"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

reptile baht spaniard rid said:
there's definitely a subset of "tradlarpers" who are ralph-tier or slightly above who basically hold "yeah, you shouldn't cheat, but a woman cheating is much much worse than a man cheating (because she can get preggers, because cuck, because whatever)". But part of that is because most tradlarpers are men, and many men today have no real idea of personal responsibility for themselves - they'd like to be the only man whore living in a perfect Christian society, doing whatever they want but everyone else is straight and good.
Click to expand...
1) There are 8 BILLION people on earth today. Give me enough time (and it's doable now with social media) and I can find someone advocating for an idea, no matter how stupid. If only 1% OF 1% of the entire world agreed with that idea, that is still 800,000 who believe in the dumb idea. So when you go "many men today..." - yeah, because we're in the age of an insanely large number. You could literally attach ANY belief to that statement and speak truly. What does your statement even prove?

2) Most of them are men - so? Most radfems are women. Literally no point to the claim.

reptile baht spaniard rid said:
They should read Plato's Republic because their hot takes are 2400 years out of date and were lame even back then.

An example of above is the "woman teacher molested students? was she hot? niiiiiiice" that is so common.
Click to expand...
1685728944930.png

Congrats, you caught up to Sargon from like... back in Feb.

Heck they did "ancient roman dating advice" from Juvenal.

And I just picked them because I know Sargon is a lolcow. Give me time and I can find this shit all over right-leaning sites, blogs, and videos going back decades because it's not new. (and you can always tell who's a new convert because they don't know this history)
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: ABE LINN COHN and Nonconsentual Pronouns
Flexo said:
?? I've been bombarded with clips from "whatever" for months now. Not seen anybody advocating for marriage argue that it's ok for men to cheat. Certainly not folks I recognize like Michael Knowles or Mary the Ghost. It sounds more like people are confusing "disagrees with feminists" as being on the same side - but they're not. The pro-marriage folk would fight with the cheaters just as much and often do.
Click to expand...
I’ve seen it but if I hadn’t then we’d be in agreement so take that for what it’s worth to you.

But still the other side is still arguing on men’s behalf politically so Destiny wouldn’t be “wrong” to say they want more control over women on behalf of men. It would just be slimy to say.

Flexo said:
If only 1% OF 1% of the entire world agreed with that idea, that is still 800,000 who believe in the dumb idea. So when you go "many men today..." - yeah, because we're in the age of an insanely large number.
Click to expand...
Sorry for the double-post but I’m seeing the typical run-around here: every time this sort of issue comes up people like you (sorry to say) try to change the subject to the platonic ideal of what these guys believe in. Rather than honestly address what other people bring to the table in a more specific sense. Or just acknowledge that mere words only go so far.

To wit, just because people don’t explicitly advocate cheating (even though one can find plenty of manosphere content saying it’s okay or “no big deal” when a man does it) doesn’t mean they aren’t implicitly advocating cheating.

These guys lead a lifestyle and promote a lifestyle that is highly associated with infidelity by stressing the need for men to be virile and to not restrain themselves if they want to be attractive. And there is a large cottage industry for men to cheat in a lot of countries. Ashley Madison, for example, was a sausage-fest. Or how Andrew Tate (the biggest manosphere guy there is) is obviously unfaithful.

So, given that, it is actually suspicious that they don’t seem to take the risk as seriously as say… your wife having had a previous boyfriend. One issue gets all their rancor while the other gets a cheap antiseptic acknowledgment.

This is why the debate’s context as a political or cultural dispute, rather than a dry academic talk about the nature of marriage in principle, is important to acknowledge. Because it frees us of the awful obligation to pretend these guys are impartial observers

Here are examples btw


5 seconds of searching. And it’s more popular than any radfem video ever was and that sort of content was the impetus of this manosphere backlash.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Winner
Reactions: Johnny Salami, name68126988, WebLurker and 3 others
Flexo said:
And I just picked them because I know Sargon is a lolcow. Give me time and I can find this shit all over right-leaning sites, blogs, and videos going back decades because it's not new. (and you can always tell who's a new convert because they don't know this history)
Click to expand...
Sargon is a lolcow, but he's able to employ people that aren't. The Lotuseaters is one of the few right wing platforms that's been able to attract paying subscribers, they've commissioned actual journalists with name recognition to produce content, and they've even sent a guy to Afghanistan to produce videos.

Unlike Tim Pool or Steven Crowder there aren't a load of sycophants crawling up the owners arse, and generally speaking they produce decent content if it's a little dry. Also Sargon beat Akilah Hughes like a rented mule, to the point where she had to start a crowd funder to pay Sargon his money (he also helped make US copyright law). I can laugh at all the dumb shit Sargon has done, while admitting that lotuseaters is worth £5 a month.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Sneed S. McSneedensen
Flexo said:
?? I've been bombarded with clips from "whatever" for months now. Not seen anybody advocating for marriage argue that it's ok for men to cheat. Certainly not folks I recognize like Michael Knowles or Mary the Ghost. It sounds more like people are confusing "disagrees with feminists" as being on the same side - but they're not. The pro-marriage folk would fight with the cheaters just as much and often do.
Click to expand...
Just off the top of my head, I recall Crowder excusing husbands from adultery by way of it always being the wife's fault while he gave a lecture about wives not being allowed to deny their husbands sex outright at any given time, and Dick Masterson thinks men should be allowed to cheat because they're just going to do it anyway. I can only imagine how many more of those degenerates I can't think of at this moment. To be entirely fair though, I can't remember Masterson's opinions on marriage past that.

ETA: It's not really naming just a few exceptions out of millions when their entire life and livlihood revolves around paypigs who literally pay them money to spout shit they agree with. Also yeah, Gunt too.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Character from a movie, WebLurker, beautiful person and 3 others
If it’s not too arrogant to say I think I’d do better than Destiny on this podcast. Destiny is a cuckold who has never been right wing, while I still am but think most online right wingers are dysfunctional people. So I think I could make the same case more pithily.

On Female Promiscuity vs Male Promiscuity:
“If nothing else, male promiscuity creates female promiscuity. And you can’t deny this because your entire business is telling men how they can easily get sex from women”

Or on literally any subject:
“You’re fine being prejudiced against women, you say it’s from observation and logic or whatever, so let’s talk about niggers.” And then just take their reticence as a spineless compromise.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Johnny Salami, Chiri, fake farts and 3 others
Null said:
LAST CHANCE FOR REQUESTS
Click to expand...
Would you mind covering (no pun intended) Target providing "tuck-friendly" bathing suits in children's sizes by lying about them being for adults on the tags? They carry the suits in XS which isn't a huge deal, but they carry them in XXS and not in the absolute minuscule numbers that even XS normally get stocked in for adult women's clothing. We're supposed to believe that there's a large market of adult men buying this shit in a size that's too small for even a petite adult woman.

ETA: The official models shown for the supposed adult version clearly depict what looks to be at least one teenaged child. I just skimmed that apparently they had upfront child-sized tucking swim bottoms before the Target tail-tuck.

ETA2: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...uck-friendly-swimsuit-fact-check/70251989007/
"Our rating: False
The swimsuit is marketed towards adults, not children, and is offered in sizes XXS through 4X. None of the kids' swimsuits in the Pride section are labeled as "tuck-friendly.""
Holy fucking shit, who is buying this? There is no such thing as an adult man without some kind of horrible physical defect who could ever fit into one of those.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
Reactions: WebLurker
section3teen said:
do it over phone
just please dont cancel today, even if late
Click to expand...
Yes null, I'm sure you'd get a large amounts of new fans doing a PPP sytle face/phone stream from your home.
Null said:
LAST CHANCE FOR REQUESTS
Click to expand...
Might be too late for this episode, but it looks like reddit powerjannies are planning a new mod rebellion/blackout over the changes to the monitization of Reddit API access. This will destroy pretty much every 3rd party app and is likely intended to force everyone to use the fairly unpopular official app. A lot of this started brewing on the /r/ApolloApp subreddit with the dev coming forward and saying the proposed changes would cost him 20 million dollars a year at current user volume. There is also talk about completely removing API access to porn subs, and the large increase in cost of API access will destroy mod tools (the jannies I'm sure are equally mad about both). It has already destroyed pushshift a popular tool used by mod bots and sites like undidit which allowed people to see deleted/removed comments.
As with any planned jannie rebellion former /r/Drama users are taking the opportunity to leak the chats planning this protest; Trigger warning: rdrama link 2nd link. There's a lot to go through, and I haven't gotten everything all nice and archived for the reddit general thread, but it contains a lot of familiar faces for those who follow reddit mod drama or the /r/ThePlace 2022 incidents: Merari01, bardfinn, N8TheGr8, conalfisher, and BelleArial have all made appearances.
The contents are pretty funny and lighthearted, lots of self-righteous mods and powermods convincing each other of their greatness. There was a plan to present a list of grievances and demands to reddit admins which included writing it in ChatGPT (I guess none of them are confident in their writing skills). There's some hysterics about how their super secret discord has been infiltrated and is getting leaked. There's always the question of reddit mod unionization that comes up from some self-styled friend of the free laborers. Anyway, it might not be worth talking about unless it actually blows up, but it's something to keep on the radar for janny bashing. There's also some mod pedo accusations getting thrown around, for extra spice.
E: sorry, I'd add pictures, but tor is crawling for me right now.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: clipartfan92 and Balldo's Gate
Null said:
LAST CHANCE FOR REQUESTS
Click to expand...
You probably already have this, but if not, Twitter made a public announcement they were going to ban the "What is a woman?" documentary from Daily Wire, which was posted by Daily Wire for free on Twitter.


Musk said Twitter was not going to do that, but someone at Twitter did it anyway, the posting had a Twitter warning declaring this was hate speech because of "misgendering" and the video was shadow banned regardless of Musk statements.

The warning was lifted a few hours later, and Ella Irwin, head of Trust and Safety (Chief Janny Officer), quit Twitter today.

She is also the person who unbanned Ralph, apparently an acquaintance to Ali Alexander, the AF pedo.

Musk then retweet the video to boost it after it was un-shadow banned.


BTW, did you hear there is a Head Janny opening available at Twitter? Maybe you can apply for it.

Also:

Commie Ice Cream Ben & Jerry's has decided they will end advertisement on Twitter due to hate speech:

I think this deserves a lispy reading, lol

Ben & Jerry’s business model is built around the idea that every decision we make, and every dollar we spend in the course of our day-to-day operations is an opportunity to advance our progressive values.

That’s why we have made the decision to end all paid advertising spending on Twitter.

We’ve watched with great concern the developments at Twitter following Elon Musk’s purchase of the social media platform. Hate speech is up dramatically while content moderation has become all but non-existent. In addition to the changes on the platform that have led to an increase in hate speech, Musk himself has doubled down on dangerous anti-democratic lies and white nationalist hate speech. The platform has become a threatening and even dangerous space for people from so many backgrounds, including people who are Black, Brown, trans, gay, women, people with disabilities, Jewish, Muslim and the list goes on. This is unconscionable in addition to being plain bad business.

That is why we’re proud to join our partners in the business, civil and human rights community in taking a stand against these harmful changes at Twitter. Musk and Twitter’s toxicity and tacit endorsement of hate and violence goes against everything our company stands for. Twitter must act today to end the extremist and violent content on the platform. Until that happens, Ben & Jerry’s will spend no money with Twitter and we call on all businesses and partners to do the same.

For the time being, we will continue to maintain a presence on the platform to connect with our community, but will revisit that presence as needed pending developments in this space.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: frap, Dixieland Buckaroo and Nonconsentual Pronouns
Ben and Jerry are not communists dude, they are multi-killionaire bourgeois liberals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fake farts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back