BallBuster
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2017
Perhaps he gave his first lesson to girls on how to use female hygiene products? I just threw up in my mouth a little.
Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
Perhaps he gave his first lesson to girls on how to use female hygiene products? I just threw up in my mouth a little.
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
Maybe JY got their tix to Kinkfest in Portland where he can live out those disgusting fantasies with like minded predators.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
Narcissism means 'turn that frown upside down' . Let's hope this is a false positive, based on negative pressure, if that makes sense.
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
It's obvious, he's trying to build a profile as a 'transgender activist' as that video so neatly pointed out, there's no online record of him doing anything except perving on little girls beginning their periods. It's late (and hopefully obvious) overcompensation to build a defensible web history to point to when called 'pedo'.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
Guess where JY was this evening. I hope there’s a video coming.
fraservalleynewsnetwork.com
JY's question for the town hall meeting. One more notch on his transgender activist belt I guess. Still waiting for a stream to show up locally.
"The Canadian Human Rights Act Section 13 was repealed due to unlikely coalitions of mainly reform conservatives and mainstream media mounted a concerted attack on the provision. In 2001, section 13(1) was expanded to apply to telecommunications over the Internet. The expansion of section 13 raised questions as to whether section 13 had been found by the Supreme Court, in a 1990 ruling, to be constitutional, was now restricting freedom of speech in ways that might be unconstitutional. In June 2012, the House voted to repeal Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which was finally repealed in June 2013 after a vote in the Senate.
Several Canadian and BC trans-exclusionary radical feminists use this repeal of section 13(1) to publish hateful content online with some creating a liability in a sense, where they state things like that it’s ok to deny service to a trans person, because as they state, “m are not w.” By these individuals publishing this content online, they create liability where these business owners might think that denying service to a trans person based on their transgender identity is ok, and denying service to any protected class is ok when it is not. This creates something known as “unlimited liability.” With this, however, no affected individual can file a Human Rights Complaint due to this online content because of there being no jurisdiction due to the repeal of section 13(1).
Will the Federal Government be re-enacting Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act which was pulled by the Harper government to prevent the loophole, which is, individuals, publishing hateful and discriminatory materials online to create hate towards the LGBTQ community? In addition to this, will the federal government put a ban on gender-based pricing, that is, pricing where services for men and women have different pricing, for example, haircuts?
This behavior of businesses being able to charge more, for a haircut for a woman than a man, for the same amount of hair and time spent, is discriminatory and shouldn’t take place in Langley BC, nor anywhere in Canada. I also apply the same question to our provincial MLA’s, will BC be taking action to modify the BC Human Rights Code to add a similar section 13 provision that applies to telecommunications over the Internet under Publication? Let’s see if the MLAs and MPs answer this tonight. "
Langley Township – Town Hall Meeting, Wednesday April 24 – FVN
fraservalleynewsnetwork.com
JY's question for the town hall meeting. One more notch on his transgender activist belt I guess. Still waiting for a stream to show up locally.
"The Canadian Human Rights Act Section 13 was repealed due to unlikely coalitions of mainly reform conservatives and mainstream media mounted a concerted attack on the provision. In 2001, section 13(1) was expanded to apply to telecommunications over the Internet. The expansion of section 13 raised questions as to whether section 13 had been found by the Supreme Court, in a 1990 ruling, to be constitutional, was now restricting freedom of speech in ways that might be unconstitutional. In June 2012, the House voted to repeal Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which was finally repealed in June 2013 after a vote in the Senate.
Several Canadian and BC trans-exclusionary radical feminists use this repeal of section 13(1) to publish hateful content online with some creating a liability in a sense, where they state things like that it’s ok to deny service to a trans person, because as they state, “m are not w.” By these individuals publishing this content online, they create liability where these business owners might think that denying service to a trans person based on their transgender identity is ok, and denying service to any protected class is ok when it is not. This creates something known as “unlimited liability.” With this, however, no affected individual can file a Human Rights Complaint due to this online content because of there being no jurisdiction due to the repeal of section 13(1).
Will the Federal Government be re-enacting Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act which was pulled by the Harper government to prevent the loophole, which is, individuals, publishing hateful and discriminatory materials online to create hate towards the LGBTQ community? In addition to this, will the federal government put a ban on gender-based pricing, that is, pricing where services for men and women have different pricing, for example, haircuts?
This behavior of businesses being able to charge more, for a haircut for a woman than a man, for the same amount of hair and time spent, is discriminatory and shouldn’t take place in Langley BC, nor anywhere in Canada. I also apply the same question to our provincial MLA’s, will BC be taking action to modify the BC Human Rights Code to add a similar section 13 provision that applies to telecommunications over the Internet under Publication? Let’s see if the MLAs and MPs answer this tonight. "
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
Guess where JY was this evening. I hope there’s a video coming.
Langley Township – Town Hall Meeting, Wednesday April 24 – FVN
JY's question for the town hall meeting. One more notch on his transgender activist belt I guess. Still waiting for a stream to show up locally.
"The Canadian Human Rights Act Section 13 was repealed due to unlikely coalitions of mainly reform conservatives and mainstream media mounted a concerted attack on the provision. In 2001, section 13(1) was expanded to apply to telecommunications over the Internet. The expansion of section 13 raised questions as to whether section 13 had been found by the Supreme Court, in a 1990 ruling, to be constitutional, was now restricting freedom of speech in ways that might be unconstitutional. In June 2012, the House voted to repeal Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which was finally repealed in June 2013 after a vote in the Senate.
Several Canadian and BC trans-exclusionary radical feminists use this repeal of section 13(1) to publish hateful content online with some creating a liability in a sense, where they state things like that it’s ok to deny service to a trans person, because as they state, “m are not w.” By these individuals publishing this content online, they create liability where these business owners might think that denying service to a trans person based on their transgender identity is ok, and denying service to any protected class is ok when it is not. This creates something known as “unlimited liability.” With this, however, no affected individual can file a Human Rights Complaint due to this online content because of there being no jurisdiction due to the repeal of section 13(1).
Will the Federal Government be re-enacting Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act which was pulled by the Harper government to prevent the loophole, which is, individuals, publishing hateful and discriminatory materials online to create hate towards the LGBTQ community? In addition to this, will the federal government put a ban on gender-based pricing, that is, pricing where services for men and women have different pricing, for example, haircuts?
This behavior of businesses being able to charge more, for a haircut for a woman than a man, for the same amount of hair and time spent, is discriminatory and shouldn’t take place in Langley BC, nor anywhere in Canada. I also apply the same question to our provincial MLA’s, will BC be taking action to modify the BC Human Rights Code to add a similar section 13 provision that applies to telecommunications over the Internet under Publication? Let’s see if the MLAs and MPs answer this tonight. "
Again about the haircut. I'd bet that's what the Hot Mess case is (unlike the others that had to do with genital waxing). Devyn Costineau wrote 12/11 that they needed another case LIKE all the other ones to make a case out of, and unsurprisingly, she picks this one.
And as to JY's demand, he clearly clumps KF in with "TERFs." Oh, unless we're "alt-right."
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
I'm confused by the Hot Mess case, I don't think JY would source out two salons with the same name so either they did some "free" work to clean up some malware for this Hot Mess salon and then asked for a hair cut and got turned down/charged more OR... JY is still harassing dozens of different salons.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
He blackmailed them with The Dirty by getting his FB friends to go there for free to clean up that "mess" by "that employee." I hope she or her counsel reads KF.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
She specifically didn't, because she said she'd get kicked off of youtube for doing so. Which only amplified everything more.
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
Nah girl. Your make up artist didn't match your face to your neck... #SisterBLEND
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
Holy shit that makeup is pancaked on and the skintone shift makes it look like one of my halfassed shoops. It just hit me, Mimi from The Drew Carey Show.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2015
Why don't troons shape their eyebrows? None of them do, and it's jarring. They cake on eye shadow but always leave their eyebrows looking like hairy caterpillars straggling across their face.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
It looks like someone did shape them to me. Look at the bottom of them. Especially his left eyebrow in the pic on the right. Not well mind you, but there is most certainly fuckery afoot. It looks like someone took a hair trimmer and just edged the bottom to a straight line.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
It must really chafe him that the best he can do to American critics is get them kicked from Twitter or other social media. I'm sure it really pisses him off he can't threaten us with jail for calling him by male pronouns.
Zeebie
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2019
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
http://archive.is/Maz9d
Oger has revised the blog piece again to include this:
"Note: Louise Nussac’s twitter was blocked 2 days before this piece was published. Alicia Hendley’s twitter was blocked on Saturday 20 April, the day after this post appeared. I would not be surprised these interventions are related to Yaniv. "
Oger has revised the blog piece again to include this:
"Note: Louise Nussac’s twitter was blocked 2 days before this piece was published. Alicia Hendley’s twitter was blocked on Saturday 20 April, the day after this post appeared. I would not be surprised these interventions are related to Yaniv. "
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2017
He has a makeup artist, huh? Just another woman he's made professionally obligated to touch him.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2017
Yikes. TFW it looks like you're wearing a shit wig but it's your natural hair.
PS Jon, she's a makeup artist, not a magician.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Hahahaha that discoloration around the mouth! Bitch is GREEN.
Remember kids: Just because someone can smear some pretty colors on your eyelids, doesn't mean they're a good MUA. Color correction is literally baby's first youtube tutorial.