Dramacow Kevin Allred - Professor of Beyoncé Studies (no, seriously), arrested for threats to kill Trump voters.

I want a diversity of viewpoints.... but NO BIBLE!!!!!

no.png

You're a teacher?! If so, I'm glad that some students went though his class with their brain intact.
And "peer review" in humanities? Don't make me laugh!

Still, most of the kids who took his course are dumb:
gr.png


"No platforming for Mormons!!!"
moron.png
 
I want a diversity of viewpoints.... but NO BIBLE!!!!!

no-png.503455

You're a teacher?! If so, I'm glad that some students went though his class with their brain intact.
And "peer review" in humanities? Don't make me laugh!

Still, most of the kids who took his course are dumb:
gr-png.503458
Wait, so Kevin's teaching again? I feel like I've missed something. Has he said where he's teaching? Also, assuming he's not just blowing smoke out of his ass, I'm 100% certain that Kevin said something actually racist against white people and he's just downplaying it.
 
Mah trannieeeeeeeeees!!!!

View attachment 487840
Just climb over barbed wires like proud and totally non-illegal brown people do, you chickenshit.

Wait, so whatever liberal, open minded utopian country Kev wants to escape to requires people to have citizenship or visa to stay? Just like Trump's fascist xenophobic ameriKKKa?
I'd love to see Kev actually migrate to UK, just to realise that a lot of people there also don't like borderline insane poofters, then get all butthurt, go on a tweeting spree, and find himslef jailed over posting "hate speech" and/or threats to govt employees.
 
Kevvie writes about being excommunicated from the Mormons. Spoiler alert: he literally asked for, nay, demanded it.

...the bishop ultimately turned to me with apoplectic flourish and defensively offered: “It’s like the Mormon church is a tennis club, and you’re asking us to build a golf course just for you. Do you see how unfair you’re being?”
I'd buy the bishop a drink -- if he drank.
Had Kevvie took his advice to heart, he would not have been hauled off to the psych ward and ended up with a thread on Kiwi Farms.

111.png

You'd definitely be happier in Scientology Kevvie; I heard David Miscarriage loves buttsex.

ww.png

I'd rather not having a moral compass at all, than having one of a violent, low IQ baboon.

ccc.png

Implying you're not a blindly consumerist zombie already.

11.png

I'm sorry that white people's inventions like flushing toilets, motor cars, television, computers, universities etc are making your life insufferable.

"The media bolstered Trump the fuck up"? Which timeline are you living in?
t.png
 
No one said "hired".

Hell, no one said "school".
 
ww-png.507089

I'd rather not having a moral compass at all, than having one of a violent, low IQ baboon.
Imagine looking up to an extremely corrupt career politician that only still has a career because a lot of poor black people vote based purely on skin color and whether or not the name has a D next to it on the ballot.
11-png.507076

I'm sorry that white people's inventions like flushing toilets, motor cars, television, computers, universities etc are making your life insufferable.
If I genuinely believed that we were all going to die under Trump like Kevin seems to, I wouldn't be posting shit like that that would guarantee me a spot in front of the firing line when the secret police take over. Either Kevin has no self-preservation instinct (highly likely since his impulsiveness got him fired from Rutgers) or he doesn't believe the bullshit he's selling. Also, that post-modern "everything is performative" thing is why people hate the social sciences now; put that in your pipe and smoke it.
 
Last edited:
I guess I missed a step somewhere, he's sperging about Mormons- what did they do to Beyonce?
 
1111.png

The only valid analysis of that Beyond-shite video is that niggers who have money are exceptionally tasteless.

He has a "virtual classroom" where he bilks spastics at $5 a pop or whatever to watch him sperg about Beyondshite.

He also tours campuses, Guillaume Labelle style:
111111.png

Reminder: if you invite this spaz in your town and he punches a "nazi", you may be held responsible.

Edit:
1.png

You'll be remembered for a batshit consumerist whore that threatened to run people over because of how they voted.

otr.png


Edit: Kevvie got a love letter from -- Albert Einstein!
a.png


1.jpg 2.jpg 3.jpg

There are 50-ish people on your paid forum?!
1111.png

No matter how you call it, it is not a "class". It is at best a fanclub. And fanclub members aren't supposed to read your tirades or follow your orders.

alex.png

So Alex Jones isn't white?

Edit 2: Kevvie wrote a new piece of clickbait about you-know-what. To avoid giving the site traffic I repost it here:

NBC News said:
Beyoncé's September Vogue cover exemplifies how the star is redefining privacy in the modern era

Celebrities and wannabe celebrities alike trade in the currency of real-time confessions. Only Beyoncé remains completely in control of her own narrative.

by Kevin Allred / Aug.08.2018 / 4:29 PM ET

The unveiling of Beyoncé’s Vogue September Issue takeover predictably sent the internet into overdrive on Monday. The Beyhive, her fanbase, is as enthusiastic as it is loyal. Vogue's historic reveal also comes amidst her and husband Jay-Z’s "On The Run II" tour, currently filling stadiums across the U.S.

But while Beyoncé is as publicly visible as she’s ever been, her personal life remains, well, personal. In 2018, celebrities, quasi-celebrities and wannabe celebrities alike trade in the currency of real-time confessions and attention. And yet, Beyoncé has found a way to play by her own rules. She and her Parkwood team, the entertainment company she founded in 2010, can keep a professional secret like no one else — remember her surprise 2013 album “BEYONCÉ”? — but this is more than an innovative marketing strategy. Rather, it is all part of the legendary celebrity’s redefinition of privacy and publicity in the modern era.

In 2015, the last time Beyoncé covered the prestigious September Issue, she refused to grant an interview. It was the ultimate power move, although not without controversy. This time around, she opened herself up more, offering her thoughts on body image, representation, her own ancestry and the emergency C-section birth of her twins. The photos spoke volumes too, as Beyoncé handpicked the photographer: 23-year-old Tyler Mitchell. Mitchell is the first black photographer to shoot a Vogue cover in the magazine’s 126-year history.

Still, the Vogue piece doesn’t give as much access as pop culture often demands, especially since interviews with the star are so rare; she has only given four print interviews in the last five years. This means that Beyoncé has managed to remain both guarded and completely in control of her own narrative, blurring public and private while somehow never giving us enough of either.

She may be trying to keep us wanting more as PR strategy, making herself scarce while still “caus[ing] all this conversation,” as she says in "Formation." Such scarcity is undoubtably a good way to sell albums, tour tickets — and magazines. But it feels more like a subversion of public expectations — what scholar Daphne Brooks called a unique blend of “hyper-visibility and inaccessibility simultaneously.” Beyoncé curates the small pieces of her life she wants us to see — and that’s it. What she does share comes when she’s ready, and never as its happening.

To view Beyoncé's boundaries as a strictly business decision does her a disservice, however. The delineation is political, meticulous and predates the 2013 surprise “digital drop.” Earlier that year, Beyoncé retreated from the press and public life after the release of her documentary “Life Is But A Dream,” a candid visual autobiography of an artist mid-career that itself offered little unknown personal information while still allowing viewers to feel like they’d been given a more extended glimpse behind the curtain.

Some called it heavy-handed, but for Beyoncé, it was a clear declaration of a survival strategy. This was a woman balancing her career as a black woman in an industry (and world) run largely by white men with motherhood and a romantic partnership that has not always been perfect.

Tabloid speculation notwithstanding, the world’s most powerful entertainment couple do not comment on their private lives publicly — only through their art. Despite the soul-baring personal aspects of Beyoncé’s “Lemonade” in 2016, Jay-Z’s subsequent “4:44” in 2017, the Carters’ “Everything Is Love” in 2018 and some additional vague insinuation, actual details about the reality of their lives remain thin. We still don’t know all that we don’t know — and the couple’s confessions often feel like they are as much about politics and universal themes as actual life events.

Beyoncé’s current tour is another example of this perennial balancing act. While the concerts feature husband and wife singing a selection of emotional anthems, it is also a masterclass in translating the personal into politics. Though the musical themes involve marriage, broken promises and healing, the core metaphors can be superimposed onto any of the numerous fractures exposed in Trump’s America today.

Indeed, the show opens with an LED screen proclaiming: “This Is Real Life.” But it’s not, really. Beyoncé and Jay-Z are as much themselves as they are actors, inhabiting the Bonnie and Clyde-esque outlaw characters they’ve been developing since “’03 Bonnie and Clyde,” featured on Jay-Z’s “The Blueprint 2.” The Carters do share personal video of Blue Ivy, Sir and Rumi as part of OTR II but the majority of the tour’s visuals exist as part of a larger cinematic story played out on the streets and beaches of Jamaica. Social commentary on racial inequality and feminism also take center stage at various points in the show.

The personal aspects of OTR II mirror the journey detailed on “Lemonade,” from intuition to redemption. But those steps are also political instructions that don’t rely solely on Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s personal story, or what we think we know of it. So while OTR II might portray Beyoncé at her most publicly vulnerable, she’s still personally in control every step of the way. Even Jay defers to her direction at various points on stage, just as the editors at Vogue did.

This distinct ability — and perhaps intentional sleight of hand — allows Beyoncé the best of both worlds as a powerful public artist and storyteller and private person simultaneously. Maintaining strict boundaries may sometimes be frustrating for fans who grew up alongside the rise of reality TV and 24-7 celebrity access. But it’s also a powerful reminder that Beyoncé doesn’t owe us anything. We should be thankful instead for the art she creates — art that we can use to guide our own lives, instead of trying to consume all the private details of hers.

Kevin Allred is a writer, speaker and educator. He created the "Politicizing Beyoncé" course in 2010. His book "Ain't I A Diva?: Beyoncé and the Power of Pop Culture Pedagogy" is forthcoming from the Feminist Press at CUNY in June 2019.
Once again: Beyond-shite refuses to grant interview because she is literally a retarded dindu who can't string words together without the help of a horde of PR people. It has nothing to do with privacy, nor is it a "power move" or anything.

Must. Protect. Overlady. At. All. Costs.
99.png

The Daily Beast article casts doubt that the Beyond-shite piece on Vogue being an "interview"; Beyond-shite (or, more likely, her handlers) dictated what the author should write. (Even Kevvie concedes, in his thinkpiece, that the Vogue piece "doesn’t give as much access as pop culture often demands" ) No journalist would thought of doing the same to Trump, or for that matter, any number of celebrities.

Daily Beast said:
Now that the piece is published, we learn that Beyonce’s words were “as told to” a journalist.

It is not clear if that journalist interviewed Beyoncé in a free-flowing conventional sense—there are no words other than Beyoncé’s conveyed on the page.

There is no sense of questions being asked and answered.

There are no challenges or questions made of the interviewee.

We simply read the words and thoughts of Beyoncé, and we read them in light of the apparent absolute control the magazine has given to Beyoncé.

In 2015, the last time she was on the cover of Vogue, there was no accompanying interview—Beyoncé rarely grants them.

“As last time, and the time before, there was a lot of discussion about the best way to approach this,” Wintour told BoF on Monday. “Who is better to write about Beyoncé than Beyoncé?”

Really? Does the same go for Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Tom Cruise, Kate Winslet, Angelina Jolie, Paul Ryan, Bill de Blasio, Jennifer Aniston? Surely, a journalist asking questions of someone will produce a more rounded portrait of that person than if we simply leave people to mass-distribute their own musings about themselves? A good interview combines both intimacy and distance, an open mind, and a critical eye.
There is nothing "racist" or "misogynoristic" (ha ha what a word!) about what the author says. On the contrary, he is questioning the undue privilege of some people.

Oh, I'd love to see Kevvie defend the honor of his slave-blood dame.

Kevvie goes metaphysical -- about pop culture:
complexity.png


Yup you're a perfect person to talk about "nuances and complexities":
rapture.png


Kevvie joins the screeching chorus against Twitter:
8.png


ban.png


Untitled.png

You don't have a PhD.

555.png

The only abortion anyone else should pay for was your mom's.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't have a PhD.

It says something about the abysmal standards in current academia that this guy ever held any kind of position as an educator.

He's as retarded as potato Phil. He thinks if you can't actually get something, getting a shitty tattoo of it is just as good.
 
11111.png

Pop music has nothing to do with feminism, except as cheap, transparent pandering.

kkk.png

Why are you still salty? The cunt showed her boob on purpose.

Everyone who isn't me is a fake who does "performative bullshit brand building"!!!!!!!
4344.png


He's still salty that a "student" contradicted him on his forum:
4344.png

Isn't that a bit unbecoming for a "professor" to get so worked up over the ignorant comment from ONE student? Grow the fuck up already.

The "student" probably thought even $5 a month was too much for this bullshit.
 
Back