Careercow Keith Olbermann - A-logging commentator and writer with a massive hate-boner for Trump.

thismanlies said:
Personally I wouldn’t mind if someone from the government showed up on my front door step with a rifle and said “Take this you fuck.”
Click to expand...

I would support a government buyback of surplus military equipment from the Military to the Tax payers (who bought it in the first place)

I want a Jet.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Local Fed
Does Kieth have any family? I mean, if this guy were my uncle or something, and I saw his Twitter feed or his YouTube videos I would send police officers over to his place for a wellness check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlaireWhitesBottom2 and Hex Cat
Hollywood Hitler said:
Does Kieth have any family? I mean, if this guy were my uncle or something, and I saw his Twitter feed or his YouTube videos I would send police officers over to his place for a wellness check.
Click to expand...
No that’s probably the best part is that he is single. By the way did anyone see his tweet replying to his reaction to salty cracker during the J6 hearing.
 
Trump posted this on Truth Social the other day:
1670290347810.png

In response, Keith wants himself to be blackbagged and carted off to Gitmo for advocating the terminating of the Constitution:
1670290284618.png
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Spiraling Rainbow, Markass the Worst and Candlelight Desolation
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: JohnMc, Cpl. Long Dong Silver, Dude Snakes and 3 others
Gwydion said:
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
Click to expand...
Trump announced he's running for 2024 almost a month ago man. Keith is still a reee'ing re though.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Cpl. Long Dong Silver, The Taco Santo!, Markass the Worst and 1 other person
Burd Turglar said:
Trump announced he's running for 2024 almost a month ago man. Keith is still a reee'ing re though.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected. My point still stands, though, and actually being a candidate gives him very strong speech protections. It's purest fantasy to think that he would face arrest for what he said, and not even rational to advocate he be hauled off to a stockade to face military tribunal. The military has no competence or authority to try speech cases involving civilians, and not even the most political military officers would want the case or agree to serve on that tribunal as judge, or jury. A few might be willing to serve as prosecutor, but not many. All of Trump's constitutional rights would still be in effect, and for a defense all he needs to do is point to the preamble to the Constitution. If the Framers could advocate for revolution in the nation's founding documents, he certainly can.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
Gwydion said:
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
Click to expand...
People with TDS are going to exaggerate everything he says until the day he dies and the next Turbo Hitler comes along. They did the same thing with Nixon way back when; look at all of these old episodes from shows where they take potshots at Nixon, and they're doing the same thing with Trump now.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: BlaireWhitesBottom2, The Taco Santo!, Spiraling Rainbow and 2 others
Gwydion said:
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
Click to expand...
You'd think people who scream THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT A SUICIDE PACT whenever it stands in their way would get a little less hysterical when someone else suggests ignoring it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sexy Peach Emoji, The Taco Santo!, Maverick Vile and 1 other person
Gwydion said:
I stand corrected. My point still stands, though, and actually being a candidate gives him very strong speech protections. It's purest fantasy to think that he would face arrest for what he said, and not even rational to advocate he be hauled off to a stockade to face military tribunal. The military has no competence or authority to try speech cases involving civilians, and not even the most political military officers would want the case or agree to serve on that tribunal as judge, or jury. A few might be willing to serve as prosecutor, but not many. All of Trump's constitutional rights would still be in effect, and for a defense all he needs to do is point to the preamble to the Constitution. If the Framers could advocate for revolution in the nation's founding documents, he certainly can.
Click to expand...
I mean if Trump were to be jailed for a lot of the shit he's done (which he should) then Hillary and Biden would be publicly hung (which they should).
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnMc, Slur Slurries and Sexy Peach Emoji
Abyssal Bulwark said:
People with TDS are going to exaggerate everything he says until the day he dies and the next Turbo Hitler comes along. They did the same thing with Nixon way back when; look at all of these old episodes from shows where they take potshots at Nixon, and they're doing the same thing with Trump now.
Click to expand...

The statement in question is pretty grammatically ambiguous, unless there's more to it than the posted picture. It could both be saying that a fake election could result in anarchy or should result in anarchy.

I'd ask if anyone sought clarification, but God knows people like Keith are too busy throwing a tantrum on Twitter.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AirdropShitposts and Candlelight Desolation
AirdropShitposts said:
You'd think people who scream THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT A SUICIDE PACT whenever it stands in their way would get a little less hysterical when someone else suggests ignoring it.
Click to expand...
Don't make me tap the sign:
"The specific political distinction to which political actions and motives can be reduced is that between friend and enemy."

Most of these Lefty faggots would drone "My body, my choice!" like brain-damaged macaws until they got their marching orders that if you didn't inject an experimental vaccine you were "killing grandma!" and deserved to die in a gutter with not a penny to your name. None of this shit is ever argued in good faith, especially among the click-bait political punditry class.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: BlaireWhitesBottom2, RumblyTumbly, SargonF00t and 2 others
Gwydion said:
I stand corrected. My point still stands, though, and actually being a candidate gives him very strong speech protections. It's purest fantasy to think that he would face arrest for what he said, and not even rational to advocate he be hauled off to a stockade to face military tribunal. The military has no competence or authority to try speech cases involving civilians, and not even the most political military officers would want the case or agree to serve on that tribunal as judge, or jury. A few might be willing to serve as prosecutor, but not many. All of Trump's constitutional rights would still be in effect, and for a defense all he needs to do is point to the preamble to the Constitution. If the Framers could advocate for revolution in the nation's founding documents, he certainly can.
Click to expand...
These are the same idiots who don't understand how difficult it is to be charged with inciting violence. I guarantee none of them have ever even heard of Brandenburg v. Ohio

Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Maverick Vile said:
Don't make me tap the sign:
"The specific political distinction to which political actions and motives can be reduced is that between friend and enemy."

Most of these Lefty faggots would drone "My body, my choice!" like brain-damaged macaws until they got their marching orders that if you didn't inject an experimental vaccine you were "killing grandma!" and deserved to die in a gutter with not a penny to your name. None of this shit is ever argued in good faith, especially among the click-bait political punditry class.
Click to expand...

It's a completely true but good luck ever using it in a debate with someone considering who said it.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: RumblyTumbly, Maverick Vile and Markass the Worst
Starscreams Cape said:
Every time I see Keith Olbermann's thread go to the top I'm hoping some brave New Yorker has recreated this event while that fruit is walking his dog in Central Park.

View attachment 4010241
Click to expand...
Turns out the guy about to die here was a Communist that that killed people, it's a gut wrenching picture but he deserved this.
 
  • Like
  • Late
  • Feels
Reactions: ChampFantana, BlaireWhitesBottom2, JohnMc and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back