Litigation Fund

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Jesus dude, go shit on someone's birthday cake.

"Unless my unreasonable, arbitrary standards have been met, no success can be called victory."
I personally don't see how we can call this anything but a total and humiliating Kiwi Farms loss until the CEO of Epik personally sucks Josh's dick to completion and then sets himself on fire and backflips off a 10 story building while screaming "There are only two genders" the whole way down.
 
This is a shit argument. Its illegal to be a tranny in many countries, how about that?
And in other countries, like Iran, it's compulsory.
how long do we think it'll take before that's added to our wikipedia page?

they're usually pretty quick right :)
Yes, I'm sure they'll see that reputable and reliable publications in the domain registration industry have issued neutral reporting noticing the retraction and they will obviously obey their own "Reliable Source" policy and add it immediately because they're such ethical pedophiles over there at Wikipedo.
 
"grow a pair, faggots, you're getting us in trouble"
how long do we think it'll take before that's added to our wikipedia page?

they're usually pretty quick right :)
Still waiting on them to allow the one reasonable admin to add Chris Kindred's involvement in starting Gamergate 2. Any minute now. They gotta fold in the face of overwhelming evidence, right? It's not like 80% of their editors/admins have "transfem" badges on their user pages and are ideological warriors, right?
 
They are crusading for a better and more tolerant world and anyone who stands against that can't be doing it for a logical or altruistic reason. But there's this pesky problem: Reality keeps refusing to conform to their model of how it should be.
But they have it, that’s the thing. For the past five years they have had about as tolerant a world as they could reasonably expect, and they know this. But across Progressive activism, it’s the same response - inventing new enemies and ways of being marginalised. Pronouns are not preferred, whites are born oppressors, the Pink Tax - today apparently the word ‘homosexual’ is a slur. To me its narcissism routed in social media and trophy syndrome combined with a pandering media and a quality of life too comfortable to give people meaning, so there is a need to conjure insurmountable handicaps and impossible enemies to give existence purpose. Hence we get this attitude now of being hypersensitive to the tiniest slip ups, because the act of crusading for the greater good is more meaningful than whatever the greater good might end up looking like.
 
Seriously null with this money your sitting on you should be much more litigious.
The better policy is "don't fire until you see the whites of their eyes."
Corps are people in US law for better or worse. So you can defame companies and they can represent themselves in court. Like with Lolcow LLC. for example.
That's the opposite of reality. Actual humans can defend themselves pro se, as bad an idea as that usually is. Corporations, while legally people, cannot represent themselves and need an actual licensed lawyer to represent them.
Now I'm waiting for Rackets to explain, several weeks from now when it makes its way through the drunken haze, that he wasn't wrong about the Farms having no case.
Past Nick, while fairly basic in his approach, was generally right about his explanations of law to laypeople and stuff like "what's the standard for summary judgment." He has since pickled his brain and gone full retard to the point that he will claim it's totally legally fine to creep around someone's property at night and glue things to it, piss on someone's grave, or in this case, falsely accuse someone of hosting child pornography.

His current "legal opinions" are entirely based on who he's in an alcoholic rage against, and essentially worthless as a result. Even LawTwitter is more reliable than Nick at this point. He is a devious, truculent and unreliable skeletal retarded faggot.
 
Last edited:
Can Null still shake them down for cash for libel? As much as I hate the current court system trend of suing for anything I'd love to see Epik have to give null a cash settlement.
No. Epik has complied with a formal demand for retraction. Any damages sought at this point would be material rather then statutory. Which are not worth pursuing as a Jury could just declare them to be worth 1 dollar. Null has bigger fish to fry
 
No. Epik has complied with a formal demand for retraction. Any damages sought at this point would be material rather then statutory. Which are not worth pursuing as a Jury could just declare them to be worth 1 dollar. Null has bigger fish to fry
also Epik is already broke and in bankruptcy. Not much money to seek there and im pretty sure the main idea behind the litigation was to get a retraction and a "win" and not necessarily money though im sure Josh wouldnt mind getting some cash out out of this for his trouble (and they are many)
 
Remembering what Josh said on Mati about Honeycomb and LFJ, we'd need at LEAST 500k for big corpo lawfare. Hold your enthusiasm, baby steps.
I’ll have to go back and watch it, but Josh didn’t say that they needed at least half a million to sue Honeycomb and Elliot, but that a bigger lawfare company like the one Josh looked at required at least 500K. What he did say was that what lawsuit will be filed will have to be lean. So we’ll likely see a lawsuit on tortious interference but not much else unless Josh suddenly gets a lot more money.

I suspect his focus for now will be on defeating Caraballo who, being an ideological troon, will take this to court no matter what. The easy part is over, which is why we need to do our parts to fund the lawsuits.
Archived tweet.

This article too.
 
Back