it has nothing to do with whether he's trans or not at that point. Just stop talking to the guy that wants to show underage girls how to insert tampons. :cryblood:
 
How long until he has to get the glove treatment from an ER Doctor to retrieve a sucked up tampon? He's probably got a few lost in space

I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets Toxic Shock Syndrome from his ridiculous anal plugging. To see this clown befallen by an errant, rotting tampon would be some wonderful poetic justice.
 
Last edited:
In that back and forth transcript he seemed obsessed with the idea that girls would be changing outside of the bathroom stalls in the women’s room, apparently at any possible time.

I know it’s clearly part of his weird restroom fantasies, but how much changing does he really expect is going on? Changing into what? It’s not even a locker room or a gym situation, does he think women just instantly undress when they enter a public bathroom?

I do like the idea of him wondering if trying to approach girls at the bus stop and ask them for pads would be considered weird or unusual.
 
Holy shit. And here I though the incels trooning out to creep on girls were just memes.

Rate me late, but has he ever thought of hiring a hooker?
I don’t think that would solve it. He seems obsessive over both women and BEING a woman. He clearly gets off to that odd vibrator “review” he wrote. I think he’s a pedo and an autogynephile.
 
Don’t give him ideas, no sex worker should have to have sex with a guy that’ll constantly be asking her about how she uses pads/tampons and how to help little girls with their periods while they’re fucking.
On the other hand if he really wants to experience the joys of menstruation, i think a few sex workers would be willing to take his money and kick him in the guts for three straight days. Really simulate that sexy, sexy cramping.
 
I feel bad for the women who still have his anonymous complaints about him because they wouldn't wax an obvious man, but might have no idea that they have an actual recourse to stop his harassment and bullshit. There's, what, fourteen of them still under the barrel of this investigation? And even though he withdrew that one complaint, it seems the evidence that he's not genuine that led to that won't get the Commission to pull his other complaints, because troon feels over reals.

Also, fuck Transscribe for defending him.
 
I feel bad for the women who still have his anonymous complaints about him because they wouldn't wax an obvious man, but might have no idea that they have an actual recourse to stop his harassment and bullshit. There's, what, fourteen of them still under the barrel of this investigation? And even though he withdrew that one complaint, it seems the evidence that he's not genuine that led to that won't get the Commission to pull his other complaints, because troon feels over reals.

"Gender identity or expression” is a recent addition to the BC Human Rights Code, so it's not yet clear how broadly it will be interpreted. Religion is also a protected class and there is a condition that it has to be a sincerely held belief, to attempt it from being abused (if one doesn't view the Human Rights Code as inherently abusive, but that's another debate), so I suspect that a similar approach may be taken with respect to gender identity.

However I think they are going to be very unlikely to question a complainant's stated gender identity unless they are given extreme reasons to do so, as obvious as this seems like BS to us. The Tribunal complaint form states that:

"Gender identity is a person's sense of themselves as male, female, both, in between or neither. It includes people who identify as transgender. Gender identity may be different or the same as the sex a person is assigned at birth. Gender expression is how a person presents their gender. This can include behavior and appearance including dress, hair make-up body language and voice. This can also include name and pronoun, such as he, or she or they. How a person presents their gender may not necessarily reflect their gender identity."

Emphasis added on the last bit there. Basically this is a license to be taken as sincere while asserting whatever gender identity one wants without having to put in any effort beyond that mere assertion.
 
"Gender identity or expression” is a recent addition to the BC Human Rights Code, so it's not yet clear how broadly it will be interpreted. Religion is also a protected class and there is a condition that it has to be a sincerely held belief, to attempt it from being abused (if one doesn't view the Human Rights Code as inherently abusive, but that's another debate), so I suspect that a similar approach may be taken with respect to gender identity.

However I think they are going to be very unlikely to question a complainant's stated gender identity unless they are given extreme reasons to do so, as obvious as this seems like BS to us. The Tribunal complaint form states that:

"Gender identity is a person's sense of themselves as male, female, both, in between or neither. It includes people who identify as transgender. Gender identity may be different or the same as the sex a person is assigned at birth. Gender expression is how a person presents their gender. This can include behavior and appearance including dress, hair make-up body language and voice. This can also include name and pronoun, such as he, or she or they. How a person presents their gender may not necessarily reflect their gender identity."

Emphasis added on the last bit there. Basically this is a license to be taken as sincere while asserting whatever gender identity one wants without having to put in any effort beyond that mere assertion.

So why would refusing to wax a cock and balls be discriminatory then? They're not refusing to wax male vaginas after all.
 
Back