Druveer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2018
It's like a "I LOVE SCIENCE" post from facebook by people who don't know the first thing about science.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's like a "I LOVE SCIENCE" post from facebook by people who don't know the first thing about science.
No he's entirely wrong. Steve Played a quote that even in full context did not change Steve's Criticism whatsoever. Oh and with the Billet Labs thing he did give Linus the chance to reply and published his reply in the video. This latest video was not (contrary to the Canadian Cuck's view of it) about Linus. It was about a lawsuit. The criticism of Linus was criticism of his reaction, using a video of him saying something retarded that was even completely in context no different than the shorter clip played by Steve. Also everything he talked about in regards to ethics, including right to reply, vary and are different from media outlet to media outlet. Ethics in Journalism is constantly being debated, and are constantly shifting. Right to Reply simply doesn't even apply in this case as Steve wasn't reporting on anything, he was giving his opinion on Linus's attitude. Right to Reply by the way is just that, the ability to reply to an accusation (note not a criticism). what did Steve accuse him of? Nothing, he disagreed with how Linus handled it. There is literally nothing to reply to. The very few vids that Steve did on Linus did not only give him the right to reply but presented those replies in the videos. Right to reply doesn't mean the person has to agree with your reply and instantly decide not to publish the story.he's not entirely wrong about Steve not giving him a right to reply
TL;DR
No, he's entirely wrong.
Nigga, Steve said there's this controversial clip from a bigger channel we feel we should address, here it is. He wasn't going out of his way to make a video on LTT, he was reacting to shit that people said. If you think you need to have a sit down chat with people before you talk about their public statements, you are retarded.I still disagree with the right to reply but whatever. My point was more that all of this Honey stuff was overblown and that complaining that someone from another country doesn't want to join your CAL that will pay pennies in the end is faggotry
Steve wasn't asking for Linus to join his lawlsuit. He was just pointing out that Linus knew this info and kept it to himself, which was a point that was made in the original MegaLag video in much more detail. He then played Linus' ridiculous "everyone would hate on me more if I told them" argument (which is untrue, as the MegaLag expose was seen as overall positive by pretty much everyone). That's the entire extent of Linus in an entire hour of the video. Maybe two minutes at best, and it was all just Steve thinking it's a bit of a dick move (which it kinda was).I still disagree with the right to reply but whatever. My point was more that all of this Honey stuff was overblown and that complaining that someone from another country doesn't want to join your CAL that will pay pennies in the end is faggotry
Consumerism is pure unimpeded capitalism.How does that view have anything to do with capitalism?
Did they actually decline to comment? I don't believe that was in the MegaLag video, did LMG make a statement elsewhere?I love how Linus will bitch and moan about having the "right to reply" but when his company is actually given it, like in the MegaLag video, they refuse to comment.
No, and I don't know why he claimed that.Did they actually decline to comment?
Did they actually decline to comment? I don't believe that was in the MegaLag video, did LMG make a statement elsewhere?
They failed to comment regarding the majority of his questions but did speak a small amount of some of it with one reply. He mentions they stopped responding when he pressed them regarding all of the questions they ignored at 16:03. So while they did issue an initial response, it wasn't satisfactory and he was immediately stonewalled after.No, and I don't know why he claimed that.
15:16
Wow no acknowledgement of the traditional caretakers? What a chud.Clipped out the 23 minute segment at the beginning of the WAN show where he's talking about GN
View attachment 6870982
Probably a few more days, Steve's been pretty busy, and they have nothing to gain by rushing out a response - Right now, Linus is the one who looks like a clown, and if they half ass their response, it could backfire on them.When can we expect a response from GN? We are kind of in limbo until then.
I had forgotten that that's much more damning than the GN video.No, and I don't know why he claimed that.
15:16
Well...Probably a few more days, Steve's been pretty busy, and they have nothing to gain by rushing out a response - Right now, Linus is the one who looks like a clown, and if they half ass their response, it could backfire on them.
LMFAO Linus you tried to big dog them and now they are publishing the good stuff. Well done, you played yourself.
GN just posted weekly news.Probably a few more days, Steve's been pretty busy, and they have nothing to gain by rushing out a response - Right now, Linus is the one who looks like a clown, and if they half ass their response, it could backfire on them.
Arrived a bit late to the party but here's my 2 cents.
While I agree that Linus is a faggot and that he's ego and narcisism is as high as the Elon Musk one, he's not entirely wrong ... that the honey drama surrounding Linus was exaggerated.
While I think Linus should have told the community about the reason he left Honey on Wan Show, like he did with other sponsors, where he would dedicate a segment of it for it.
The funniest thing is that Linus is such a dumb fuck that he must have seriously thought that someone as fastidious as GN Steve is wouldn't have receipts to back him up.LMFAO Linus you tried to big dog them and now they are publishing the good stuff. Well done, you played yourself.