The "Make people care to watch it again" is really the thing that kills me, because he's both actually right, and really fucking wrong. Stuff like the junkyard computers stuff they did? That shits evergreen, and makes sense to record as top tier as you can because if you remaster it in a decade, it'll probably get views again - its an entertainment product in which the tech is just an accessory, ancillary to everything else. If 90's star trek had actually been filmed in 12k widescreen and could just be 'exported' to modern resolutions, you bet people would be interested in those again. But do the same for 90's CNET Video, and nobody would give two fucks. Nobody is actively watching review and recommendation media for visual fidelity or content, and its rapidly useless as time moves on and its performance metrics become irrelevant. Whatever the 'normal' production standard for the day is, that's good enough.
All he really needs is one crazy top recording device, and accept that "yea those productions are just a bit laggy to work on" but they're not your crunch schedule weekly episode anyway, so its fine. Everything else is probably fine on 2k video, the extra's nice for editing, and 2k won't make a $1500 workstation struggle.