Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's always weird that they use Hana Uzaki to protect this shit. The joke is that she's short, so they think she's a child until they see her massive breasts and she talks about alcohol, college, and getting filtered in Metal Gear Rising. She's literally an example of why being a drawing isn't an excuse (you can *gasp* draw adults). I wish DSP didn't claim the phrase "Fucking Mental Midgets" because hot damn is that not apt right now.View attachment 7092629
nigger, liking anime and thinking lolicon is gross/for pedos are not mutally exclusive.
No, it specifically distinguishes "cartoons or animations" from ai generated images. This bill is total lolicon death.so from what ive read its only banning ai generated child porn
What is the point of this law, then if their modus operandi will be just more of the same? What exactly are you enforcing other than just tacking on more charges?there's an existing law against lolicon/shotacon and what they do is they charge you with it when you're busted for other things related to child endangerment.
Wow, the argument really is just this for over 200 pages.It's all so tiring, the cope of "it's just a drawing," "it's a victimless crime" , and my personal favorite cope, "it's an outlet for pedophiles so they don't offend." Niggers, It might be a drawing and lines on a paper, but it's what the lines on the paper or pixels on the monitor represent and the fact that you subhumans jack off to it. That's why people hate you! That's why you're lumped in with pedophiles, you fucking retards. Kill yourselves.
Mexican trannys most affected. Another swamp cleared. You're gonna get sick of winning. #WWG1WGAjust to further drive home how batshit they're being, this is their reaction over ONE STATE passing a law banning this shit. A single state. Out of fifty.
Dude, no. The bombs just make it worse. Send in the IP2 streamers.Two nukes wasn't enough
The chief function of these laws is to allow federal agencies who don't like you to fill your devices with CSAM and then pile on charges. It's never been about protecting kids or actually stopping the people who exploit them.What is the point of this law, then if their modus operandi will be just more of the same? What exactly are you enforcing other than just tacking on more charges?
My curiosity: what will happen in the edge case where someone gets caught with just drawings and nothing else?
This subgenre of pedos who unironically and proudly call themselves lolicons piss me off. Do they think they're better than other pedos?View attachment 7092577
This is my favorite reply.
>Loliplapper
>Our passion
>Lolicons will take on the entire government
>![]()
The intent is to make it a state crime, not just a federal crime. All the better to hammer the loliniggers with.What is the point of this law, then if their modus operandi will be just more of the same? What exactly are you enforcing other than just tacking on more charges?
My curiosity: what will happen in the edge case where someone gets caught with just drawings and nothing else?
What's most obnoxious is that the same people who argue "slippery slope is real" see no issue with giving the government more power over the internet.The chief function of these laws is to allow federal agencies who don't like you to fill your devices with CSAM and then pile on charges. It's never been about protecting kids or actually stopping the people who exploit them.
First amendment supersedes state laws too, as you know. My question still stands on how it will be litigated in court.The intent is to make it a state crime, not just a federal crime. All the better to hammer the loliniggers with.
View attachment 7092629
nigger, liking anime and thinking lolicon is gross/for pedos are not mutally exclusive.
According to Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick:these loliniggers are so annoying holy shit i hope they kill themselves
are they only banning ai generated cp or also lolicon?
Senate Bill 20, by Sen. Pete Flores, creates a new state felony offense for the possession or promotion of obscene visual material that appears to depict a child younger than 18 years old, regardless of whether the depiction is of an actual child, cartoon or animation, or an image created using AI or other computer software.