Litigation Fund

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
This type of stuff, inserting your crossdressing queer kike shit where it doesn't belong and isn't welcome, is why there is such a thing as "smear the queer". Queers wonder why people don't like them. This is why.

I think its funny that they got back together when she had pyelonephritis and had to go to the hospital. #1 reason for pyelonephritis in college age women is being dicked down too much. This is completely true. The theory is that being smashed so often leads to forcing typical, but foreign skin flora (bacteria) from the participating partner into the urethral opening, and then they just crawl their way up into the kidney. So, if they were broken up at the time, she got pyelonephritis from following the old slut adage "to get over someone, get under a bunch of other people" and was playing community bicycle. Of course, given how weird and retarded this queer kike is, he would enjoy that idea.

I guarantee he married his queer JAP wife to be more acceptable in the legal community since I would imagine law, just like in medicine, they try to be all "progressive and accepting" but it is overall a conservative culture that doesn't honestly welcome such people. Surgery is a good example of this, it's all rainbows and pronouns in the open, but the people that run the show talk very disparagingly about the diversity rainbow squad when they are sure no one is listening.
 
Last edited:
first and foremost, it's counterproductive for anyone who was not directly affected by these actions to contact the bar or this person's employer on the site's behalf. null has an attorney, and this thread is proof that his attorney has the inclination and resources to respond accordingly. have faith in mr. hardin. if you choose not to, don't post about it.

second, there's no evidence that this person is culpable for the actions of the registered agent. it simply wasn't his decision to make; it was theirs. he may have initiated it (and i wouldn't be surprised if he did so by presenting himself as an attorney and by implying that his concerns were litigious in nature), but he made no reference to russia, nor to the site's (alleged) relationship with russia, which was the registered agent's justification for its decision.

third, while it may or may not be advantageous to address grievances with his prior actions, i would be more concerned that he openly states his intention to continue to do this, while also encouraging others to do the same:
1711309704440.png

ianal, but this seems to present far more potential for actionable claims and complaints against this person.
 
Don't be a retard. I want to laugh at this guy, not see him disbarred.
I want to laugh at this guy being disbarred, but let's just say it's probably not going to happen and it might not be a good idea even to try. It's pretty much up to Null, who should be the only one filing one (if on advice of counsel it is a good idea).
I'm amazed this guy went to Texas for law school. I have a funny feeling this was a "I'll go wherever I can get in" situation since I don't think Texas, as a general rule, loves crossdressing queer kikes. Of course, U of Tex Law School is in the pozzed hole of Austin, so I am sure he fit in. I doubt he ever traveled into the "real" parts of Texas.
To paraphrase the late great R. Lee Ermey, nothing comes out of Texas but steers and queers, and this fancy little fucker doesn't look like a longhorn to me.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it was stupid then and it would be stupid now, if anyone would have any leg to stand on to make a complaint would be the owner of the LLC (i.e. nool), not any of us retards.
Honestly the dude straight up admitted to tortious Interference. The unprofessional conduct is just the icing on the cake. For those who don't know, lawyers are not supposed to use their powers unless hired by a client or for their own personal representation in court. It can be a breach of ethics to hold yourself out as an attorney but then not be representing a client.

That said the worst the Bar will do to this faggot a slap on the wrist with a strongly worded warning letter letting him know he has been a very naughty boy and advising him to be mindful of separating his legal practice and his personal public advocacy. But even that is a stretch. More likely they will just throw any complaints in the trash.
 
Kiwi-dûr you mean
A0EAD4FF-F5C4-4182-ADEC-63A164180CEF.png
Behold the All Seeing Eye, aloft in the sky sits the Great Kiwi Tower. None shall escape fate, the unknown becoming known.
To paraphrase the late great R. Lee Ermey, nothing comes out of Texas but steers and queers, and this fancy little fucker doesn't look like a longhorn to me.
Cowboy
 
Why is it always these immensely faggot looking motherfuckers?
Every. Fucking. Time. It's some cucked beta male fag who think's he's hot shit and he'll be the one to take down the "Evil Kee-Wee Farms", no exceptions.

I hope this soylet soon comes to regret his decision by trying to fuck around with the big boys because they're done playing nice.
If you're gonna dish it out, you shoudl've prepared to take it, Henry.

Unrustle their Jimmies.jpg
 
That said the worst the Bar will do to this faggot a slap on the wrist with a strongly worded warning letter letting him know he has been a very naughty boy and advising him to be mindful of separating his legal practice and his personal public advocacy. But even that is a stretch. More likely they will just throw any complaints in the trash.
I would’ve suspected that, at most, this in conjunction with any substantial history of ethics violations might constitute a suspension. I’m not an attorney so what the fuck would I know but that result seems to be very consistent in most professions. Finding a history of malpractice is probably for more experienced people than myself.
 
You are aware bar complaints are sent by the bar to the person you are making it about and they include your real name, yes?
I would have thought the only person who could complain to the bar association in relation to this gentleman's conduct would be Null, given that this literal faggot has admitted to tortuous interference against one of Null's related entities.

A whole bunch of ethics complaints from a bunch of self-doxing autists would not only (a) open said autists up for reprisals and (b) probably put the bar association off from taking these complaints seriously, hurting Null's chances of getting redress.
Yes, it was stupid then and it would be stupid now, if anyone would have any leg to stand on to make a complaint would be the owner of the LLC (i.e. nool), not any of us retards.
Precisely.

I'd be leaving any sort of action against Hank for Null and Hardin to work out among themselves, and leaving well alone.
 
I've seen people on this site manage to dox people from the reflections of buildings off their eyes (Keffals), another got doxed by the release date of a limited run monster drink (Keffals Orbiter I believe) and another guy by a welcome mat on the floor of a fucking Ice Cream Parlor.

And this guy is surprised that Kiwifarms found his online information that's tied to his real name?
anytime I've posted photos here that I've taken I slap that resolution down in MS Paint- because I know someone is autistic enough that they could probably find my social security number in the reflection of a dewdrop
 
Iirc, private tags are only for 2 things:
I. dox of a lolcow on 1st page &
II. nudes of lolcows
This was the case a few years back, not sure if this is still in effect. Spoilers are always fine. You can easily tell the difference by the background, private tags give that fancy background & require an account to view, spoiler tags have no fancy background.
0EEB737A-E5A2-4795-AAEF-4717ADBEC58A.jpeg
Screenshot from the last time private tags became all the rage. There is a backend reason for this as well.
 
Back