"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It sure is interesting that journalists see self-harm as a tool for "protesting" something you want to change as glamourised method to achieve it. Journalists seem to glorify following methods in a better light:
  • Starving yourself ("Hunger strikes")
  • Setting oneself on fire ("Self-immolation")
  • Chaining yourself ("Lock-on")
But targeting journalists and politicians with methods that would result in the same conditions on them (weakened state or death) as a "bad thing", which is the most effective one... But that is something every single journalists will write as the worst sin in a "democracy". So journalists will write it is a "good thing to kill yourself" for an issue, but not the politicians (and associated journalists) in question...

I'm calling this a psyop. Making yourself weaker and then expecting your enemies to then listen to you is the most retarded tactic for leverage ever. This is a ploy to make it a virtue to make "problematic" people take themselves out. Now every politician can sleep well knowing that if someone is unhappy, they will just kill themselves intead of someone going after them.

It gets even more retarded when you are considering the fact that the strategy here is to try to collect "sympathizing points" from the public, to use it with people who absolutley don't give a shit about you. I seriously think it's all just fake and gay to encurage this retarded behavour so real protesters don't get any other ideas.

TL;DR If you want a change, target your enemies, not yourself. You won't be able to do shit if you are a cripple or dead.

This nigga really doesn't understand what a dogwhistle even is
LMAO, he sure is good at deradicalizing people by avoiding the math in question. Anyways... I will still use the very esoteric meme and subtle dogwhistle that is very hard for normies to notice: "Pregnant Anne Frank".
Some troll keeps feeding him shitposts as "material" for his channel, I just know it.
 
Last edited:
"We can safely make one prophecy: whatever the outcome of this war, the British Empire is at an end. It has been mortally wounded. The future of the British people is to die of hunger and tuberculosis in their cursed island." -AH
"I don't see much future for the Americans ... it's a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities ... my feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep repugnance ... everything about the behaviour of American society reveals that it's half Judaised, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?"

Gotta give it to him, he had some interesting quotes for a humble painter.
 
Prolific and infamous Internet troll Joshua Goldberg had a bait article written by him under a false name taken as fact by Elon Musk.
One of Joshua's bait articles (under the fake name of Emily Goldberg) about why White people dying is a good thing was recently reposted to Xitter as legitimate by user ALEX (@ajtourville).
View attachment 6491696 (L/A)
View attachment 6491697View attachment 6491698 View attachment 6491699
View attachment 6491700
(Medium link)
View attachment 6491705
(ProPublica link)
With the post gaining some traction, fucking Elon Musk quoted the original post, believing that it was a real article written by a real person.
View attachment 6491704 (L/A)
 
EthanIsOnline has trooned out and is now “Eden”
(link)
Peethan .jpg
He kinda looks familar :thinking:
Jewshthan.jpg
 
Last edited:
This nigga really doesn't understand what a dogwhistle even is
He didn't even mention the "holocaust of bullets." Probably because he doesn't know anything about it and has never read a single primary source on the subject. He said 6 million died in death camps alone (modern claim is 2.7m). This nigga isn't just out of touch, he's fucking retarded.
 
They changed it, but for a time here in alberta, police could issue a breathalyzer if you were reported to be drinking and driving, even after you got home. So they wouldn't actually catch you committing a crime, but still charge you with it.

The courts ruled police couldn't do it, and even went as far as to say they can't breathalyze on private property.
 
Having worked in CS before, anything below a 10/10 was basically failing. The metrics were always dumb with how management graded them. You'd think 8/10, 9/10 would be great, but when your target is 95% you can only tolerate 1 or 2 lower scores and 1/10 may be unrecoverable for the month. So yes I approve of giving them a 1/10.
 
This wouldn't work in most of America because people have already done it and there's case law. It's still pretty funny someone managed to make it stick. Also you'd be violating open container laws in most places.

The argument would be some combination of calculating the previous BAC based on how much that amount of alcohol would have changed it, and that the defendant wouldn't have done that other than to baffle a BAC. In a lot of places, refusing to take a BAC test is also a separate crime, and deliberately messing it up would break this law too.

Also in a lot of places merely being in possession of the car keys while in the driver's seat (or even just in the car even in the backseat) while intoxicated is the offense, so again, you'd obviously be intoxicated after drinking a large bottle of alcohol, even weak soju.
 
Back