hello all!
so in light of some information posted publicly, i would like to talk about the mimi yanagi situation for a second.
from the information i was shown about the irl name involving mimi (jordan) i was shocked bc that was never a name we heard up til now.
WHEN ASKING for anyone who worked with her in the past, mostly artists I knew she's commissioned, i will say that when she commissioned them, the name was tied to a personal account using the name on the forms.
aka Alexandria.
i am not sure if paypal defaults to her "legal" name even if she changed it, but it does make me question if Jordan and mimi are truly the same person at all.
whether its true or not? when dealing with drama? its exhausting we all know that, so ill be blunt.
I will be muting anything about this and moving on.
because frankly this is quite a bit to be dealing with and its getting way too real.
was i lied to? was i deceived? i have no clue, and honestly this entire topic is very blackpilling.
i knew mimi online for about 2 years, i have no idea what shes like irl, but i know over voicechat and from seeing her seldomly. she didn't present as a man or as a male.
being said...I cannot continue posting about this and continuing to defend the information at hand until I get evidence showing its not true.
mimi can tell me it was fictional, and claim all she would like, but until i see a form showing me it was for "Section 62 of the Coroner's and Justice Act" which is for fictional artwork and nothing related to actual csm...
then what am I supposed to do? blindly trust her? I know her?
i don't believe mimi to be a monster at face value, but ultimately it comes down to if mimi is innocent, guilty, or prosecuted.
I can say this: if mimi is prosecuted and arrested on charges for actual csm, i will not support it.
if shes not? good on her, that will be her rodeo to wrangle if she chooses to return.
this drama is stressful, and I constantly posting about it isn't going to save her or help her case, its just fueling a fire that isn't going to stop between sides of twitter that REALLY seem to hate each other.
frankly! i am way too employed to be involved in this, and dont need to garner twitter clout to support mimi, nor do I really care for it.
"ooh look mummy the funny number is going up on the twitter account i solely use to look at vhub porn"
I frankly do not care for the numbers, I cared for letting my friends truth be heard because she wouldn't do it herself,
but during that ive realized i cannot continue to baby her and she needs to stand up and set the record straight herself. not me.
i leave the choices up to the court of public opinion.
but know this: whether mimi is trans, not trans, girl boy? thats still a human being at the end of the day
one with some very wild fucking tastes in porn...
unless its proven that shes been actual kids and looking at actual kids? its not really my place to condemn her, validate her, vouch for her, or anyone else for that matter.
this drama is way beyond me and should be left to those who have the time and effort to search more into this information.
i am biased bc i know her, and even with official documents being shown, I cannot in good faith, defend someone without seeing the whole truth.
thank you for your time.
goon
P.S.
if she does have proof that it was specifically for section 62, that would be the last bit id post about this, AND THAT WOULD make it clear that it was for solely and only fictional content, and at that point and only at that point, we should ALL be concerned for anime enjoyers in the UK regardless of whether youre on anti or a pusher. i still believe if its art on a canvas, you shouldn't be banned from enjoying it in the privacy of your own home unless its tied to hurting real people or crime. I am not your "anime is pedophilia" scapegoat, i am just a dude who likes bad bitches and online fitties, not your moral monarch or the pioneer for free speech or something.
x 4 
