Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

Soyteens successfully phonebooked Pragmata pedophile Slumbrrr (Alex Ruiz) into hiding.
1765690767296.png
1765690920425.png
Archive

 
Soyteens successfully phonebooked Pragmata pedophile Slumbrrr (Alex Ruiz) into hiding.
1765690767296.png
1765690920425.png
Archive
Oh no! How awful, why would he hide like a coward instead of standing his ground? Doesn't he love his "cunny" that "needs correction"?

Pathetic. Sometimes I wonder if them getting brash (and thus, exposed) is good in the long run. Anyways, nice job sharty.
 
There's lolicon/proshipper infighting over the Pragmata shit, it's honestly hilarious.

1765694427004.png1765694737057.png1765694799489.png

Something that Western lolitards don't understand is that photoreastic lolicon is actually pretty common and "normal" in the Japanese lolicon community, it's pure bullcrap that lolicon is defined by an anime or moe style. In general I think these holier than thou "proshipper" people would shit their pants if/when they find out that Japanese lolicons don't even bother trying to look morally superior the way they do.
 
There's lolicon/proshipper infighting over the Pragmata shit, it's honestly hilarious
This is my favorite type of lolicon infighting, because it really exposes the two main types of lolicons, only some fiction and open pedophiles.
 
Last edited:
There's lolicon/proshipper infighting over the Pragmata shit, it's honestly hilarious.

View attachment 8284721View attachment 8284751View attachment 8284754

Something that Western lolitards don't understand is that photoreastic lolicon is actually pretty common and "normal" in the Japanese lolicon community, it's pure bullcrap that lolicon is defined by an anime or moe style. In general I think these holier than thou "proshipper" people would shit their pants if/when they find out that Japanese lolicons don't even bother trying to look morally superior the way they do.
This is my favorite type of lolicon infighting, because it really exposes the two main types of lolicons, only some fiction and pedophiles.
Is it time to bring the old Norm MacDonald quote?
 
I haven’t heard breadtubers defend Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 for having a sex scene with a character who’s based on a real underage historical figure. He praised Vara because having sex with underage boys triggered the Christians. I’m fully convinced he’s a real pedophile. Even Razorfist never gotten this suspicious when it comes to underage shit.
 
Soyteens successfully phonebooked
'Booked because he published a book has to be a new one.
Something that Western lolitards don't understand is that photoreastic lolicon is actually pretty common and "normal" in the Japanese lolicon community, it's pure bullcrap that lolicon is defined by an anime or moe style. In general I think these holier than thou "proshipper" people would shit their pants if/when they find out that Japanese lolicons don't even bother trying to look morally superior the way they do.
The art style defense seems to be a minority position in the west, or at least I rarely see anyone say "umm, children don't look like that." They always say that they're only fictionally pedophiles.
 
Not sure if anyone else has ever made something like this before. I saw some people arguing about loli the other day and they used all these arguments almost word for word. It's like they don't even realize how stupid the things they say are.
PedoCope.png
 
1765737139470.png

The debate reignited following the latest UN Human Rights Council session, where speakers called out Comiket for hosting booths with questionable material. Critics argue that such content violates the spirit of international child protection laws, even if it’s technically legal under Japanese law. Advocacy groups claim Japan’s continued tolerance promotes harmful global trends.
Japanese officials have defended their stance, stating that while some content may appear controversial, it remains protected under the country’s freedom of expression laws. Legal experts argue that fictional characters are not covered by exploitation laws unless they involve real people, a line Japan has been careful not to cross in its legal system.
Link: https://otakukart.com/japan-refuses...omiket-un-condemns-cultural-irresponsibility/


Soyabsolutegem.png
 
Not sure if anyone else has ever made something like this before. I saw some people arguing about loli the other day and they used all these arguments almost word for word. It's like they don't even realize how stupid the things they say are.
View attachment 8286039
Unironically yaoi has a lot of lesbian fans and they say this exact same shit, they swear they're still only a lesbian because "they're fictional, it doesn't count." or because they enjoy the aspect of.. men getting punished/tortured (raped). It's bizarre but hilarious.
 
The art style defense seems to be a minority position in the west, or at least I rarely see anyone say "umm, children don't look like that." They always say that they're only fictionally pedophiles.
I've seen it pop up somewhat regularly over the years but it could be that it's fallen out of favor compared tot just saying "it's fiction". I know it's a talking point that people like Rev & Kirsche have brought up.
 
I've seen it pop up somewhat regularly over the years but it could be that it's fallen out of favor compared tot just saying "it's fiction". I know it's a talking point that people like Rev & Kirsche have brought up
The craziest part is is both copes are utterly retarded:

-The "it's just a body type" cope depends on Western retards totally not knowing that that the basis of it is children historically in Japan.

-And the "it's just Fictional [children]" cope is just mask off Pedophilia, but triggers waaaay more mental gymnastics from that crowd. How they're totally different from Zoophiles who compensate with "Feral" [ie: straight-up drawn Zoophilia]
 
The art style defense seems to be a minority position in the west, or at least I rarely see anyone say "umm, children don't look like that." They always say that they're only fictionally pedophiles.
There's a flip flop argument with it between it along the line of "if anyone looked like this they would be a deformed monstrosity" and "umm ackshually real life women look like this and you're being disrespectful". It's a tactical deflection. Same with the "saving a fictional character" bit.
You know that TLC episode of the guy that fucks his car? You point and laugh at him for being a circus freak moreso than the thought of cleaning cum out of the exhaust.
1765763959719.png
[A]
"The neighbors didn't take in the bins so I'm going to reward myself with porn to spite them". bruh
 
So there’s this capcom game called Pragmata that was shown at the game awards last night, and the pedos are being totally normal about it on xitter.

View attachment 8279452

what does “cracking” mean in loli-terms? Is it the same as cracking an egg like the trannies use it or is it a little more effed up and sexual than that?

And while I don’t condone violence I completely understand why people want to bash these guy’s heads in:

View attachment 8279462
Lock ‘em up!
I want to shove Chise into a TV.
I dread to see what kind of mods Pragmata will get, there is no way Capcom doesn't know the audience they're appealing to here.
Now I know the real reason Capcom started infecting their games with shady Russian anti-mod DRM.
 
Though it would be interesting to see the response if someone like Kirsche spoke out against loli shit
Bout the closest I've heard her condemn lolicon is saying that people who jerk off to toddlercon need to be locked up in a mental institution. How she manages to square the circle where lolicon is totally fine & you shouldn't thought crime people into that cause it's just fiction but toddlercon is the line where we need to lock people up because they're a threat I'd like to know.
 
Last edited:
Bout the closest I've heard her condemn lolicon is saying that people who jerk off to toddlercon need to be locked up in a mental institution. How she manages to square the circle where lolicon is totally fine & you shouldn't thought crime people into that cause it's just fiction but toddlercon is the line where we need to lock people up because they're a threat I'd like to know.
I have taken a course in pathological psychology, and my professor at the time had stated that pedophiles are into very specific age groups depending on physiological developments :cryblood:. As some sort of cope, they act like going for ones lower than their age range is somehow immoral when they are just as screwed in the head.
 
Back
Top Bottom