lol. When you inform your entire world view through pornography you assume every woman who goes to college is getting laid out every weekend by BIG BLACK BVLLS.
I'm confident he's not concerned about women abandoning family formation to become workers because they will have casual sex, but because it's completely disastrous for civilization and there is
no country besides Israel that has seen its birth rate survive the process.
Null said:
The number of people having sex is declining. The number of men and women who have zero partners by 30 is going up. The actual perception of extreme hypergamy is not as prevalent as people believe.
You have vagina latched onto your brain like a brainslug if you're able to look at those statistics and see them as symptoms of a healthy society that is becoming more pure.
Null said:
But this is literally the result of pornography.
(...)
I'm certain that inceldom is just Darwinism in the 21st century.
There's nothing Darwinist about human reproduction in the 21st century. Darwinism as a force requires predation (weak) and/or environmental threats (strong). These have been removed as factors from modern civilization. The only thing left holding the reins is human reproductive instincts--namely human female reproductive instincts--allowed to run wild. It's been a disaster. See:
[1] [2]
The idea that the current social condition is good and women are eugenicists is just statistically wrong. You're speaking the same nonsense as "accelerationists" who think that if you work for your enemies you win.
Ceding power to women in most democracies is the same as directly ceding power to Jewish oligarchs. Ceding power to women even in the absence of Jewish influence is a terrible idea, as South Korea found out with its birth rate of 0.6. There is no scenario where doing this benefits anyone besides an upper crust of Hebrew industrialists who receive cheaper labor and reduced white birth rates, with the added bonus that the survivors of this dysgenic process are more retarded and therefore easier to control.
It's not even helpful to women. Women in """gender equal""" societies report lower happiness and wellbeing than women in traditional societies:
[1] [2]
Men who kowtow to their partner and allow their head to be filled with pro-feminist bullshit are not different from people who do business with Jews and subtly find themselves becoming ardent zionists. The only difference is the currency. They surrender for money, you surrender for pussy.
You want to know what misogynist 99% of men agree with? Patrice O'neal. Why? Cause he didn't blame women for all of his fucking problems. He instead had a very simple premise, women do what you as a man let them get away with. It's their nature to push boundries and if you are weak women will own you.
Patrice O'neal was a fat guy who serially fucked prostitutes until he died. I don't know why you use him as a model of healthy male-female relations.