- Joined
- Jan 30, 2025
I don't think it's supposed to be taken too seriously. Like they don't necessarily a NEED need, like "I can't get off without it" sort of thing like they say. The way I see it, it's more like their main reason for being there.That sounds sexually debilitating. Like you physically cannot get off without, I dunno, wearing a gimp mask? I feel like if your performance is that dependant on fetish play as opposed to just being with someone you love and find attractive, you're probably severely over exposed to sex, pornography, or both. I guess that's sort of out of the scope of the thread but I have never heard of that before and it sounds awful.
Nope! But, the nature of gay promiscuity makes it relevant.Are either philosophies really necessary when you know and are close to someone for a while?
That's actually why some people prefer RACK over SSC. The main criticism of SSC is how unnatural and stiff it can be, depending on the person. I think we can all agree the anankastic & autistic are the worst offenders of this. They're not drowning in ass lol. If you have common sense and have known the person for long enough, of course you won't need either. ...Unless you're trying something new....Obviously if that's what makes someone feel safe, go for it, but I never understood needing a damn itinerary and rulebook when I'm doing something kinky with someone I've been with and known for years.
Last edited:


