Lego Thread - Because KF wasn't already autistic enough.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Lego Pokemon is happening next year,
1742312589994.png
Whyyyyy? I know this will sell like hotcakes, but that's the scary part -- it's an original theme opportunity getting eaten up by a license. I hope Dreamzzz isn't dying for this; it's just starting to get really, really good (but then, cyberworld waves are always good). I might get this if they have some interesting buildings.
 
Whyyyyy? I know this will sell like hotcakes, but that's the scary part -- it's an original theme opportunity getting eaten up by a license. I hope Dreamzzz isn't dying for this; it's just starting to get really, really good (but then, cyberworld waves are always good). I might get this if they have some interesting buildings.
Dreamzzz looks like their usual 18-24 month unique theme slot, although it's gone a bit long already. Monster Fighter, Chima, Hidden Side, Nexo Knights, there have been a regular churn for those slots, about every 2 years, like clockwork. Sometimes there is a gap that gets swapped for an IP (where there are gaps, or weird launches like Vidiyo), but an OG theme follows.

The initial Ninjago launch may even have been one, as it looked like might have only lasted 2 years. (Just reading the product lines- They dropped out of nowhere a "Ninjago will be back" and a preview of the cyborg/robot, but there was almost a year without new sets, less than 20 released in 2013-2014.)
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AnsemSoD1
So i guess this means pokemon mega is dead, right?
MEGA as a whole is going to be phased out in 2025 to be replaced by something called Mattel Brick Shop (more information on it comes in May). Allegedly there's going to be Barbie and MOTU Lego sets in 2026 as well. I'm not sure how Barbie and Friends will coexist, but the MOTU sets will be based on the new movie. I think that Mattel is going to outsource all the licenses Lego deems acceptable (Hot Wheels, Barbie, MOTU, Pokemon) and keep Mattel Brick Shop for violent video game sets Lego would never associate themselves with.
 
1743228125257.png
 

Attachments

  • 1743228143359.png
    1743228143359.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 8
soyance.webp

A LEGO set celebrating science soyence came out and I knew there would be some premium content.

Behold the 3 greatest people for the advancement of human civilization:

1. Newton: Physics, calculus, and most of the rest of science.

2. Pierre & Marie Curie: Radiation & chemistry.

3. Black guy...picking cotton? ...and eating peanuts? (Shout out to George Carver, inventor of 300 peanut recipes/cotton farmer)

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE
 
View attachment 7228752

A LEGO set celebrating science soyence came out and I knew there would be some premium content.

Behold the 3 greatest people for the advancement of human civilization:

1. Newton: Physics, calculus, and most of the rest of science.

2. Pierre & Marie Curie: Radiation & chemistry.

3. Black guy...picking cotton? ...and eating peanuts? (Shout out to George Carver, inventor of 300 peanut recipes/cotton farmer)

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE
There's gotta be some coding in there to imply Newton as gay.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: AnsemSoD1 and NSA
View attachment 7228752

A LEGO set celebrating science soyence came out and I knew there would be some premium content.

Behold the 3 greatest people for the advancement of human civilization:

1. Newton: Physics, calculus, and most of the rest of science.

2. Pierre & Marie Curie: Radiation & chemistry.

3. Black guy...picking cotton? ...and eating peanuts? (Shout out to George Carver, inventor of 300 peanut recipes/cotton farmer)

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE
that looks nothing like the desktop PC the Curies worked with
this is bullshit
 
Whyyyyy? I know this will sell like hotcakes, but that's the scary part -- it's an original theme opportunity getting eaten up by a license. I hope Dreamzzz isn't dying for this; it's just starting to get really, really good (but then, cyberworld waves are always good). I might get this if they have some interesting buildings.
Anyone who's been a Lego fan for a longer while knows that in the early 2000s the company was saved by Star Wars, Lego's first huge licensing deal. Lego stretched themselves too thin in the '90s with lots of themes and experimental products that were expensive due to Lego's autistic R&D. Meanwhile the '90s kids stopped playing with plastic bricks and turned to video games. Lego stayed in business thanks to Star Wars branded sets and games which sold like hot cakes at premium prices, boosted by the second movie trilogy. That's why Lego pounced on Harry Potter to coincide with its first movie's release, and the rest is history.

The explosion of licensed sets in the last 5-10 years is just Lego using a proven formula, tapping on to adults fondly remembering their '90s childhood, as well as the next generation (e.g. Minecraft). These themes just wouldn't sell as well as they do if they weren't attached to a major IP. And I'm glad they do it because it means they can also justify producing some less commercially viable sets for manchildren putting Lego models on shelves and manchildren of the builder/AFOL variety.

Now, if you care about Lego, the actual issue you should be paying attention to (aside from globohomo themes) is the decreasing quality of bricks in the last several years, but that's a topic for another time...
 
Now, if you care about Lego, the actual issue you should be paying attention to (aside from globohomo themes) is the decreasing quality of bricks in the last several years, but that's a topic for another time...
What's this about? The only cracked parts I have are older. Does this have to do with their shift towards renewable materials for bricks? When I first heard of that I was afraid that this meant new bricks turn to dust in 10 years or so. Personally I'm glad they're coming out with new parts I've always wanted; let's just hope we get a 1x2 plate with studs on both sides and studded slopes some time.
This is the ugliest Lego set in history. Hideous.
If this was a MOC it would have been totally studless. It should have been built with sideways bricks rather than plate stacking. These display type sets are better suited for MOCs anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whatevermancer
What's this about? The only cracked parts I have are older. Does this have to do with their shift towards renewable materials for bricks? When I first heard of that I was afraid that this meant new bricks turn to dust in 10 years or so. Personally I'm glad they're coming out with new parts I've always wanted; let's just hope we get a 1x2 plate with studs on both sides and studded slopes some time.
Lego's quality control and manufacturing standards have gone down a lot in the last 5 years or so. Newer bricks often have these marks on the sides. If you search for "Lego mold marks" you won't be able to unsee it, and you'll find plenty AFOLS complaining about it.

kwbbi0y44ba1.webp

This is where the plastic was injected into the metal mold when the bricks were made. If you go back 10-15 years, these marks were much less visible, usually on top of a stud or hidden on the bottom of a tile. For some reason (likely cost of manufacture) Lego moved the injection points to the sides of some elements. Nasty mold marks were always a sign of knockoff brands, but these days Lego is cutting corners while the knockoffs are constantly improving their quality. The company made $2B net profit in 2024, you'd think they could sustain the quality they had in the '90s...

Cracking is a separate problem altogether. Various shades of brown (reddish brown, dark brown), as well as dark red and dark orange bricks manufactured from about 2010 to 2017 are prone to breaking because Lego used a faulty brown dye that messed with the ABS plastic that they use. This made the bricks very brittle. They fixed the issue in 2018. Aside from that, older bricks might crack on their own from use. They typically shouldn't if you handle them carefully and don't put too much stress on them. If you want to be extra autistic about it, don't put Lego in direct sunlight because UV makes bricks go brittle over time (aside from making white/gray bricks turn yellow which everybody knows about).

I'm not sure the new "renewable" plastic happened fully yet. It was supposed to be a long transition process in which they ditch oil for resin in the plastic mixture. Reportedly the green elastic elements (plants, etc.) are already made from a new kind of polyethylene. It's hard to say how much of it just Lego's cost savings, and how much is an obsession with renewables typical for big corporations. I don't buy new sets often so I haven't noticed a difference yet, other than molding quality.
 
This is the ugliest Lego set in history. Hideous.

View attachment 7271113

WTF is wrong with these designers? BTW, the original artist died of AIDS, just saying.
I'll take stuff like this over "brand logo" sets.75407_Prod_en-gb.webp
I feel like this is peak slop. The zenith of laziness and pandering to manchildren that'll honk like baboons when they see Thing They Recognize.
 
This is the ugliest Lego set in history. Hideous.

View attachment 7271113

WTF is wrong with these designers? BTW, the original artist died of AIDS, just saying.
I remember these goofy little stickman paintings, neat to see them again after so long translated pretty accurately into lego form. Not gonna be able to afford the asking price though lmao.

Anyone who's been a Lego fan for a longer while knows that in the early 2000s the company was saved by Star Wars, Lego's first huge licensing deal. Lego stretched themselves too thin in the '90s with lots of themes and experimental products that were expensive due to Lego's autistic R&D.
Kinda revisionist, star wars wasn't the only thing that saved lego, there were also several extremely successful themes that came out around the same timespan of lego star wars, and lego star wars actually came out during 1999, one year before 2000. Personally I'd say 2001 was a turning point year for lego to go on the up and up to some degree. I still have a lot of these either partly assembled or intact somewhere in some box or bin probably, oddly not many figures from this time crack I've noticed. You don't start seeign that shit happen frequently till like the mid-late 2000s era into the whole of the 2010s. Lime was the first color to have that shit happen to it, and brown and the other colors soon followed suit.

1745529629598.webp1745529660415.webp1745529782112.webp1745530202376.webp

Personally a big thing I miss are like the 4 or 5 dollar sets they used to put out that were just minifigures and maybe some simplistic diorama piece or a trading card. They'd never dot his now thanks to the "influencer culture" and "value speculation"(fancy scalping) around minifigs but god I miss that shit.
1745529955822.webp1745530007169.webp
the rock raiders figure set pic is from a scalper listing because that's all that show up now for those. I don't know why such an easy to find minifig in the last several years became scalped and "SUPER RARE!!!". Defeats the entire purpose of why he was sold separately as his own guy (ease of purchase/not needing an expensive set to have the leader think I already rambled about that though)
 
Last edited:
Lego's quality control and manufacturing standards have gone down a lot in the last 5 years or so. Newer bricks often have these marks on the sides. If you search for "Lego mold marks" you won't be able to unsee it, and you'll find plenty AFOLS complaining about it.
I've noticed that myself. That's not really a concern for me as long as the bricks stay together.
I'll take stuff like this over "brand logo" sets.75407_Prod_en-gb.webp
I feel like this is peak slop. The zenith of laziness and pandering to manchildren that'll honk like baboons when they see Thing They Recognize.
The stickman set is respectable. I even tolerate the flowers since it gives us lots of parts in strange colours that would have only been possible to get as prototypes. The worst are the "geek displayables"; it's an excuse not to work in action features when they could have had both high detail and action features. What would have been a Marvel or Star Wars playset a few years ago is now a piece of land with some minifigures thrown on and maybe a small building or vehicle.
Personally a big thing I miss are like the 4 or 5 dollar sets they used to put out that were just minifigures and maybe some simplistic diorama piece or a trading card. They'd never dot his now thanks to the "influencer culture" and "value speculation"(fancy scalping) around minifigs but god I miss that shit.
The battle packs and Microfighters are basically those. Battle packs are ludicrously expensive; it's $25 for 4 minifigures and a piece of rock nowadays -- why get that when you could get the Dreamzzz jet which has a great build and better minifigures? And because they have QR codes for the blind packs, the regular minifigures series are another equivalent to that.
 
Back