Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

harmy.kook said:
Got you, but can't remember where the other two are.
Click to expand...
1776893690505.png
I have little hope for humanity when a shit take like this on our forum gets that ratio.
 
Toxic BRAAAAP Mask said:
View attachment 8898457
I have little hope for humanity when a shit take like this on our forum gets that ratio.
Click to expand...
I dont think he knows what everyone is talking about- it isn't the game necessarily but how it was advertised and how it made a bunch of cucks collectively cum on the screen looking at a little android girl. the girl being in existence isn't the evil thing here, its the people going "ooouugghh cunny!!11!!!" once they see that android.

and albeit this is a generalisation- lolicucks really seethe over shit like an AI image digging up their top #1 pedophile's brothers grave (referring to chibireviews)

Null is completely justified in banning the blind in this scenario, because given this thread- if you read this and come out with a conclusion that everyone here secretly loves kids or something, then you are being deliberately ignorant and we all know what kinds of people do this (lolikuuuuks)
 
A mod that removes Diana's clothes has already been released. She's not naked, but she's only wearing something resembling a metallic swimsuit.

The weirdos in the comments section already know what's coming.

Screenshot - Comments.jpg
 
DaNaFaiche said:
Null is completely justified in banning the blind in this scenario, because given this thread- if you read this and come out with a conclusion that everyone here secretly loves kids or something, then you are being deliberately ignorant and we all know what kinds of people do this (lolikuuuuks)
Click to expand...
Im confused by this one.

Its a robot child. Some freaks are going to cum to it.

Others will play a game and its just a kid and not cum to it.

Edit
Are we upset that there are people claiming you have to be a pedo to recognize that some are going to be freaks about it?

You dont have to be a pedo to know people are going to pedo to this... Just like you dont have to like feet to know people will cum to a stack full of feet pics.
 
Last edited:
DaNaFaiche said:
and albeit this is a generalisation- lolicucks really seethe over shit like an AI image digging up their top #1 pedophile's brothers grave (referring to chibireviews)
Click to expand...
I haven’t seen a response that nuclear since someone said “her mom killed herself so clearly the support wasn’t that great” about Shondo’s dead mom
 
Cheese_lad said:
I remember seeing a few tweets about that situation a while ago.
Click to expand...
Thanks for catching me up, shit has me so MATI. I used to follow the account, they did legitimately help victims out their sexual abusers and exploiters, many of which I can imagine would never have the courage to without a large account doing it on their behalf, not to mention the fact that contacting the authorities isn't always a reliable option, especially when it comes to what occurs on the internet. There aren't many accounts that do this.

It's insane how much of a severe lack of self-awareness these people have. They mindlessly repeat "Care about more children!" so much that the sentence holds zero meaning to them. This account was dedicated to helping out child predators, how are you going to accuse them of caring about fictional children more than real children while openly admitting that you suspended them exactly because you're more concerned about your enjoyment of fictional children than the protection of real children? Unbelievably ridiculous.
 
harmy.kook said:
Got you, but can't remember where the other two are.
Click to expand...
Took a glance through the Pragmata thread. I found 4 total banned users who had spoken in the thread: the two you listed, then Decoy, and Ssj_Ness. Ness posted on the first page of the thread and was banned prior to the loliniggers sperging at Null this most recent time around. Below is the post from Decoy in the Pragmata thread.
1776914477312.png
 

Attachments

  • Gnv2S95bYAMRXtV.jpg
    Gnv2S95bYAMRXtV.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 123
Last edited:
Toxic BRAAAAP Mask said:
View attachment 8898457
I have little hope for humanity when a shit take like this on our forum gets that ratio.
Click to expand...
I've never understood this. Like, no one is calling the child sexy in their head (aside from pedophiles) and getting off to the cucked idea that other people are also getting off to it. It's like a weird double projection where you accuse someone of accusing someone else of what you are actually doing
 
a kiwifarms user said:
Steel Billet said:
In my opinion, no, not all, but I definitely have seen more than a dozen pedos with clippy avatars. The thing about clippy is that it attracts the lowest of the low subhumans who don't actually want to do anything but whine on the Internet. Any time I see someone with a clippy avatar they 99% of the time are spewing some niggerbabble.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
When his video came out, I temporarily joined them in at least putting on a clippy profile thinking "You know what? Fuck it, can't hurt to at least do a bare minimum and see if this does help do anything AT ALL for a while, why not?" as I didn't really care much about my pfp.

After what I could assume is, IDK, 2-6 months, I eventually paid attention to my pfp while changing my Youtube account settings, said "Okay yeah, I should've known that this was clearly fucking stupid and gay", then swapped the image, never wanting to do that shit again.
 
Wilson The Ball said:
I've never understood this. Like, no one is calling the child sexy in their head (aside from pedophiles) and getting off to the cucked idea that other people are also getting off to it. It's like a weird double projection where you accuse someone of accusing someone else of what you are actually doing
Click to expand...
They follow the stupid train of though of "If you suspect this may be pedophilic, they it's on you, not me since i don't think there is anything wrong with it and i enjoy it." It's like saying if someone is paranoid over being poisoned they must be thinking about poisoning someone and they are a danger while them, being people that are interested in chemistry and toxins, have no qualms with anything.

It boils down to them saying that your thoughts betray you and brand you guilty for having reasonable suspicions and while them, despite being caught red handed reveling in their words and actions, are not guilty because they firmly believe there is nothing wrong with it. Very niggercattle train of thought.
indigoisviolet said:
Troonsmirk in the banner
Click to expand...
I've been wondering for a while... How many troons are Vtubers? You would think a shitload of them would be Vtubers since they can mask their grisly identity but they appear to be a minority in the Vtuber Scene
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom