- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
So where's everyone watching the festivities? I watching on Racket's stream because I'm a dummy and need things explained to me from time to time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Got my ass whooped by a 5'4 mexican guy in jiu jitsu, don't get me wrong I was talking a lot of shit. But there is something about little guys that treat every fight like life and death. The Joe Pesci archetype is real.
pbs stream. is nick's commentary good?So where's everyone watching the festivities? I watching on Racket's stream because I'm a dummy and need things explained to me from time to time.
Yeah, they had HD FLIR drone footage that showed how Kyle and Baldy were walking. Kyle was walking in the same general direction, but pros said he was "chasing" Baldy.Just turned in to Rackets. What's this about missing footage? The FBI deleted footage that contradicted the prosecution's case?
Nick is always good, but he has two other lawyers on with him today, it's really nice.pbs stream. is nick's commentary good?
The drone footage is from the FBI. It is incredibly low quality and edited. The fed agent that testified said they deleted the original footage and we're supposed to believe them.Just turned in to Rackets. What's this about missing footage? The FBI deleted footage that contradicted the prosecution's case?
Same, and I appreciate that they'll point out angles I wasn't personally seeing.So where's everyone watching the festivities? I watching on Racket's stream because I'm a dummy and need things explained to me from time to time.
CourtTV because I am a boomer at heart.So where's everyone watching the festivities? I watching on Racket's stream because I'm a dummy and need things explained to me from time to time.
What was their reasoning for even deleting the footage? Just happens to be a convenient oopsie?The drone footage is from the FBI. It is incredibly low quality and edited. The fed agent that testified said they deleted the original footage and we're supposed to believe them.
I'm 99.99999% sure that the FBI has shit in place to specifically prevent them from deleting anything.What was their reasoning for even deleting the footage? Just happens to be a convenient oopsie?
As far as I've seen there's been zero reasoning given. I believe the judge is holding off on having it introduced unless the full footage can be given to the defense. As it stands now I don't think prosecution can even mention it because it's inadmissible. There's some talk of mistrial but I don't know the possibility of that unless prosecution pushes for it's introduction.What was their reasoning for even deleting the footage? Just happens to be a convenient oopsie?
Yeah, they're absolutely lying.I'm 99.99999% sure that the FBI has shit in place to specifically prevent them from deleting anything.
You know these megacorps are only so well entrenched because they can lobby the government to get what they want right? Just looks at Eminent Domain laws. I can get the government to tear down your house so I can build a new Walmart or bank.>all that shit under 'free market security'
Do lolberts actually believe this shit with every other megacorp out there putting their employees through CRT training?