Leftist Dictatorship Apologists / Third-World Fetishists / Shithole Tourism / Tankies, Wumao, and Vatniks - Western democracy is DEAD!

[Samuel Fuller]

Thumbnail it next time.



There's also the fact that normal people don't splurge on stupid shit as often as self-proclaimed leftists/socialists do. There are things you can do to limit your consumption under capitalism even if socialists are correct in that we are forced to participate in capitalism in order to survive.

For example, stop spending money on Apple products, it blows my mind at how leftists seem to love Apple products more than most other people, considering how their products are overpriced and underpowered (building cheaper PCs, or finding cheaper laptops, than equivalent mac computers is practically a meme), AND how Apple works harder than any other company to lock you into their ecosystem against your will. Just get a Windows computer, or if you REALLY hate Microsoft/Google, there are more and more normie friendly flavors of Linux you can use, and distributions of Android with all the Google shit stripped out.

Learn to cook and buy cheaper, healthier groceries, stop spending money on deceptively expensive goyslop and fast food.

Me personally? I got by just fine with a cheap shitty android phone for half a decade.

Even if socialists don't spend money on stupid/overpriced shit more often than normal people do, it's certainly more noteworthy when they do, because they should be above that.

You don't know shit about computers. LOL

 

[winderson_silva]

Because it's not like you can live with the Amish, right?

Or just not spend as much. Like these people will see Hassan on a mansion and be like "do you think he should be homeless?" when you say he could live on a smaller house and donate the majority of his gains. Remember, these people also shit on Mr Beast because "his philantrophy is to earn money for his channel" as if all philantrophic organizations dont do it, since they need money to funciton.

This guy on the India thread kinda explained the best the whole third worldism.

Unfortunately this taint aint limited to leftists. A whole lot of edgetard right wingers have been coming out the closet in recent years to vomit out simpering praise of third world shithole cultures and societies for being "trad" and "virile" and "rugged" and "based" due to how fucking shit life is in these parts which equates to some inherent rugged masculinity and the general unga bunga durka durka hate for jews/women/homogays/the west.

Basically its the same old "noble savage" autism, with the retard left whacking off over the "noble" side where all third worlders are magical and peaceful yet powerful and spiritually and culturally rich saints and martyrs, and the retard right whacking off over the "savage" side where all third worlders are badass and ultra pious and ruggedly wise traditionalist ubermensch who reject all globohomo poisons and degeneracy and will inevitably triumph over the decadent and weak and feminised west by virtue of brute strength and might makes right ethos.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

This guy on the India thread kinda explained the best the whole third worldism.

Honestly, whenever anyone points out that third worlders reject things like transgenderism, homosexuality, etc, that's not a compliment to the third worlders. If anything, it should be framed as, "We should be fucking embarrassed that not even the third worlders are dumb enough to fall for these things."

 

[Do Not Touch Me Pls]

"We should be fucking embarrassed that not even the third worlders are dumb enough to fall for these things."

Third Worlders are wack in their own way but they have fortified values that cannot be compromised easily. The "First Worlders" already relinquished everything for degeneracy masquerading as "morals" and whoever's advocating transgenderism or homosexuality as a virtue didn't even need to force them in hard.

 

[NarkDigger]

Honestly, whenever anyone points out that third worlders reject things like transgenderism, homosexuality, etc, that's not a compliment to the third worlders. If anything, it should be framed as, "We should be fucking embarrassed that not even the third worlders are dumb enough to fall for these things."

I don't think that's entirely true.
The third world has a lot of problems with sexual stuff, homosexual rape, bestiality, prostitution, aids, and even among countries with the most troons are places like Brazil or Iran.

It's just that they reject the "western" framework of thinking about it with its rainbow pride, "lifestyle", "same sex marriage is the same as normal marriage" etc.

 

[SoleniyKraut]

It's just that they reject the "western" framework of thinking about it with its rainbow pride, "lifestyle", "same sex marriage is the same as normal marriage" etc.

I live in such a country, I can tell what I've observed:

It depends on the context. You see, if a man and a man marry (Which I am against of myself), they might find it repulsive - BUT, if sodomy occurs when one man tries to humiliate the other and show his dominance, then it's a kind of "necessary" evil. I already mentioned in one thread how I've Central Asian teens say that you're only gay if you take it in the arse, and not dish it out. In prisons there can be men who are used as sexual relief for the more "respected" convicts. This comes from the USSR era, the prison stuff - otherwise I think muslims are just sercretly super gay.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

Gotta love the horseshoe theory, amirite?

I also found it slightly baffling that they put Mao in there as well. As much as leftists screech about "fascism," and as much as we can appreciate the irony that there's a fair amount of overlap between fascism and far left ideologies, there comes a point where you gotta realize that something doesn't have to be "fascist" to be fucking terrible.

Or that inside most "anarchists" is a tyrant screaming to get out. Anarchists don't hate the police or the state so much as they envy them.

As confusing as the meme was, it was honest. Sorta. I mean, before the meme got posted here, we were talking about how infamous commie tyrants like Mao were either anarchists in their youth, or fans of writings by anarchist philosophers. Perfect timing, really.

Another thing I should mention is the multitude of infamous commie dictators who have read works by anarchist philosophers, up to and including Stirner? It speaks volumes. It says that either these people tried to implement their ideas and still wound up with an authoritarian shithole, or that they liked their ideas but found the "anarchist" bits wanting.

Should be a good way to shut up any idiot who claims that "real communism" never has been tried, or that things would have been better had they implemented the more libertarian flavors of socialism instead.

 

[LaxerBRO]

Also curiously there're bunch of double-defectors who attempt to defect back to NK because SK is burgerified capitalist niggerhell.

Those are mainly middle aged to older person that fled but since they grew up in some farming town and developed no skills.

Drop them in a hyper competitive and degree focused South and they get cast aside not useful for anything other than manual day labor work or basic jobs (bagging groceries). Hell, even a janitor may be too complicated for them as they lack common knowledge...spraying surface cleaner on computer screens or not throwing away items at a workplace due to a scarcity mindset.

He may have been eating grass with his long time "neighbor" but at least they had that connection. In the South, it's go go go and his yearning for friendship withers.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

He may have been eating grass with his long time "neighbor" but at least they had that connection. In the South, it's go go go and his yearning for friendship withers.

South Korea is somehow worse than North Korea. At least North Korea has fun parades. Seriously, North Korea is just as much as the dictatorship in South Korea.

 

[LaxerBRO]

At least North Korea has fun parades.

I don't think commoners get to go to parades. Having an emaciated in threadbare clothes tends to ruin the image.

 

[Thiletonomics]

I don't think commoners get to go to parades. Having an emaciated in threadbare clothes tends to ruin the image.

The commoners are probably still forced to watch them, probably via TV broadcasts of them.

 

[Skylavijas]

Honestly, whenever anyone points out that third worlders reject things like transgenderism, homosexuality, etc, that's not a compliment to the third worlders. If anything, it should be framed as, "We should be fucking embarrassed that not even the third worlders are dumb enough to fall for these things."

I live in such a country, I can tell what I've observed:

It depends on the context. You see, if a man and a man marry (Which I am against of myself), they might find it repulsive - BUT, if sodomy occurs when one man tries to humiliate the other and show his dominance, then it's a kind of "necessary" evil. I already mentioned in one thread how I've Central Asian teens say that you're only gay if you take it in the arse, and not dish it out. In prisons there can be men who are used as sexual relief for the more "respected" convicts. This comes from the USSR era, the prison stuff - otherwise I think muslims are just sercretly super gay.

Came back late to add to this, but from my experience of interacting with foreigners while travelling across Europe, the general vibe I get is that most of them don't really care about the LGBT stuff all that much. Sure, they may find it weird and icky, maybe even call people fags, but none of them vandalize LGBT flags or throw stones at balcony windows that have the rainbow flag proudly displayed. Contrary to the internet, this mindset of queerness being an abominable evil that needs to be vanquished is not shared by most people. They may disapprove of their family members partaking in it, but it's more so in the same manner families express disapproval of somebody dressing like a punk or goth. If it's stranger on the street, it's whatever, at most you may just roll your eyes, but that's it, only babushkas can find the time out of their day to lecture strangers on the street about their lifestyle or fashion. I think the idea that 3rd worlders are inherently anti-LGBT is largely a myth.

By contrast... I see any sort of Israeli or Russian flags and symbols being vandalized and desecrated all the time, no matter where I go. You genuinely put yourself in danger by dawning such symbolism publicly, as you have no idea which arab/slavic diaspora person you could cause to chimp out and tempt them to punch you in the face. In some Western European cities you are unironically safer walking around in a fursuit than proudly displaying the star of david on your chest... 3rd worlders operate on a different set of priorities I'd say.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

Sure, they may find it weird and icky, maybe even call people fags, but none of them vandalize LGBT flags or throw stones at balcony windows that have the rainbow flag proudly displayed. Contrary to the internet, this mindset of queerness being an abominable evil that needs to be vanquished is not shared by most people. They may disapprove of their family members partaking in it, but it's more so in the same manner families express disapproval of somebody dressing like a punk or goth. If it's stranger on the street, it's whatever, at most you may just roll your eyes, but that's it, only babushkas can find the time out of their day to lecture strangers on the street about their lifestyle or fashion. I think the idea that 3rd worlders are inherently anti-LGBT is largely a myth.

Tis true, though from the perspective of the LGBTQ, if you simply find them icky, they think you're anti-LGBTQ even if you don't go out of your way to persecute them.

Yes, yes, I know,

 

[Granny's Peach Tea]

For all the gushing about North Korea, I’m surprised we haven’t seen any Jim Jones apologists. We already know their mindset is as long as you say “America bad” and call yourself a socialist sometimes, your actions are excusable even if you murder almost 1000 Americans in one day.

There has to be some tankies who genuinely believe his drugged-up tangents about the CIA and FBI trying to kill him because he was super socialist.

 

[NarkDigger]

I’m surprised we haven’t seen any Jim Jones apologists. We already know their mindset is as long as you say “America bad” and call yourself a socialist sometimes, your actions are excusable even if you murder almost 1000 Americans in one day.

There has to be some tankies who genuinely believe his drugged-up tangents about the CIA and FBI trying to kill him because he was super socialist.

Even before the suicide there were people who escaped from there and tried to warn everyone that (just like in any communist country) everyone is starving because food is only for the ruling , everyone is being beaten, abused or raped etc.
At the time there were many popular leftist jumping to Jones's defense claiming that it's actually just evil right-wingers attacking him because he ended racism and successfully achieved equality.

As for modern Jones apologist I think I've never seen them but when someone makes one of those "omg scary thing that happened" kind of video essays they never actually mention ideology except for some vagues sense of fighting for equality or they try to frame it in a way that america back then was super racist and evil there for what Jones did is one of those things that started with very noble intentions but then got a little derailed.

Obviously going deeper into ideology would require you to acknowledge that communism is evil and that his whole pastor shtick was basically reddit level understanding of "Jesus was a socialist hippie who wanted people to be nice" which is just incorrect and dumb.
Which both of those things are not something that those people would like to admit.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

Even before the suicide there were people who escaped from there and tried to warn everyone that (just like in any communist country) everyone is starving because food is only for the ruling , everyone is being beaten, abused or raped etc.
At the time there were many popular leftist jumping to Jones's defense claiming that it's actually just evil right-wingers attacking him because he ended racism and successfully achieved equality.

As for modern Jones apologist I think I've never seen them but when someone makes one of those "omg scary thing that happened" kind of video essays they never actually mention ideology except for some vagues sense of fighting for equality or they try to frame it in a way that america back then was super racist and evil there for what Jones did is one of those things that started with very noble intentions but then got a little derailed.

Obviously going deeper into ideology would require you to acknowledge that communism is evil and that his whole pastor shtick was basically reddit level understanding of "Jesus was a socialist hippie who wanted people to be nice" which is just incorrect and dumb.
Which both of those things are not something that those people would like to admit.

I believe you, sources are nice tho.

This sort of thing makes me super dooper autistic about making another Lolcows of History thread, specifically Jim Jones.

 

[harbringer883]

For all the gushing about North Korea, I’m surprised we haven’t seen any Jim Jones apologists. We already know their mindset is as long as you say “America bad” and call yourself a socialist sometimes, your actions are excusable even if you murder almost 1000 Americans in one day.

There has to be some tankies who genuinely believe his drugged-up tangents about the CIA and FBI trying to kill him because he was super socialist.

Reddit absolutely defends him lol. Funnily enough I always imagined that "reddit island" would end up exactly like Jonestown.

 

[A Very Big Fish]

Jesus was a socialist hippie

Well that can't be right, the Bible clearly shows that Jesus was capable of feeding people.

Even before the suicide there were people who escaped from there and tried to warn everyone that (just like in any communist country) everyone is starving because food is only for the ruling , everyone is being beaten, abused or raped etc.
At the time there were many popular leftist jumping to Jones's defense claiming that it's actually just evil right-wingers attacking him because he ended racism and successfully achieved equality.

As for modern Jones apologist I think I've never seen them but when someone makes one of those "omg scary thing that happened" kind of video essays they never actually mention ideology except for some vagues sense of fighting for equality or they try to frame it in a way that america back then was super racist and evil there for what Jones did is one of those things that started with very noble intentions but then got a little derailed.

Obviously going deeper into ideology would require you to acknowledge that communism is evil and that his whole pastor shtick was basically reddit level understanding of "Jesus was a socialist hippie who wanted people to be nice" which is just incorrect and dumb.
Which both of those things are not something that those people would like to admit.

Jim Jones did reach out to those who were left behind by society, but you know who else does that? Every mega church scum fuck that is dedicating their ministry to fleecing the poor. People who are vulnerable are the perfect target for people like Jones. Not to mention, he killed all of the people he was "helping".

It would be like saying Marshall Applewhite was supporting Women in STEM. If you have a very strained definition of all those words, and ignore the whole death part of the death cult, its technically true.

 

[NarkDigger]

he killed all of the people he was "helping".

This reminds me, he even called it a "revolutionary suicide" and told them that the US government will come and brutally murder them anyway because they hate them for doing communism and anti-racism.
One might even say that they killed themselves to own the chuds.

 

[Ultraman Orb Dark]

Well that can't be right, the Bible clearly shows that Jesus was capable of feeding people.

He also had magic powers.