With the whole Pragamata situation, it truly does expose the no-limits factions of the lolisho, pro-shipper, pro-fiction, and adjacent communities.
They are trying to push the limits of what is considered acceptable. It began with, "
It's just drawings of anime characters" to
"Well, yeah, drawing may have a realistic art style, but it's still muh fiction!" Then, too, "
Ok, yeah, the 3D model of the child character is photorealistic, but it's still fiction and not real!"
Also, it wouldn't surprise me if they will try to normalize child sex dolls or robots eventually. They will probably start with child sex dolls with an anime style to eventually realistic looking child sex dolls or robots. "
It's muh plastic! It's not a real child! Somebody being attracted to child sex dolls doesn't make them a pedophile!" will be used to defend this.
They are probably going to normalize AI-generated CSAM at some point too. AI tools can generate eerily realistic-looking children. I hear the lolishos always cope by saying that such tools need to be trained off real-life CSAM. But here is the thing:
that is only applicable in some cases. Some AI generative tools
do not need to be trained off real-life CSAM in order to produce AI-generated CSAM. There have been cases where mainstream AI tools such as Grok generated content that could be considered AI-generated CSAM content.
Their defenses of "
it's fiction" and "it's not real, no child was harmed" can be used to defend a hypothetical AI tool that can generate hyper-realistic porn of AI-generated children. For this context, this tool
was not trained on illegal content. AI tools can combine multiple training data in order to produce a result. For example, training data of normal porn of adults and SFW legal content of children could both be used to produce AI-generated CSAM.
Have you seen those AI-generated videos of different animals being combined into one? For example, there is this popular owl-cat hybrid, and it has become a meme called Meowls. The videos of it are eerily realistic looking, despite no such animal existing in real life. And the way this hybrid animal moves feels like how it would move in real life, if it were real. The AI tools combined both training data of a cat and an owl to produce this hybrid animal.

Now, that begs the question, if the AI tools can do that, then what can they do in combination with legal training data of real-life children?
The exact same flawed defensive arguments lolishos and adjacent communities use to defend their paraphilia, can be used to defend realistic looking child sex dolls/robots and realistic AI-generated CSAM. And such AI-generated content doesn't need to be trained on real CSAM. Therefore, according to their logic, it's still fictional, and thus child sex dolls/robots and AI-generated CSAM should be accepted and tolerated.
This is where they are heading. This is what the no-limits people eventually want to be normalized. And if you dare think that fictional content should have limits, then they will accuse you of being an "
anti" or a "
moralfag" for daring to think that there should be limits and appeals to morality about such content.