Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

[Carcinogenesis]

She has 46,000 asks. That's not an archive.

True, but it exists in case the ask.fm just disappears overnight. Screenshots may also work rther than transcripts.

 

[Eggman's Ghost]

I think it's rather generous to even call this one a troon. He dresses and presents 100% male and uses his male name and male pronouns on all his social media and professional accounts. The only time he uses the Jessica persona is when he's creeping which leads me to believe he's just an old school pervert and not an autogenophile.

This. This guy isn't even a little bit trans. He's just a creep, and possibly a pedo, with a period fixation/fetish. The trans part is just his way in, so people won't immediately dismiss him for being a creepy fetishist.

One thing I noticed in the logs is that the people responding to his asinine "what if a LITTLE GIRL runs up to me in public and asks me how to insert things into her holes?" questions seem very patient with him, in a way that leads me to believe he also may be playing the autism or mental illness card with his internet friends to get them to put up with him for longer.

 

[knightlautrec]

His whole exchange over the tampons and kids Like 'yes but what if they ask me about their tampons!?' just made me think of this:

But it's 10 times creepier because he's actually a pedo who wants to put tampons into preteens.

 

[Le Pew]

The Canadian HRC are going to have to figure out a way to deal with these hucksters if they really want to protect the people that might truly deserve protection from discrimination. I can't imagine the public will put up with news like this forever if face of the people they're protecting look and behave like Oger and Yaniv.

 

[ComputerWife]

This. This guy isn't even a little bit trans. He's just a creep, and possibly a pedo, with a period fixation/fetish. The trans part is just his way in, so people won't immediately dismiss him for being a creepy fetishist.

One thing I noticed in the logs is that the people responding to his asinine "what if a LITTLE GIRL runs up to me in public and asks me how to insert things into her holes?" questions seem very patient with him, in a way that leads me to believe he also may be playing the autism or mental illness card with his internet friends to get them to put up with him for longer.

It wouldn’t surprise me if he is on the spectrum (and uses it as a way out) because of the backwards ideas he has about how menstration or how women in general work. No Johnathan; nobody who has to use tampons or pads is aroused by it

 

[AnOminous]

The Canadian HRC are going to have to figure out a way to deal with these hucksters if they really want to protect the people that might truly deserve protection from discrimination.

So far as I can tell, those utter loons are completely on board with the "child molester rights are human rights" bullshit.

 

[Cowpies]

This guy reminds me of a dude that used to call my old job asking about hair removal products. He claimed he was asking for his daughter but it quickly became obvious that he was calling for himself and while he never said anything terribly graphic it was equally obvious that he was getting off on it. We weren't allowed to hang up on him so we had to put up with him calling every night for several weeks. People can be fucking freaks.

 

[NimertiS]

I don't find my post here so...

 

[GH 356]

One thing I noticed in the logs is that the people responding to his asinine "what if a LITTLE GIRL runs up to me in public and asks me how to insert things into her holes?" questions seem very patient with him, in a way that leads me to believe he also may be playing the autism or mental illness card with his internet friends to get them to put up with him for longer.

I feel like this is underestimating how nonconfrontational most women are when it comes to conversations like these, even online. A lot of those girls are probably thinking "geez what the fuck" but don't want to go through direct confrontation with someone who comes off creepy.

 

[Le Pew]

So far as I can tell, those utter loons are completely on board with the "child molester rights are human rights" bullshit.

I can't imagine a big part of the Canadian populace is on board with this - but it's a neat trick they've done to criminalize discussions of it to make it the defacto opinion going forward. I'm not a big Jordan Peterson watcher but he's made good rebuttals on why this was a bad idea.

 

[pirate holiday]

This Robbie Rotten looking freak is trying to get stuff taken down all over the internet. With his Vordrak-like obsession over a girl band, what’s the over under that he attempts to come after Null?

 

[Cato]

The Canadian HRC are going to have to figure out a way to deal with these hucksters if they really want to protect the people that might truly deserve protection from discrimination. I can't imagine the public will put up with news like this forever if face of the people they're protecting look and behave like Oger and Yaniv.

To clarify, the provincial British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal is handling his complaints. Not that it makes that much of a difference, as the federal and provincial statutes and agencies are all terrible.

Anyways, you underestimate the complacency and passivity of the Canadian public. Among other things, 10 years ago the Alberta Human Rights Commission put a publisher through the ringer because some Muslim scumbag filed a complaint over him publishing the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons. He was ultimately cleared but had to spend tens of thousands of dollars in the process. And many honest businesspeople have gone through similar inquisitions because employees or customers filed bad faith complaints. This stuff has been going on for a long time, since well before freaks pretending to be transgender were a common occurance, and very few Canadians care.

It's infuriating, and I'd absolutely love for the human rights acts to be ripped up and the tribunals disbanded. But there's no chance of that happening any time soon.

 

[Le Pew]

To clarify, the provincial British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal is handling his complaints. Not that it makes that much of a difference, as the federal and provincial statutes and agencies are all terrible.

Anyways, you underestimate the complacency and passivity of the Canadian public. Among other things, 10 years ago the Alberta Human Rights Commission put a publisher through the ringer because some Muslim scumbag filed a complaint over him publishing the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons. He was ultimately cleared but had to spend tens of thousands of dollars in the process. And many honest businesspeople have gone through similar inquisitions because employees or customers filed bad faith complaints. This stuff has been going on for a long time, since well before freaks pretending to be transgender were a common occurance, and very few Canadians care.

It's infuriating, and I'd absolutely love for the human rights acts to be ripped up and the tribunals disbanded. But there's no chance of that happening any time soon.

I had no idea it was this bad. I'm an outsider and can't say I knew anything about this prior to the last few years when Peterson got the publicity here in the states and got featured on big podcasts. I can only hope the US never gets to this point (thanks to the 1st amendment) but it's definitely on the "wish list" of the extremist SJW crowd.

 

[TheMockTurtle]

Trusted nerd also somewhat recently reviewed some sex toys. Here is the archive link:

http://archive.is/gx84p

Most of this is plagiarism taken from the various devices websites. Great review, you lazy fuck.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Yeah I noticed that a lot of it seemed more like a product description from a webstore than an actual review. Unsurprising.

I also find it interesting he rated all the ones meant for women 4 or 5 out of 5 stars, but the only one for men 2.5 out of 5.

Speculation: He feverishly hopes women will buy the sex toys based on his reviews and tell him about it.

 

[Cowpies]

This Robbie Rotten looking freak is trying to get stuff taken down all over the internet. With his Vordrak-like obsession over a girl band, what’s the over under that he attempts to come after Null?

Hey, don't insult the late great Robbie Rotten.

 

[Cato]

I had no idea it was this bad. I'm an outsider and can't say I knew anything about this prior to the last few years when Peterson got the publicity here in the states and got featured on big podcasts. I can only hope the US never gets to this point (thanks to the 1st amendment) but it's definitely on the "wish list" of the extremist SJW crowd.

It would be clearly unconstitutional in US (as you alluded to).

I mentioned this in the thread before because a lot of Americans were confused by the Canadian legal system in light of what's going on with respect to Yaniv, and it got deleted, but I'll try again and risk the wraith of the mods because obviously this confusion persists (and I don't blame you guys as a Canadian; our human rights legislation is authoritarian and completely foreign to what the government is allowed to do in the US) and a bunch of people are reposting their deleted shitposts anyways:

The very first section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms contains the "limitations clause," which states that Charter rights are subject to "reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society." In other words, our government can and will infringe upon Charter rights if the courts deem it justifiable. Human rights tribunals have been expressly empowered by the limitations clause to infringe upon Charter rights for the sake of the complainants.

There is no limitations clause in the United States Bill of Rights, and your courts have consistently protected all sorts of expression and other acts that would clearly violate human rights acts in Canada.

The differences in the Canadian and US systems with respect to these matters are very significant and are constitutionally embedded, and it will take much more than a few activists to change anything in either country (which is great for the US and not so much for Canada).

 

[Ruin]

It would be clearly unconstitutional in US (as you alluded to).

I mentioned this in the thread before because a lot of Americans were confused by the Canadian legal system in light of what's going on with respect to Yaniv, and it got deleted, but I'll try again and risk the wraith of the mods because obviously this confusion persists (and I don't blame you guys as a Canadian; our human rights legislation is authoritarian and completely foreign to what the government is allowed to do in the US) and a bunch of people are reposting their deleted shitposts anyways:

The very first section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms contains the "limitations clause," which states that Charter rights are subject to "reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society." In other words, our government can and will infringe upon Charter rights if the courts deem it justifiable. Human rights tribunals have been expressly empowered by the limitations clause to infringe upon Charter rights for the sake of the complainants.

There is no limitations clause in the United States Bill of Rights, and your courts have consistently protected all sorts of expression and other acts that would clearly violate human rights acts in Canada.

The differences in the Canadian and US systems with respect to these matters are very significant and are constitutionally embedded, and it will take much more than a few activists to change anything in either country (which is great for the US and not so much for Canada).

Are most Canadians aware that the system is frequently abused by weirdos and those will ill intent or no?

 

[Cato]

Are most Canadians aware that the system is frequently abused by weirdos and those will ill intent or no?

I'm not aware of any public opinion polling about them or anything, but there are regular high profile controversies involving human rights commission or tribunal cases so they certainly have been a continued subject of debate here at least. But none of that has translated into any political pressure to significantly reform anything.

No politician has the balls to be branded "the guy who wants to dismantle human rights agencies and laws," even though those systems actually actively infringe upon civil liberties in practice.

 

[AnOminous]

No politician has the balls to be branded "the guy who wants to dismantle human rights agencies and laws," even though those systems actually actively infringe upon civil liberties in practice.

Those being real rights, unlike the fake "right to silence disagreement."