Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Got my ass whooped by a 5'4 mexican guy in jiu jitsu, don't get me wrong I was talking a lot of shit. But there is something about little guys that treat every fight like life and death. The Joe Pesci archetype is real.

Those short dudes can be fucking dense, and that lower center of gravity is a bitch to deal with. We had a 5'4 guy on my squad back in school and he was like a fucking rock golem when he dug his feet in, you could not move him. Plus they're usually at the perfect height to jab you right in the kidneys, fuck that.
 
It's annoying being late to this thread in real time, but at least I can put the trial on 1.5x speed and skip through the breaks :smug:

Especially bypass this nigger
Screen Shot 2021-11-03 at 10.07.08 AM.png

Although, I do like his suit. It's better than the sweatshirts and t-shirts some of the prosecution's witnesses showed up in at the Chauvin trial. I bet the prosecution bought it for him.
 
Just turned in to Rackets. What's this about missing footage? The FBI deleted footage that contradicted the prosecution's case?
 
Just turned in to Rackets. What's this about missing footage? The FBI deleted footage that contradicted the prosecution's case?
Yeah, they had HD FLIR drone footage that showed how Kyle and Baldy were walking. Kyle was walking in the same general direction, but pros said he was "chasing" Baldy.

It's withholding exculpatory evidence. One of those guys says they need to move to dismiss.
 
Just turned in to Rackets. What's this about missing footage? The FBI deleted footage that contradicted the prosecution's case?
The drone footage is from the FBI. It is incredibly low quality and edited. The fed agent that testified said they deleted the original footage and we're supposed to believe them.
 
What was their reasoning for even deleting the footage? Just happens to be a convenient oopsie?
As far as I've seen there's been zero reasoning given. I believe the judge is holding off on having it introduced unless the full footage can be given to the defense. As it stands now I don't think prosecution can even mention it because it's inadmissible. There's some talk of mistrial but I don't know the possibility of that unless prosecution pushes for it's introduction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meat Target
>all that shit under 'free market security'
Do lolberts actually believe this shit with every other megacorp out there putting their employees through CRT training?
You know these megacorps are only so well entrenched because they can lobby the government to get what they want right? Just looks at Eminent Domain laws. I can get the government to tear down your house so I can build a new Walmart or bank.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back