Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

Casta Spersions said:
Hahaha, I am absolutely loving this asshole being exposed for exactly what he is.

Did anyone else catch the part about "lifelogger" - a small wearable 1080p camera that "logs your memories" then uploads them via Wi-Fi?

In light of his serial creeping and change room obsession that's very interesting indeed.

Tampon strings are considered to be extremely personal. One of the most mortifying things as a female is a visible string outside the bathing suit, or anything else involving visible evidence of being on your period.

Trusted nerd also somewhat recently reviewed some sex toys. Here is the archive link:

http://archive.li/gx84p

The original article:

https://trustednerd.com/2018/08/12/sex-toys-galore-summer-2018-review/

And some choice quotes:
"Not only does this vibe looks sexy, it feels sexy. I put this in my purse and whip it out when ever I need some vaginal stimulation in the middle of the day in a private place. It’s small, discreet and full of power. I just wish it was easier to insert."
"It’s an anal vibrator, but can also be used in your tight little wet pussy. "
"I fucking love this clit stimulator! Gets my clitoris going like crazy, I literally fell in love with this product as soon as I saw it and started using it. This bad boy is by Inmi, and I can’t get enough of it. Just typing about it wants me to whip this bad boy out and start using it, I get wet just thinking about it. You can also insert the other end in your pussy for amazing stimulation."

Also, the business address is the same one the Morgane Oger Foundation uses, including suite number. 170-422 Richards St, Vancouver BC. Some people are saying it's a po box but those usually have, you know, a po box number. Others are saying it seems to be a shared workspace or networking hub? Maybe it is a government paid resource for litigious troons?

ETA: I think he only made his Twitter private in the last day, for the poster above who was wondering why.
Click to expand...
sperginity said:
In oger v whatcott they ruled for troon feelings over religious rights. Devyn whatserface was on that case too. It wasn't hard for them at all. That case involved a jesus freak guy telling people that Oger, who was running for office, is a man. They wouldn't allow anyone to even discuss oger's biological sex, and iirc the ruling they wrote for oger said that pointing out biology "denies the reality of transpeople" and "accuses transpeople of being deceptive and immoral", so they are obviously treating yaniv very differently. It is because yaniv makes them look bad. The members of the rights tribunal care much more about continuing to fine canadians for wrong think than anything else. The continuation of the human rights tribunal is the ultimate good to the kind of person who would voluntarily serve on it (an SJW, basically). They are steeped in postmodern bullshit so they have no problem with being hypocritical or inconsistent. I have a feeling that they might rule in Yaniv's favor for the complaints that don't involve brazillian waxing. Most people aren't going to give a fuck about the difference between giving him money for an arm wax or a ball wax, being legally compelled to travel to yaniv's house and touch any part of his body is disgusting and wrong.
Click to expand...

There's a lot of truth there. It's important to realise that the people on Tribunal aren't stupid, they're fully committed SJW's but they're not going to put their cushy little gravy train at risk by giving a big payout to someone who demonstrable a pedophile.

So I tend to agree with you, I think they'll find for JY in some minor way, but dismiss the more serious charges.

That way they can go back to dragging practicing Christians in front of their little star tribunal and they'll go back to business as normal.

This tribunal is similar to a lot of similar bodies in the UK, they want a round of applause when they hand out a judgement, they don't want to face any serious public criticism.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Caecia, Brain Problems, illhavetwo and 8 others
So... Yaniv is trying to get Kiwi Farms scrubbed off the internet (according to Josh's current livestream)??

Now that Josh has registered himself as an ISP, this might significantly increase his power level. What if Josh is the guy who winds up creating a completely separate internet -- a FreeNet?? That would be hilarious if Yaniv inadvertently turns Josh into a very rich man with an obscene amount of power.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: welcometotherock, Archie_Kimkicker, Xozx and 11 others
Trig.Point said:
It's important to realise that the people on Tribunal aren't stupid
Click to expand...

In some cases this is an understatement: Devyn clerked at the Supreme Court of Canada, so she must have been one of the top law students in the country, grades-wise.

It does baffle me though that someone with a golden ticket resume like that, who could do basically whatever they want, would choose to be a HRT goon.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Brain Problems, Picklechu and 6 others
I'm not sure how to archive a YouTube video - but this was just retweeted by the JCCF.

www.therebel.media

John Carpay: Media boycotting transgender bikini wax trial

transgender-case-brazilian-bikini-wax-british-columbia-human-rights-complaint-lawyer-john-carpay-ideology-rebel-media-sheila-gunn-reid-nation-builder-gender-hard-wax-soft-female-to-male-transition
www.therebel.media www.therebel.media

www.youtube.com

John Carpay: Media boycotting transgender bikini wax trial | Sheila Gunn Reid

http://bit.ly/2XI55DR On this week's episode of The Gunn Show, Laywer John Carpay joined me to talk about the “right” to a Brazilian bikini wax in a case tha...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: User Name, GossipGirl, PeckingOrder and 11 others
Ruh roh!
838685


Edited: I can't believe a stupid tribunal coverage on Twitter is the most riveting thing I've read in a long damn time.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Pips Star, Caecia, vertexwindi and 38 others
Titan Lithos said:
Ruh roh!
View attachment 838685

Edited: I can't believe a stupid tribunal coverage on Twitter is the most riveting thing I've read in a long damn time.
Click to expand...

Right. I'm over here refresh refresh refresh...

Seriously, why didn't the Member ask JY or Mama Yaniv to show their phones if they were so innocent? And why don't they have to turn in their phones at the start of the hearing?

SO MANY QUESTIONS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sourceress, ThisCorner and AbraCadaver
Wow. Holy fuck. I mentioned some pages back a mother/son duo this reminded me of. That texting stunt was exactly something they'd have done, and in front of a judge, too. Mommy has to feed him lines so he can get it right, her dunderheaded son needs to know mommy's opinion on what questions he should ask!

In that particular case I knew long ago, both of them had a taste for cocaine. I always thought that was the source of their belligerence and sadism, but unless there's a coke habit none of us know anything about, it seems you don't need that excuse to be this shameless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brain Problems, Dread First, PeckingOrder and 5 others
A Name But Backwards said:
Piss off ya old hag
View attachment 838694
Click to expand...
Yeah they don’t demand you follow their beliefs, they’re just saying they won’t do things for you that makes THEM violate their own beliefs. You absolutely mental old sow.

But no this was NEVER about racism! How can you say that about long-suffering mummy and her blessed little chubby cherubic baby bo- I mean sweet young daughter?

These two. I swear she makes him sleep in her bed when she has nightmares.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Pips Star, Caecia, Brain Problems and 16 others
Here is the plain text of the most recent tweet updates from goinglikeelsie. I'll update it whenever I see a new tweet.

Member says answer doesn't go to limits of case but how SG sets boundaries around service.

Member asks SGH: what does your religion say about people with both male and female genitals.

SGH -never heard of it
--------------------------------

JY says they want to rephrase same question and ask again, Member says no.

JY? How does Sikh religion define sex, genitals, brain sex, chromosomes?


SGH - don't understand
JY? If born with male, female or intersex?

Lawyer interjects and asks if this is a fair question as very small % of people with both - 1 in 10 million.

--------------------------------
Note: everyone seems to be referring to intersex as having both sets of genitals.


Or as if it means you are both sexes at once.

My understanding is that Disorders of Sexual Development are quite rare and having both male and female genitals is almost non-existent. Instead there are disorders that ONLY males have and disorders that ONLY females have .

--------------------------------
Intersex is not a third sex or in between male and female. And intersex people have asked over and over to be left out of trans debate. OK, sorry for off tangent but that really bugged me. Back to JY?

--------------------------------
JY starts ? with statement "it is known there is no single measure of sex". Cut off by Member, shouldn't question be how SGH defines male and female?

SGH - ?

Lawyer asks to clarify, is about definition of bio sex?
Member asks when you talk about no services women to men...

2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
Reply 2 Retweet 1 Like 10 Direct message

--------------------------------
SGH - ?
Member asks how are you defining female or male, ok to say that you don't know
SGH - do not understand
Lawyer - All services men to men, women to women
SGH - not sure
Lawyer - how to decide man or woman
SGH - look at how they dress
--------------------------------

Lawyer - physical differences
SGH - definitely physical structure, if a beard, sexually as well
JY? 5 ways of determining sex, if have 4 of 5 ways...

JY is stopped by Lawyer who tells Member that someone is having covert communication with JY!

--------------------------------
(I had heard a few texty sounding noises but ignored as was concentrating on notes)

Lawyer says that JY's parent is communicating with JY. Perhaps feeding questions. JY's parent denies, JY denies. JY's parent is quite angry and there's some back and forth.


--------------------------------
JY's parent has to leave room and complains loudly as leaving. Something like, why do we have to follow their beliefs, why don't they have to follow ours.

Member repeats that no one is allowed to send or receive communication while in room while hearing is in progress.

JY? Starts five ways to define sex question, says some are not accurate, ask if someone is assigned male at birth but takes puberty blockers, hormones and has had SRS, so 3 of the 5 ways, how would your religion determine their sex?

--------------------------------
Lawyer objects, say ? presupposes that JY's 5 way sex statement is correct and that SGH has already answered question about how he defines sex. JY is not an expert and is still making arguments, not asking ?s about facts. Member moves JY on.

--------------------------------
JY? Define sex by name, secondary sex characteristics, hormones? Member says valid ? but SGH has already answered. Asks SGH is they want to add to their answer.
SGH - already said everything

--------------------------------
JY starts next question but is interrupted by Member, asks if someone is transmitting to JY - JY denies. JY says they can see that someone in hearing is transmitting on Twitter. JY says my Twitter handle! I am aghast! I raise my hand and identify myself.


--------------------------------
Tell Member that I have not been on Twitter during hearing, tweets re JY are from last night, JY says untrue. I offer to show tweets to Member. Member twigs that actually JY is on Twitter during hearing. JY was allowed to use laptop only for notes - not to be online.

--------------------------------
Member chastises JY - stay off Twitter, stay offline, tells them to go into airplane mode. Hearing continues.
JY? Sex can be defined by secondary sex characteristics?
SGH - yes
JY? - those things can change?

--------------------------------
At this point Parent opens door, want to talk (loudly) about their beliefs - stopped. Parent tells JY that they are leaving building now - leaves room...but not building.
JY? Why base religious values on things that change?
SGH - religion not made by me, it is what it is

--------------------------------
JY? Asks physical sex question again?
SGH - already answered Member tells JY to move on.
As JY starts next question, we can hear Parent arguing loudly with someone (staff?) in the hallway.

--------------------------------
JY? Says for someone to be trans, it is not necessary to take hormones, or have surgery. Example, cis with no ovaries is not trans - if a female has no ovaries, does SGH say male or female?
Lawyer objects, already explained how he views sex
JY - important to know what basis

--------------------------------
Member says ? should be - for your wife touching someone else, if they are trans with female identity but male genitals...
SGH - that is male
JY? Is sex in religion only genitals S
GH - already answered Member says I agree, last questions.

--------------------------------
JY? How can genitals apply in a service not on the genitals
SGH starts to answer - in our culture, it is everything...
Stops as Member says we already have the rules about how he defines sex & gender
--------------------------------
JY? In XXX (municipality where SG lives and works), to have a home business, you have to have a separate entry from house, how is SG's business laid out?

Member says not relevant, SGH's testimony is over. 10 min break and then SG herself is next.
--------------------------------
Back on record. Before SG testimony @JurisCameron talks about covert communication between JY and Parent. Lawyer will apply for (finding of?) transmission of communication - says that a number of people can testify to it. Member asks what basis?

--------------------------------
Lawyer wants to modify scope of publication ban. Member says publication ban holds for now, makes sure JY turns off wifi. JY then says that they are scared that people associated with Meghan Murphy will attend. Says worried cause they got her banned. Member makes no comment.

--------------------------------
Note: want to clarify that JY may have been allowed to be online, just not communicate or receive communications. Want to be accurate. Lawyer wants Tribunal to record that JY has large Trans Pride flag draped on table in front of them - bit of back & forth, JY removes flag.

--------------------------------
SG is sworn in. Lawyer tells SG that is is her time to explain to the Tribunal - is interrupted by JY's parent who comes in & (quite forcefully) throws note (very thick, folded, can see from where I am sitting, large writing) on table next to Member.
--------------------------------
Member rejects report and makes record of JY's Parent giving note and Member rejecting. Parent leaves hearing and building. Going to have a break - went to send a text and was worried I was running out of characters!
🙃
Back shortly.

edit- god damn, this is a shit show even by kangaroo court standards :story:
edit 2- I got some shit to do, I will copy and paste the rest later.
edit 3- added the last two tweets

Cato said:
In some cases this is an understatement: Devyn clerked at the Supreme Court of Canada, so she must have been one of the top law students in the country, grades-wise.

It does baffle me though that someone with a golden ticket resume like that, who could do basically whatever they want, would choose to be a HRT goon.
Click to expand...

I feel comfortable saying social justice is a cult at this point. I've seen more than one otherwise intelligent person nuke their career or personal life because they feel morally obligated to do so after taking too many humanities classes in college. Once someone has invested that much in a cult, they have a very hard time leaving. If anything would shake her faith, it is Yaniv.

PuckishRogue said:
Some intersex people literally only have the smallest differences from non intersex people. It's such a wide spectrum.
Click to expand...

Many people consider hypospadias (when the urethra is on the bottom of the dick instead of the end) an intersex condition. People include it in their definition to inflate the % of the population they can claim is intersex.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Pips Star, Caecia, vertexwindi and 29 others
sixthwave said:
Right. I'm over here refresh refresh refresh...

Seriously, why didn't the Member ask JY or Mama Yaniv to show their phones if they were so innocent? And why don't they have to turn in their phones at the start of the hearing?

SO MANY QUESTIONS.
Click to expand...
Jon is too incompetent to make up viable questions, and Mama knows that. That is why she's spoonfeeding them to him.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Brain Problems, welcometotherock, The Woman Without Nerves and 5 others
Larry Anon said:
So... Yaniv is trying to get Kiwi Farms scrubbed off the internet (according to Josh's current livestream)??

Now that Josh has registered himself as an ISP, this might significantly increase his power level. What if Josh is the guy who winds up creating a completely separate internet -- a FreeNet?? That would be hilarious if Yaniv inadvertently turns Josh into a very rich man with an obscene amount of power.
Click to expand...

Null hasn't stated that any one person or group in particular got him fucked over in this case. Just because Yaniv is the current highest profile cow spewing milk everywhere dosen't mean he's the source of the sneak attack, it could just as easily be Vordrak or Akiva any other of the very large group of cows with their jimmies rustled who hate the Farms with a passion well beyond reason.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: welcometotherock, Picklechu, Cryin RN and 6 others
Screenshot (51).png


Translation: You're making this so complicated that you're now making shit up. Get a move on.

BTW, is there a proposition to change the Stella Awards to the Yaniv Awards? At this point in time, Yaniv's lawsuit makes other frivolous lawsuits look quite normal. Considering that the Stella case was not actually that lol worthy, I say that we rename the awards after someone who actually makes frivolous lawsuits.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Brain Problems, welcometotherock, A Owl and 4 others
General Disarray said:
Speaking of intersex (as has just been brought up in the hearing), the only person I've heard of that I think is truly intersex is that person in "I Think We're Alone Now," the documentary about two Tiffany-obsessed men (highly recommend); Kelly McCormick looks and acts like what I visualize when I hear that term.

I have never seen any photos of the genitalia of intersex people (using the definition that confuses some people who think that they have both external sets somehow) AND I DON'T (particularly) WANT TO.
Click to expand...

I'm sure that whatever true intersex people have going on downstairs, it is worlds less disgusting and offensive than a NeoVag or a Little Debbie Flesh Roll. (also, I wanted to see that stalker film and forgot, so thanks for the reminder)
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Caecia, Osyth Osyth, Marvin and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back