Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

Btw, Pragmata just came out and i remember some months ago a lot of the usual suspects were going all out with this game because you have to care for a girl that you carry around. I wonder if they are talking about it.
saw some let's player slop videos about it, but haven't had the time to check and see how the unhinged loliniggers are acting.

Anything on the radioactive front that is Twitter?
 
Yup most of them just like to larp as Japanese but if you look deeper the three largest demographics either from LATAM,SEA or Eastern Europe.
"Lolicons" (Japan) and child molesters have basically no overlap—but more than some random pair of types of people, obviously. The interest is rarely entirely innocent, but also that's not who's fucking kids. Crime stat enjoyers know what's up.

But I do always say that Japanese media is bad for people who are dumber than the Japanese (or who are actually insane) because it's too weird. Also true of horror movies or "true crime," songs about killing yourself or being a gangster, etc. Dumb/crazy people think of messages from outside as instructions for life.

A hard problem.
 
Anything on the radioactive front that is Twitter?
I took these screenshots from Facebook. It seems some people feel attacked and offended because others are concerned that a realistic image of a young girl could be used for perverse purposes.
244.jpg
145.jpg
1847.jpg
123803.jpg
 
i think we need to bring back pro american media or make better quality animation that is superior and maybe stop force feeding this slop of
star wars 67855746573, the nig awakens.
Eventually the lolicons will realize" hmmm maybe im a loser and need to find better taste and not look up anime children."
(thats a way to deal with it in america atleast)
 
Last edited:
I took these screenshots from Facebook. It seems some people feel attacked and offended because others are concerned that a realistic image of a young girl could be used for perverse purposes.
View attachment 8868451
View attachment 8868453
View attachment 8868457
View attachment 8868464
While i get that having a child character is endearing and might drive the story of a man willing to protect her, the other aspect is true. Don't forget how people ripped nude models of Ellen Page from Beyond: Two Souls. I wouldn't put it beyond some sick fuck to do this with a cute kid in a videogame.

Also, this should be a bit concerning. Those of us that know, know what it means.

62c4435f89abb3590f6bea09e1b918ea5483ca627c7b8b5c3808d1ad7e158e4a.png
 
While i get that having a child character is endearing and might drive the story of a man willing to protect her, the other aspect is true. Don't forget how people ripped nude models of Ellen Page from Beyond: Two Souls. I wouldn't put it beyond some sick fuck to do this with a cute kid in a videogame.

Also, this should be a bit concerning. Those of us that know, know what it means.

View attachment 8871008
Fuck this, they know their audience. I am this close to wishing the developers were firebombed.
This must be because it is a woman who wrote it, and it has an alphabet agency, therefore... woke?
Can lolitrannies get more retarded?
 
As you all should be aware, Pragmata drops today. Be on the lookout for lolicons talking about it on social media, and remember to archive. The harvest will be bountiful
 
On the recent case with lolicucks with this game called pragmata,

I saw that some of them were trying to play it off as a mere "father-daughter simulator game" as if the developers aren't outrightly and forth using the terms associated with Lolicons (or the "loli community, however abstract that is.)

1776430846013.png

Again, looking at the comments I see that they are using their most common weapon; deflection and projection. By calling anyone who sees the obvious schizophrenic, they can avoid criticism and can rationalise their desire, however irrational and evil it is.- they also do this to make normies (or atleast, retarded, groomable ones) more amicable in the hopes to increase their izzat with the "normal" in another effort to normalise their inherent degeneracy.

1776431461201.png (this is the most popular and outrageous example.)




Looking at the original poster, she has links to rev says desu, and other near "inhuman" categories of people.

While being "le based!", she clearly doesnt have a christpilled viewerbase, and she certainly does endorse it by reposting hilarious fetish art such as this:
1776431355921.png

Don't let people like this fool you.
It was never wholesome, It was never kino and it never will be. This is an outlet for their diseased fetishes and stance against human life.
 
As you all should be aware, Pragmata drops today. Be on the lookout for lolicons talking about it on social media, and remember to archive. The harvest will be bountiful

as if the developers aren't outrightly and forth using the terms associated with Lolicons

They are indeed catering directly to lolis/pedophiles:

1776424247285.png

Tweet | Archive

The responses are as classy as you'd expect:

10551.jpg

Here are some other tweets I found regarding the "censorship" of Diana:

10540.jpg

10547.jpg

Archive
 
And again, we have similar messages bursting out from the lolicon coom-unity with this form of projection

image_2026-04-17_143354941.png
"You are a pedophile for calling my epstein disciple intrests ped-AAAACKK"
source

1776433074327.png
^here is some more from OP
source


some more PR stunts
1776433170565.png

And like I said for this being mainly a PR or a deflection in order to gain the favor of normies. even "normal" people (who are fucking BLIND btw) are repeating this rhetoric and obvious propaganda.
1776433425841.png This is why I urge you not to be fooled. Although I doubt anyone in this thread is this retarded.
>from mentis
mentiswave tweet (he's blind)
 
I saw that some of them were trying to play it off as a mere "father-daughter simulator game" as if the developers aren't outrightly and forth using the terms associated with Lolicons (or the "loli community, however abstract that is.)
Reminds me of a film i saw some time ago that had a kind of initial wholesome premise but ended up being really fucked up.
Film's title is Palm trees and Power Lines.
The premise is a 16 year old girl daughter of a single mother that drags a different man to her bedroom every weekend and has a group of shitty friends meets a 32 year old guy that saves her from getting arrested for dine and dashing. At first things are dodgy but when she opens up he gives her advice on how life is not set no matter how good you prepare, you better chase what you want in life and sometimes you have to bite the bullet for what you think its right. Unfortunately soon after they are having sex and the film culminates on him pimping her to a 50 something guy and leaving soon after. The most horrifying thing is the girl looking for the pimp later and saying that she misses him.
some more PR stunts
1776433170565.png
They moved quickly to the "She's a 314 decacycles old android, you uncultured foid." Same old shit, different thing
 
With the whole Pragamata situation, it truly does expose the no-limits factions of the lolisho, pro-shipper, pro-fiction, and adjacent communities.

They are trying to push the limits of what is considered acceptable. It began with, "It's just drawings of anime characters" to "Well, yeah, drawing may have a realistic art style, but it's still muh fiction!" Then, too, "Ok, yeah, the 3D model of the child character is photorealistic, but it's still fiction and not real!"

Also, it wouldn't surprise me if they will try to normalize child sex dolls or robots eventually. They will probably start with child sex dolls with an anime style to eventually realistic looking child sex dolls or robots. "It's muh plastic! It's not a real child! Somebody being attracted to child sex dolls doesn't make them a pedophile!" will be used to defend this.

They are probably going to normalize AI-generated CSAM at some point too. AI tools can generate eerily realistic-looking children. I hear the lolishos always cope by saying that such tools need to be trained off real-life CSAM. But here is the thing: that is only applicable in some cases. Some AI generative tools do not need to be trained off real-life CSAM in order to produce AI-generated CSAM. There have been cases where mainstream AI tools such as Grok generated content that could be considered AI-generated CSAM content.

Their defenses of "it's fiction" and "it's not real, no child was harmed" can be used to defend a hypothetical AI tool that can generate hyper-realistic porn of AI-generated children. For this context, this tool was not trained on illegal content. AI tools can combine multiple training data in order to produce a result. For example, training data of normal porn of adults and SFW legal content of children could both be used to produce AI-generated CSAM.

Have you seen those AI-generated videos of different animals being combined into one? For example, there is this popular owl-cat hybrid, and it has become a meme called Meowls. The videos of it are eerily realistic looking, despite no such animal existing in real life. And the way this hybrid animal moves feels like how it would move in real life, if it were real. The AI tools combined both training data of a cat and an owl to produce this hybrid animal.
1776435934122.png
Now, that begs the question, if the AI tools can do that, then what can they do in combination with legal training data of real-life children?

The exact same flawed defensive arguments lolishos and adjacent communities use to defend their paraphilia, can be used to defend realistic looking child sex dolls/robots and realistic AI-generated CSAM. And such AI-generated content doesn't need to be trained on real CSAM. Therefore, according to their logic, it's still fictional, and thus child sex dolls/robots and AI-generated CSAM should be accepted and tolerated.

This is where they are heading. This is what the no-limits people eventually want to be normalized. And if you dare think that fictional content should have limits, then they will accuse you of being an "anti" or a "moralfag" for daring to think that there should be limits and appeals to morality about such content.
 
This is where they are heading. This is what the no-limits people eventually want to be normalized. And if you dare think that fictional content should have limits, then they will accuse you of being an "anti" or a "moralfag" for daring to think that there should be limits and appeals to morality about such content.
Thank you for posting this, personally, one argument against the decriminalization of ai-csam that I never see brought up is that it would vastly complicate the jobs of people who investigate and prosecute csam producers/distributors/consumers. At this point, it is pretty clear what is and isn’t ai, but down the line this could not be the case. The efforts from law enforcement against that stuff are already slower than preferable, and allowing ai-generated csam would just make it hopeless. I support free speech fully, but we have to recognize that the only way to stop this problem effectively is to make the world a hostile place for anything that looks like it could be csam.
 
Their defenses of "it's fiction" and "it's not real, no child was harmed" can be used to defend a hypothetical AI tool that can generate hyper-realistic porn of AI-generated children
Tbh it's already being used by some to defend the child sex dolls. They will go "they are ackshually benefitial because that guy is not fucking a real child. Therefore, the child sex doll is protecting real children."

It's a really fucked up train of through. As if it's not proven already that going full degenerate will make you want far worse things
 
On the recent case with lolicucks with this game called pragmata,

I saw that some of them were trying to play it off as a mere "father-daughter simulator game" as if the developers aren't outrightly and forth using the terms associated with Lolicons (or the "loli community, however abstract that is.)

View attachment 8871345

Again, looking at the comments I see that they are using their most common weapon; deflection and projection. By calling anyone who sees the obvious schizophrenic, they can avoid criticism and can rationalise their desire, however irrational and evil it is.- they also do this to make normies (or atleast, retarded, groomable ones) more amicable in the hopes to increase their izzat with the "normal" in another effort to normalise their inherent degeneracy.

View attachment 8871386 (this is the most popular and outrageous example.)




Looking at the original poster, she has links to rev says desu, and other near "inhuman" categories of people.

While being "le based!", she clearly doesnt have a christpilled viewerbase, and she certainly does endorse it by reposting hilarious fetish art such as this:
View attachment 8871378

Don't let people like this fool you.
It was never wholesome, It was never kino and it never will be. This is an outlet for their diseased fetishes and stance against human life.
Personally what ticks me off is that for people that WANT to treat Diana as their "daughter that they wanna protect" as their weird downplay... their so-called "dad instincts" sure have excused, even allowed the openly loud and proud loli fans in the community to lewd her...
 
Back
Top Bottom