- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
A lot of the arguments against homosexuality take the same form as those supporting it, being either arguments from nature, or from morality, or from popularity. They're primarily concerned with two things: the motivating cause of the behaviour, and the "rightness" of it, but they never stray too far from the physical nature of homosexuality itself. A homosexual man generally understands that he's a man who wants to have sex with other men. There might be a question about why, but that why is not going to require the creation of an entire framework of irrational beliefs.The problem is the fundamental difference of the "deception."
A homophobe is not someone who thinks homosexual sex does not exist. Homophobes don't think that gay people are not actually gay.
The mechanical reality of homosexuality can be observed. There is no anal force field that curves dick away.
Homosexuality isn't a lie. You can disagree with it, or discourage it, but it can and does happen.
It's pointless to conflate that with what kind of lie transgenders tell. Your mind can be changed one day and you could quit objecting to homosexuality, but having a different take on transgenderism will not make gender identity or transition real.
On the other hand, arguments for transgenderism quickly descend into mysticism, arguing about the nature of an unseen, invisible, inner nature or soul, or innate knowledge of "being" something other than the outward physical expression. They believe, against all evidence to the contrary, that they're actually the opposite sex on the inside, with all of the metaphysical trappings that go along with that claim of innate knowledge. That's the difference in my mind: transgenderism is a statement of faith about unknown and unknowable things.
The same could be said for arguments made by paedophiles and zoophiles, who claim to have innate knowledge of the inner motivations and desires of children and animals, far beyond anything their victims can outwardly express. Probably worthy of a separate post, if I can actually pull this into some sort of coherent framework.