Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

Found someone in Benjamin Boyce's replies with more info on Jonny.
View attachment 851697View attachment 851700
View attachment 851701
View attachment 851705
View attachment 851708View attachment 851710View attachment 851712View attachment 851713
I understand that somebody has forwarded this info to the JCCF. :story:

Remember: if Johnny hadn't brought those women to kangaroo court and then trolled people about it on his social media the girl wouldn't have posted those tweets.
 
Cost of living makes it impossible for them to just tard cum the system here, need LoLsuits to live. Rent's now 1000$ a month for a 1 bedroom in Langley, its exceptional. Even with owning his own place I doubt that fat fuck could afford his meals and tampon habit on Canadas disability alone.

Edit: if they make extra income they have to report it too I'm pretty sure and itll lower their cheques.
Also why there are so many homeless people in major Canadian cities like Vancouver or Toronto.

In other countries, many of them would be sitting in their little rent controlled apartment and somehow manage to get by on a limited budget. In Canada disability is so low that it’s really hard to survive on it.

I’m all for working for a living too, but that’s just not possible for everyone.
If he's on disability he and his mother are almost certainly defrauding the government. The condo purchase is new and there is no way he could afford it on his own on disability. For one, you are only allowed to have a certain amount in savings and it's not nearly enough for a condo and two, even if it was enough for a down payment, good luck getting a mortgage when your only income is disability. Mommy has plenty of ways of giving her special little boy all the income he needs without him having a paper trail to declare. I'm not sure it's even clear he's on disability, but if he is, there is absolutely no way he lives like he does without disability fraud.
 
I understand that somebody has forwarded this info to the JCCF. :story:

Remember: if Johnny hadn't brought those women to kangaroo court and then trolled people about it on his social media the girl wouldn't have posted those tweets.
I'm was curious about those messages. So I did I checked my FB messages from 2015 and the profile pics update to that person's current pic so she must have screenshot those recently. From the linked Instagram account I found 1 picture tagged in Oregon. For a 19 year old she doesn't Tween or Gram that often.
 
The fact that so many people are turning up is helpful, it's going to make it harder for the Tribunal to clamp down on those recording the proceedings. Also it would be a major step for them to close the gallery, and something that would almost certainly attract more scrutiny.

It would be an action the media would have to respond to, at the very least you might expect a request for a transcript of the hearings to be made. Other people have previously mentioned the expense of using one of the approved transcription services, almost like the BCHT don't want people to do it.





I'm a bit vague about what Authority the BCHT has against people not party to the case. I was surprised that they were able to issue a publication ban against mentioning Yaniv's name.

A tribunal in the UK or Ireland would not be able to take action on its own part, so say they wanted to take action against people videoing them behaving like idiots, the Tribunal itself would need to make a complaint to the Police or courts.

Does anyone know if this is the case with the BCHT? I'm curious because they're starting to get so much criticism they may be tempted to lash out.



The HRT are recorded with mics on the desks.
You can request copies of those when they are available.

Youtube transcribes audio you upload if you have that enabled on the channel. Accuracy depends on how clear the recording is.

There is also free audio to text applications that will do it as well and output it to a text file.


There's a protest planned for the next Tribunal on the 26th of July. I'll be there for that
if that goes down I'll have my camera out to record.
 
If he's on disability he and his mother are almost certainly defrauding the government. The condo purchase is new and there is no way he could afford it on his own on disability. For one, you are only allowed to have a certain amount in savings and it's not nearly enough for a condo and two, even if it was enough for a down payment, good luck getting a mortgage when your only income is disability. Mommy has plenty of ways of giving her special little boy all the income he needs without him having a paper trail to declare. I'm not sure it's even clear he's on disability, but if he is, there is absolutely no way he lives like he does without disability fraud.

As far I understand, they come from money, no?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ihatechildren
Also why there are so many homeless people in major Canadian cities like Vancouver or Toronto.

In other countries, many of them would be sitting in their little rent controlled apartment and somehow manage to get by on a limited budget. In Canada disability is so low that it’s really hard to survive on it.

I’m all for working for a living too, but that’s just not possible for everyone.

For people skimming to get caught up ignore this!

There are a number of compounding factors for why there are so many homeless here. Obvious answers include the cost of living is just so high that it wouldnt be politically popular to just give people enough to rent their own place. Second is municipalities are responsible for building homeless shelters (with funding provided by higher levels of government) but local NIMBY groups are very strong here to the point where Maple Ridge opted to not building a shelter that was going to cost them nothing.

There are other factors that I think also really contribute to it. First there was an excellent post earlier in this thread about the shuttering of mental health facilities that led to a dramatic rise in homelessness. Vancouver is also a major dumping ground for the homeless. Prairie cities ran programs where they would give their homeless one way bus tickets to Vancouver.

Two more things to keep in mind is Vancouver is a major port city and has become a dumping ground for fentanyl from Asia. There was also a lot of misguided funding given out. Lots of money spent on programs that don't have the best outcomes because they sounded nice but didn't hold up to actual scrutiny.

This seems like a pretty big derail from the topic of racist troon pedophiles. Just wanted to answer your question!
 
As far I understand, they come from money, no?
That's my understanding but also according to the government, Jonny boy and his mom are two different people. If she has all the money in her accounts, he would still be eligible to apply on his own for himself. It's not assumed it's his money. They won't ask about his mother's accounts. It's extremely likely that he would apply for the extra money even though he absolutely doesn't need it. I mean, why not? It's his HUUUUMON RIIIIIIGHTS

Edit: WG Kitty is right, homelessness is a nuanced issue with many causes but the disability issue is absolutely one of them. The number of mentally ill people on Toronto streets, for instance, is absurdly high.
 
Youtube transcribes audio you upload if you have that enabled on the channel. Accuracy depends on how clear the recording is.
The YT auto transcript is good, but absolutely trash for this situation as it has a very hard time separating two overlapping speakers and has to have very clean audio to get it done. Also, any second language english speaker will reek havoc with the transcribe with YT as it needs again clean audio.
 
What a pest...
Screenshot_20190721-121452_Chrome.jpg
 
For everyone wondering about how effective the JCCFs defense has been, you have to admit that getting the publication ban lifted was a master stroke.

This story is no doubt now the most publicized case the BCHRT has ever adjudicated over and public discourse is strongly in the defendants favour. The tribunal still needs to appear to be legitamite and is in the spot light on this one. If there is anything making me think that Yaniv will lose its how much negative media attention he is getting. 🌈🌈

I have a feeling that the BCHRT is going to be under a fucking microscope from here on out. People are going to research their past cases and learn about all of the absolutely retarded decisions/judgements they've made in the past. This might be optimistic, but I can see a lot of the members being replaced over this. Literally every member of the BCHRT is a far-left nut job, and this case could set a precedent that calls for a more "balanced" membership in the future.
 
I have a feeling that the BCHRT is going to be under a fucking microscope from here on out. People are going to research their past cases and learn about all of the absolutely exceptional decisions/judgements they've made in the past. This might be optimistic, but I can see a lot of the members being replaced over this. Literally every member of the BCHRT is a far-left nut job, and this case could set a precedent that calls for a more "balanced" membership in the future.

It should absolutely be a panel overseeing these things, representation from all sides.
 
I have a feeling that the BCHRT is going to be under a fucking microscope from here on out. People are going to research their past cases and learn about all of the absolutely exceptional decisions/judgements they've made in the past. This might be optimistic, but I can see a lot of the members being replaced over this. Literally every member of the BCHRT is a far-left nut job, and this case could set a precedent that calls for a more "balanced" membership in the future.
I wouldn't be surprised if JCCF were constantly monitoring the new schedules.
 
There are other factors that I think also really contribute to it. First there was an excellent post earlier in this thread about the shuttering of mental health facilities that led to a dramatic rise in homelessness. Vancouver is also a major dumping ground for the homeless. Prairie cities ran programs where they would give their homeless one way bus tickets to Vancouver.

They literally closed down their largest mental institution (Riverview) so that they could rent it out to the film industry and shoot movies & tv shows there. None of the money they make from Hollywood trash goes toward mental health initiatives.
 
I have a feeling that the BCHRT is going to be under a fucking microscope from here on out. People are going to research their past cases and learn about all of the absolutely exceptional decisions/judgements they've made in the past. This might be optimistic, but I can see a lot of the members being replaced over this. Literally every member of the BCHRT is a far-left nut job, and this case could set a precedent that calls for a more "balanced" membership in the future.

The human rights tribunal is a fucking joke where they can decide what happened inside of your head and make you pay. Talk about an Orwellian nightmare.

Look at the case decided on last month where a hair dresser sued great clips after she was let go. Here are the case highlights: woman gets a job at great clips after lying on her resume about completing barber college, receives a significant number of customer complaints, is slower than what is required, and is let go while still inside her probation period. Here is the kicker - the week before being let go informs her employer she is pregnant and will need to go on maternity leave in a number of months. The tribunal comes back with a decision that yes she is likely to be let go because she can't cut hair BUT decides that the Great Clips had thought about her being pregnant when deciding to fire her so awarded in her favour a huge amount.

Incase you are thinking that maybe the franchise owner has a history of firing women before maternity leave, no they do not. In fact had several hair dressers say they were incredibly well supported when they had their leave.

It's an abortion of justice.
 
Firstly I'd just like to say fuck me its taken a day to catch up from where I was last in the thread, Secondly, Jesus Christ has this shit blown up, heck i even saw imam tawhidi commenting on Yaniv's faggotry, I'm pleasantly surprised to see this hit the boiling point it has because the pressure has sure as fuck blown the lid off this little story that's for sure. The real question is can Yaniv possibly handle this much heat? Is neck-rope an increasing possibility? as this guy goes from being a niche laughing stock limited to an autistic cyber stalking forum, disgruntled Terfs and the unfortunate locals that must fend off the ogre himself, to now being mocked across a large segment of the conservative political sphere online. :story:
 
Disability in the USA is very different than it is in other countries where you're basically just handed it in 3-6 months because you don't get some paltry $500 per month. You will qualify for a minimum of $776 per month (the equivalent of minimum wage 24 hours a week) even if you've never worked a day in your life. If you've spent the past 10 years working minimum wage 40 hours a week you'll qualify for $988 per month (the equivalent of minimum wage 32 hours a week). If you've earned higher wages you'll qualify for more. Because of this there is a higher risk of abuse because unlike in other countries disability can easily pay more than working some part time job burger flipping.

You'd probably get more than that in the UK.


When he returned to work following national outcry in the summer, the type-2 diabetes sufferer collapsed after suffering a 'mini stroke'.

It came after his wife miscarried their child, claiming over-exercising was to blame.

The couple, who weighed 55st between them when they appeared on the Channel 5 documentary in January, have previously revealed that they receive £2,000 a month from the state - a combination of Disability Living Allowance, Jobseeker's Allowance and other entitlements.

£2000 a month is $2500. They're also not paying rent or (much) tax, unlike most of the UK population. And this is for people who've made themselves unemployable by eating too much.

Holy shit, at times I kind of get the image people are reaching with these pedo accusations and he might just be so autistic and clueless he doesn't get it why asking certain questions from young girls or demanding for +12 topless pool party doesn't look good, but then there is this shit that makes his motivations more sinister or that wouldn't be justified with being socially inept autist. Especially if that creepy "lol I fuck underage girls cuz they have tight pussy" shit is true.

Him being a socially inept autist and him being a predatory pedophile are not mutually exclusive things. There's a study someone linked to where autism, transsexuality and pedophilia seem to go together.
 
Last edited:
The human rights tribunal is a fucking joke where they can decide what happened inside of your head and make you pay. Talk about an Orwellian nightmare.

Look at the case decided on last month where a hair dresser sued great clips after she was let go. Here are the case highlights: woman gets a job at great clips after lying on her resume about completing barber college, receives a significant number of customer complaints, is slower than what is required, and is let go while still inside her probation period. Here is the kicker - the week before being let go informs her employer she is pregnant and will need to go on maternity leave in a number of months. The tribunal comes back with a decision that yes she is likely to be let go because she can't cut hair BUT decides that the Great Clips had thought about her being pregnant when deciding to fire her so awarded in her favour a huge amount.

Incase you are thinking that maybe the franchise owner has a history of firing women before maternity leave, no they do not. In fact had several hair dressers say they were incredibly well supported when they had their leave.

It's an abortion of justice.
Not sure why the part where you replied to me is not quoting for me but you're absolutely right. Income recieved as gifts is still income and has to be reported. Below a certain amount and they won't care but you still have to report it. It's not that it isn't enforced, it's that a gift of cash has no paperwork associated with it so why report it at all? Mommy isn't going to rat him out. Not reporting income is fraud but gifts are really hard to catch and/or prove.
 
Why is having your crotch hair ripped off “gender affirming care”? Not all women chose to do this.

Most women don’t regularly have Brazilian waxing, unless maybe for an upcoming beach vacation or some special romantic event. It’s really only been something that’s become more common in the last decade.

A Brazilian wax hurts like a mother fucker, is expensive and most women don’t like a stranger all up their lady bits and ass. Facial or leg waxing is fairly common, genital waxing is not. A bikini wax was a common thing, where hair is just removed around the bikini line, but getting all their pubic hair removed, taint, ass, etc... is far more extreme and uncommon.

I’ve known women to endure a full it for a big vacation or honeymoon, but many do it once and never again due to the pain.

I’m not sure how porn stars do it regularly. Shaving is preferred for most women who want to remove pubic hair.
As far I understand, they come from money, no?

No, they are low rent, tacky Israeli jews. Maybe they were able to sell the house after Daddy died and get enough to buy the condos in Langley but Johnny and Mama are low life shysters trying to grift and scam every cent they can.

If Johnny had money he wouldn’t be trying to desperately extort money from immigrants and engage in scammy SM marketing. He’d be taking long holidays in Thailand or the Philippines and renting ten year old girls for hide the tampon slumber parties.

Johnny is trying desperately to scam and hustle every cent he can.
 
Not sure why the part where you replied to me is not quoting for me but you're absolutely right. Income recieved as gifts is still income and has to be reported. Below a certain amount and they won't care but you still have to report it. It's not that it isn't enforced, it's that a gift of cash has no paperwork associated with it so why report it at all? Mommy isn't going to rat him out. Not reporting income is fraud but gifts are really hard to catch and/or prove.
Sorry, I edited after posting because I realized I might have been talking out of my ass. I'm no tax expert and don't want to Yaniv up the thread by lying.
 
Back