- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
Lolcow Leonard F. Shaner Jr. - Autistic Pedophile / Foamer / Shitlord
- Thread starter Zim
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2014
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2015
Good job, Len. You've uncovered that one of us is a reporter for a fake news site. Gonna use that site to file complaint about Samus Aran's behavior to the Federation now?
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
Kirby specifically stated that he wasn't at the hearing, and that the stiry was related to him by another railfan.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2015
Done. Sorry 'bout that.
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
Wait I thought he was Dennis
Edit: dox removed
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
Possibly a railfan, the one who was at the trial.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2014
Everyone quoting BOLDYSPICY's comment with the dox name in it needs to quit it.
@TM Ambrose , @Cthulhu .
C'mon guys, we know the drill by now.
Tryin' real hard not to sound like your momma right now @BOLDYSPICY! , but you keep editing your comment without removing the dox.
@TM Ambrose , @Cthulhu .
C'mon guys, we know the drill by now.
Tryin' real hard not to sound like your momma right now @BOLDYSPICY! , but you keep editing your comment without removing the dox.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
I fixed it, sorry! Like I said, I just thought it was a name Len made up. Sorry @TM Ambrose & @Jashinist . Sorry, everyone.Tryin' real hard not to sound like your momma right now @BOLDYSPICY! , but you keep editing your comment without removing the dox.
EDIT: Besides, the only way you could sound like my mom is by chastising me about not going to law school. Ha!
Heh. . .
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
Thank you. I honestly didn't notice. It's fixed.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
More proof that Len is illiterate. See that little " symbol, Len? That's called a quotation mark, and is used to indicate that you are repeating what someone else has said. In this case, Kirby was passing along an account provided by Privet Detective Pinkington Pufferton.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2015
Len being a jackass who can't spell or use grammar? I'm SHOCKED!
Frank Rizzo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2014
You'd think after several dozen of his "Gotcha!" attempts have backfired into his face, that Len would wise up and stop attempting them...
.....You'd think....
.....You'd think....
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2015
I'd say it's a mixture of autism and a massive ego
That's why he never changes
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2015
Late by several pages, but, to whoever it was that asked about the train-wrecking statutes and capital punishment, it is indeed on the law books in PA, as a capital offense, but the last person to be convicted and executed for it here was way back in the 1920's/30's (He broke the tracks to derail a passenger train hoping to rob the mail car/injured passengers in the confusion, instead, he derailed a freight and killed the locomotive's fireman.)
Why does it warrant execution? Again, speculation was correct.
Train accidents are messy, carry a potentially high death toll, and due to the hazardous cargo sometimes carried, a great chance of causing a cascading series of disasters, or, as the law words it "risking catastrophe". But it's mostly because the law was written in a time when the railroads were the primary (and in some cases only) form of intercity and interstate commerce and travel, even as recently as right before WW2, your average person didn't always own a car and if they did, there were no such things as highways or affordable coast-to-coast air travel. Most people still took the train, so tampering with the rails was not only a risk to personal life and limb, but a risk to the economy and society in general. It would be analogous to the similarly tough modern federal laws against carjacking and air piracy. Engaging in them is seen as an attack on the country's ability to conduct free trade and the citizen's right to free travel. (And why horse theft was a capital offense in the 19th Century, it was more than running off with your property, it was destroying your livelihood)
Now, since the railroad's scope and place in society has changed greatly since then, the odds of someone breaking that law are less, but it still remains on the books because in practice, laws tend to fall out of disuse and be forgotten about but not removed, as others have noted.
It's very unlikely Len would have been charged under it though, even if he had been successful in derailing a train with fatalities. There's more than enough current law that covers his actions without having to resort to an ages-old statute that would call for a penalty the Commonwealth of PA hasn't used since the late 1990's. In fact, being charged under a law that's laid unused like that for nearly 80 years is grounds for an appeal under the 5th Amendment's "Cruel and Unusual" punishment clause, if there's more modern/common ways to classify the same crime. (To use horse theft again, NOBODY is going to get the chair for stealing a horse these days, even if some western state still has it on the books, they'll get charged with regular old theft and that will be that)
Not that Len couldn't be, or that he wouldn't be successful in an appeal, but, it's just overall unlikely, the train wrecking statute is mostly a living fossil of a different time.
Why does it warrant execution? Again, speculation was correct.
Train accidents are messy, carry a potentially high death toll, and due to the hazardous cargo sometimes carried, a great chance of causing a cascading series of disasters, or, as the law words it "risking catastrophe". But it's mostly because the law was written in a time when the railroads were the primary (and in some cases only) form of intercity and interstate commerce and travel, even as recently as right before WW2, your average person didn't always own a car and if they did, there were no such things as highways or affordable coast-to-coast air travel. Most people still took the train, so tampering with the rails was not only a risk to personal life and limb, but a risk to the economy and society in general. It would be analogous to the similarly tough modern federal laws against carjacking and air piracy. Engaging in them is seen as an attack on the country's ability to conduct free trade and the citizen's right to free travel. (And why horse theft was a capital offense in the 19th Century, it was more than running off with your property, it was destroying your livelihood)
Now, since the railroad's scope and place in society has changed greatly since then, the odds of someone breaking that law are less, but it still remains on the books because in practice, laws tend to fall out of disuse and be forgotten about but not removed, as others have noted.
It's very unlikely Len would have been charged under it though, even if he had been successful in derailing a train with fatalities. There's more than enough current law that covers his actions without having to resort to an ages-old statute that would call for a penalty the Commonwealth of PA hasn't used since the late 1990's. In fact, being charged under a law that's laid unused like that for nearly 80 years is grounds for an appeal under the 5th Amendment's "Cruel and Unusual" punishment clause, if there's more modern/common ways to classify the same crime. (To use horse theft again, NOBODY is going to get the chair for stealing a horse these days, even if some western state still has it on the books, they'll get charged with regular old theft and that will be that)
Not that Len couldn't be, or that he wouldn't be successful in an appeal, but, it's just overall unlikely, the train wrecking statute is mostly a living fossil of a different time.
Frank Rizzo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2014
I know it's a broken record to compare Shaner to OPL but.....
Remember during OPL's own doxing saga? How smug OPL was in all of those videos? "I just exposed who da ta-rolls are! I win!"
Just age Chris 10 years, and here ya go...
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
So Hy is here. Kaufman is here. Lenny and his socks are here. Can you faggots give us a buzz word or something to tell socks from real life faggots? We can give you a pretty blue banner if you do.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2015
Still catching up but something super autistic popped into my mind.
Maybe late...
Hi A log=Hy-Len=Hi Len
I feel like Pufferton after a hit of LSD.
Maybe late...
Hi A log=Hy-Len=Hi Len
I feel like Pufferton after a hit of LSD.
- Joined
- May 17, 2015
Nah, the chase is half of the fun. As long as the farms don't sperg out on the way that is. Besides, their whole battle plan is to intimidate and silence us with various more or less likely treats. I don't think a lawyer is stupid enough to even come close to claiming to be from the FBI, better to let Len carry the (diaper)load.
Personally i've taken quite a fancy to old Hy. I wouldn't mind having a few beers and burgers with him while he tells me war stories. Say what you want about him defending Len but that whole Agent Orange and forklift thingy is honorable work even if he got payed.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
Because the person attending the trial told Hy he (or she?) worked for The Onion when Hy asked why they were there. Its in the account of the trial.
- Status