Leftist Dictatorship Apologists / Third-World Fetishists / Shithole Tourism / Tankies, Wumao, and Vatniks - Western democracy is DEAD!

The belief systems of a lot of political ideologues and other nutcases become easier to understand once you take a look at their personal lives. What the vast majority of them have in common, no matter where on the political spectrum they are, is that their own house, their own life, is in disarray in some form or another, and they lack the courage to face it and find a way to fix it, so they direct that energy outwards instead.

Marx and Engels weren't merely hypocrites, their personal lives were an absolute mess.
Are you sure you’re not talking about a guy with small law practice in Minnesota who’s a libertarian?
 
Nestor Makhno is probably the only (anarcho)communist I’ve sort of liked. He seems okay.
Mao, in his youth, was an anarcho communist. He was a huge fan of Peter Kropotkin's works, and read them profusely. His retarded ideas, like the peoples' communes, can be traced back to that. It's a running meme that Maoists are just basically anarcho-retards with a red paint. Especially with how adventurous and violent they can be. Groups like Shining Path and the Red Guards in the US are some examples of this.
 
Marx and Engels only became communists because they were literally dumb college kids engrossed by Owenite non-sense and propaganda. Marx, at one point, was so enamored by it he wanted to join an Owenite, Christian commune in Texas. He applied for immigration status to Texas in 1850, but it never got processed. Like, a lot of people don't understand communism very well because they just don't even bother reading about the lives of these people or how they got to where they were at in life. It becomes a lot easier to understand if you can trace the genealogy of these people.
Damn your American immigration system. You would have solved so many problems by just letting Marx die as a dumb, retarded weirdo Christian in Texas.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dropa5pack
Black woman moves from America to Russia to escape racial discrimination - gets beaten up by her racist neighbors, barred from entering her own apartment, while the police do nothing.


This is far from an isolated incident, many foreign students express similar, if not worse events. In case anybody here has forgotten... This is what real racism looks like. Racist organizations in the west like the KKK are an utter joke compared to the ones in Russia. There are groups of people that had filmed themselves decapitating foreigners and distributing videos online as a way to gather more members, while the justice system is unable to punish the perpetrators for decades. It's not about posting wojaks on twitter to them. And I can assure you... Their lord and savior - Taoré, will not come to save them.
 
Because it's not like you can live with the Amish, right?
1000005785.webp
 
Because it's not like you can live with the Amish, right?
View attachment 7700568

Thumbnail it next time.

The amish would like a word.

There's also the fact that normal people don't splurge on stupid shit as often as self-proclaimed leftists/socialists do. There are things you can do to limit your consumption under capitalism even if socialists are correct in that we are forced to participate in capitalism in order to survive.

For example, stop spending money on Apple products, it blows my mind at how leftists seem to love Apple products more than most other people, considering how their products are overpriced and underpowered (building cheaper PCs, or finding cheaper laptops, than equivalent mac computers is practically a meme), AND how Apple works harder than any other company to lock you into their ecosystem against your will. Just get a Windows computer, or if you REALLY hate Microsoft/Google, there are more and more normie friendly flavors of Linux you can use, and distributions of Android with all the Google shit stripped out.

Learn to cook and buy cheaper, healthier groceries, stop spending money on deceptively expensive goyslop and fast food.

Me personally? I got by just fine with a cheap shitty android phone for half a decade.

Even if socialists don't spend money on stupid/overpriced shit more often than normal people do, it's certainly more noteworthy when they do, because they should be above that.
 
Black woman moves from America to Russia to escape racial discrimination - gets beaten up by her racist neighbors, barred from entering her own apartment, while the police do nothing.


This is far from an isolated incident, many foreign students express similar, if not worse events. In case anybody here has forgotten... This is what real racism looks like. Racist organizations in the west like the KKK are an utter joke compared to the ones in Russia. There are groups of people that had filmed themselves decapitating foreigners and distributing videos online as a way to gather more members, while the justice system is unable to punish the perpetrators for decades. It's not about posting wojaks on twitter to them. And I can assure you... Their lord and savior - Taoré, will not come to save them.
Nigress makes a mess in corridors of apartment complex. Do that for a long enough time to make her neighbors... Very angry (to put it mildly), probably, had a chimpout on a woman, which she didn't show in the video, got hit in the face by husband, and made crying video on the Internet. Big fucking woop
Also, moscowtimes... You will have more truth on the onion rather than on that rag
 
Thumbnail it next time.



There's also the fact that normal people don't splurge on stupid shit as often as self-proclaimed leftists/socialists do. There are things you can do to limit your consumption under capitalism even if socialists are correct in that we are forced to participate in capitalism in order to survive.

For example, stop spending money on Apple products, it blows my mind at how leftists seem to love Apple products more than most other people, considering how their products are overpriced and underpowered (building cheaper PCs, or finding cheaper laptops, than equivalent mac computers is practically a meme), AND how Apple works harder than any other company to lock you into their ecosystem against your will. Just get a Windows computer, or if you REALLY hate Microsoft/Google, there are more and more normie friendly flavors of Linux you can use, and distributions of Android with all the Google shit stripped out.

Learn to cook and buy cheaper, healthier groceries, stop spending money on deceptively expensive goyslop and fast food.

Me personally? I got by just fine with a cheap shitty android phone for half a decade.

Even if socialists don't spend money on stupid/overpriced shit more often than normal people do, it's certainly more noteworthy when they do, because they should be above that.
Its hilarious that all the so called socialists are always massive consoomers.
Where did they get the hundreds of thousands number from? Also I love how that means they support russia lmfao.
 
Last edited:
Using Max Stirner as representative of fascism has got to be a joke. Otherwise OPs IQ would have to be so low they'd pass away from forgetting how to breathe. I've seen mollusks displaying higher level of wisdom.
 
Using Max Stirner as representative of fascism has got to be a joke. Otherwise OPs IQ would have to be so low they'd pass away from forgetting how to breathe. I've seen mollusks displaying higher level of wisdom.

The only thing that Stirner has in common with Mussolini is that Mussolini was reported to have read Stirner's works and actually enjoyed them.

Stirner's philosophy was essentially narcissism mixed with nihilism, basically rejection of anything that gets in the way of what your ego wants and desires. He's a popular symbol for edgelords on the left (and more rarely the right, but mostly by self-proclaimed right wing libertarians). Few people have actually read his work, and his drivel is useless to the average person anyway.

And he went on to inspire many on the left, many of whom nevertheless hold onto some VERY spooky ideas, ironically enough. Though the left's relationship with Stirner's ideas is kind of a love/hate sort of deal.
 
Last edited:
The only thing that Stirner has in common with Mussolini is that Mussolini was reported to have read Stirner's works and actually enjoyed them.

Stirner's philosophy was essentially narcissism mixed with nihilism, basically rejection of anything that gets in the way of what your ego wants and desires. He's a popular symbol for edgelords on the left (and more rarely the right, but mostly by self-proclaimed right wing libertarians). Few people have actually read his work, and his drivel is useless to the average person anyway.

And he went on to inspire many on the left, many of whom nevertheless hold onto some VERY spooky ideas, ironically enough. Though the left's relationship with Stirner's ideas is kind of a love/hate sort of deal.
Stirner is a pirate at heart that had the misfortune of being born in north Germany and attending Hegel's philosophy lectures on German idealism. A lot of his philosophy boils down to "Yee booty is mine, and if thy scallywags have issue with it, come and plunder it from me!". He doesn't even try arguing that the invincible hand of the market would magically sort everything out, again, remember, morality is a spook. Everything should be run based of mutual self-interest, which is not too far off to how actual pirate republics operated. Anybody that says Stirner is a fascist either never fucking read the book "the ego and its own" or are thoroughly braindead.
 
Anybody that says Stirner is a fascist either never fucking read the book "the ego and its own" or are thoroughly braindead.

Among the other people and movements that Stirner influenced include Emma Goldman (anarcha-feminist), Émile Armand (free love, no rules governing sexual conduct), and the illegalist movement (embracing criminality as a lifestyle or philosophy).

The only appeal that Stirner would have to these right wingers is that Stirner rejected many utopian ideas associated with anarcho-socialism, or the idea that people would stop trying to dominate each other in the absence of a state. Or the implication in Stirner's ideas that might makes right. Stirner rejected the idea of equality as a "spook," the left wing is usually defined as being really into ideas like "equality."

Other than that, that there would be any sort of connection between Stirner and right wing authoritarianism is indeed mind-blowing, as there are plenty of ideas associated with Stirner that would also disgust most rightists.

In searching for connections between Stirner and Mussolini, I came up with these:

 
Last edited:
The common valuing of militancy for militancy’s sake, on violence as an immediatist or irrationalist means without ends, was conjoined at the same time with an apocalyptic hunger for a revolution to shatter the establishment and existing order, no matter who it took to get it going. All of the figures Whitaker covers were influenced by this combination. It is also, sadly, rather timeless. National Bolsheviks and eco-fascists today continue to leverage the same sort of argument, “I’ll ally with anyone serious about smashing The Bad System and steeled for action, everything else is a distraction.” Whether capitalism or civilization is held as the ur-enemy that we must narrowly focus on defeating at any cost, fascist creep goes into overdrive. And the same sort of somewhat paradoxical conjunction of irrationalist immediatism with revolutionary instrumentalism. We see the same with folks urging collaboration with boogaloos while griping that “antifascism is just liberalism because it shies away from absolute violence; at least these reactionaries are happy to shed blood here and now.” The cult of militancy and rupture remains eternally attractive to a certain set.

If the only problem, the only thing holding us back from a revolution, is timidity and unwillingness to act, to spill blood, then even the most reactionary scumbag is more sympathetic and has more potential than the mewling handwringing of some – no doubt liberal – comrade wondering if we really need to stomp this row of infants to death to prove our militancy. And woe betide the sort of sniveling coward who asks questions like “okay but what exactly is the causal relationship between these means and the ends we’re seeking?”

Ok, this makes slightly more sense. But that still makes the meme bewildering, as it expresses a clear preference for "non-racist" fascists and the paper you shared states numerous times that anarchists sympathetic to Mussolini were thoroughly despised within their own circles.
 
Last edited:
Ok, this makes slightly more sense. But that still makes the meme bewildering, as it expresses a clear preference for "non-racist" fascists and the paper you shared states numerous times that anarchists sympathetic to Mussolini were thoroughly despised within their own circles.

Gotta love the horseshoe theory, amirite?

I also found it slightly baffling that they put Mao in there as well. As much as leftists screech about "fascism," and as much as we can appreciate the irony that there's a fair amount of overlap between fascism and far left ideologies, there comes a point where you gotta realize that something doesn't have to be "fascist" to be fucking terrible.

Or that inside most "anarchists" is a tyrant screaming to get out. Anarchists don't hate the police or the state so much as they envy them.

As confusing as the meme was, it was honest. Sorta. I mean, before the meme got posted here, we were talking about how infamous commie tyrants like Mao were either anarchists in their youth, or fans of writings by anarchist philosophers. Perfect timing, really.
 
Last edited:
Back