"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
4090 Chad said:
The Onion (as owned by faggot journo Ben Collins) has purchased Infowars via silent auction as the government has stripped Alex Jones of his lifes work.

View attachment 6644850
Archive

View attachment 6644868
Click to expand...
1731624173066.png
Today we celebrate a new addition to the Global Tetrahedron LLC family of brands. And let me say, I really do see it as a family. Much like family members, our brands are abstract nodes of wealth, interchangeable assets for their patriarch to absorb and discard according to the opaque whims of the market. And just like family members, our brands regard one another with mutual suspicion and malice.

All told, the decision to acquire InfoWars was an easy one for the Global Tetrahedron executive board.

Founded in 1999 on the heels of the Satanic “panic” and growing steadily ever since, InfoWars has distinguished itself as an invaluable tool for brainwashing and controlling the masses. With a shrewd mix of delusional paranoia and dubious anti-aging nutrition hacks, they strive to make life both scarier and longer for everyone, a commendable goal. They are a true unicorn, capable of simultaneously inspiring public support for billionaires and stoking outrage at an inept federal state that can assassinate JFK but can’t even put a man on the Moon.

Through it all, InfoWars has shown an unswerving commitment to manufacturing anger and radicalizing the most vulnerable members of society—values that resonate deeply with all of us at Global Tetrahedron.

No price would be too high for such a cornucopia of malleable assets and minds. And yet, in a stroke of good fortune, a formidable special interest group has outwitted the hapless owner of InfoWars (a forgettable man with an already-forgotten name) and forced him to sell it at a steep bargain: less than one trillion dollars.

Make no mistake: This is a coup for our company and a well-deserved victory for multinational elites the world over.

What’s next for InfoWars remains a live issue. The excess funds initially allocated for the purchase will be reinvested into our philanthropic efforts that include business school scholarships for promising cult leaders, a charity that donates elections to at-risk third world dictators, and a new pro bono program pairing orphans with stable factory jobs at no cost to the factories.

As for the vitamins and supplements, we are halting their sale immediately. Utilitarian logic dictates that if we can extend even one CEO’s life by 10 minutes, diluting these miracle elixirs for public consumption is an unethical waste. Instead, we plan to collect the entire stock of the InfoWars warehouses into a large vat and boil the contents down into a single candy bar–sized omnivitamin that one executive (I will not name names) may eat in order to increase his power and perhaps become immortal.

All will be revealed in due time. For now, let’s enjoy this win and toast to the continued consolidation of power and capital.

Infinite Growth Forever,


Bryce P. Tetraeder, Global Tetrahedron CEO
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, botrix_fan and Oxyjen
@Null The ghost of Tarrant is smiling as the Maori's in New ZeaLand are chimping out with a protest Haka dance in Parliament as a new bill that re-interprets the Waitungi Treaty that set forth their privileges is due for a vote.
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/new-ze...erpretation-for-waitangi-maori-treaty.204722/
The youngest member of New Zealand’s parliament, Māori Party MP Hana-Rawhiti Kareariki Maipi-Clarke, started a haka to protest the first vote on a contentious bill that would reinterpret a 184-year-old treaty between the British and Indigenous Maori. The parliament was briefly suspended on Thursday after the protest. First signed in 1840 between the British Crown and more than 500 Maori chiefs, the Treaty of Waitangi lays down how the two parties agreed to govern. The interpretation of clauses in the document still guides legislation and policy today.

The Treaty Principles Bill has been released: Here's what's in it /
Watch: Haka interrupts vote for the Treaty Principles Bill
A haka led by Te Pāti Māori interrupted voting for the Treaty Principles Bill this afternoon.

Opposition MPs and the public gallery stood to perform Ka Mate, after Hauraki Waikato MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke stood to deliver her Te Pāti Māori's vote against the bill.

The Speaker, Gerry Brownlee, who had expressed his lack of patience with a number of MPs for their interjections throughout the afternoon, suspended the sitting until the bells next ring.

---
The four-page Treaty Principles Bill has been introduced and will be debated in Parliament next week.
As with all bills, the text begins with an explanatory note, includes links to some of the advice provided about it, such as a regulatory impact statement, and sets out the specific wording the law would change if enacted.
All parties other than ACT have committed to voting the bill down at the second reading after it has been to select committee, which would stop it from passing into law.
The bill states it would set out the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi in legislation, and requires those principles to be used when interpreting legislation, where relevant.
The bill's final clause states nothing in the bill would amend the text of the Treaty of Waitangi or Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
A group of protestors had gathered in Auckland's Newmarket. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi
The principles set out in the bill as introduced are:

Principle 1: The Executive Government of New Zealand has full power to govern, and the Parliament of New Zealand has full power to make laws, (a) in the best interests of everyone; and (b) in accordance with the rule of law and the maintenance of a free and democratic society.
Principle 2: (1) The Crown recognises, and will respect and protect, the rights that hapū and iwi Māori had under the Treaty of Waitangi/te Tiriti o Waitangi at the time they signed it. (2) However, if those rights differ from the rights of everyone, subclause (1) applies only if those rights are agreed in the settlement of a historical treaty claim under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975
Principle 3: (1) Everyone is equal before the law. (2) Everyone is entitled, without discrimination, to (a) the equal protection and equal benefit of the law; and (b) the equal enjoyment of the same fundamental human rights.

The bill also states that principles of the Treaty "other than those set out" by the Treaty Principles Bill "must not be used to interpret an enactment", and clarifies that the Treaty Principles Bill does not apply to the interpretation of a Treaty settlement Act or the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 in relation to historical treaty claims.
Read more:

Explainer: The history of the Treaty Principles Bill

The bill's champion, ACT's David Seymour, hailed the introduction of the bill in a media release saying the principles of the Treaty "are not going anywhere".
"Either Parliament can define them, or the courts will continue to meddle in this area of critical political and constitutional importance. The purpose of the Treaty Principles Bill is for Parliament to define the principles of the Treaty, provide certainty and clarity, and promote a national conversation about their place in our constitutional arrangements."
He noted a change made to the earlier version, with the second principle having been narrowed "to provide that the rights of hapū and iwi differ from the rights everyone has a reasonable expectation to enjoy only when those rights are agreed to as part of a Treaty settlement. This has occurred because the previous wording was too broad".

The Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill.
He said the Treaty itself would not be changed, just the way it was interpreted in law.
Timeline

Bill introduced to Parliament 7 November
Hīkoi protesting the bill begins on 10 November, departing Cape Reinga on the 11th, to arrive at Parliament on 19 November
First reading debate on the bill during the week of 11-15 November. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon will not be in the country during that reading
After first reading, Bill to be sent to select committee for six-month public hearing process
After select committee, Bill to be sent for second reading debate in Parliament - where all parties but ACT have promised to vote it down

Kerfuffle over early introduction
News broke on Tuesday that the bill would be introduced to Parliament this week - a fortnight earlier than had previously been expected.
The change in timing came as the Waitangi Tribunal scrambled to publish the second part of its report on the Bill, and the treaty clause review set out in NZ First's coalition agreement.
It was a scramble because the Tribunal is typically unable to publish material related to government bills once they have been introduced.
Once it had been notified of the changed timing through an official memo from the government, it then informed the lawyers presenting evidence for its report so they could submit all their evidence in time.
Seymour accused the Tribunal of breaking the government's trust over the matter.
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi also condemned the earlier introduction, saying he believed it was aimed at halting the planned hīkoi. (The organisers have said they would not reschedule the hīkoi.)
Seymour said it was "much ado about nothing", however, and the change in date was simply part of normal Parliamentary processes.
That's somewhat backed up by most of the political parties, with Labour's Chris Hipkins saying they would not normally expect to be informed of a change in the date of introduction. The Greens, meanwhile, welcomed having the detail of the bill to scrutinise.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon on Thursday defended the timing of the bill's introduction, saying he totally disagreed with the suggestion it was shifted to avoid the hīkoi.
"Totally disagree ... we've got a lot of legislation to do between now and Christmas and what we're doing here is when legislation becomes available - in this case it was a couple of weeks earlier, it was drafted, and the legislation's ready to go - we move legislation around all the time, so it's not unusual at all."
Luxon will not be in Parliament today for the bill's official tabling in the Debating Chamber - like other recent prime ministers he does not attend on Thursdays.
He will also not be in Parliament for the First Reading debate set down for next Thursday, as he will be in Peru for the APEC meeting. He will be at Parliament on the week of the planned hīkoi.
Tribunal's findings
The Tribunal's second report on the bill found that:

The Crown's process to develop the Bill has purposefully excluded any consultation with Māori, breaching the principle of partnership, the Crown's good-faith obligations, and the Crown's duty to actively protect Māori rights and interests
This policy process is in breach of the principle of good government, as Cabinet has decided to progress the Bill despite it being a policy that is not evidence-based, has not been adequately tested, has not been consulted upon, and fails regulatory standards
The proposed content of the Bill does not reflect the texts or meaning of the Treaty/te Tiriti
Principle 1 misinterprets the kāwanatanga granted to the Crown in 1840, which is not an unbridled power restrained only by its own sense of what is in the best interests of everyone
Cabinet's approval of Principle 2 for introduction in a Bill was found to be a breach of the principles of tino rangatiratanga, kāwanatanga, partnership, and active protection
Principle 2, if enacted, would revoke the promises and guarantees the Queen made to Māori in 1840
Principle 3 bears no resemblance to the meaning of article 3 and that Cabinet's decision to introduce the principle in a Bill was a breach of the Treaty/te Tiriti principles of partnership, equity, and active protection
These breaches caused significant prejudice to Māori
Māori would be particularly prejudiced by the extinguishment of tino rangatiratanga in a legal sense if the Bill were to be enacted
The new principles would advance the discredited agenda of assimilation, as they are designed to end the distinct status of Māori as the indigenous people of this country
Even if the Bill were not enacted, Cabinet's decision to introduce the Bill would prejudice Māori by further damaging the Māori-Crown relationship, and Māori would feel the brunt of the social disorder and division, including through the select committee process.
If the Government does not abandon the Bill, the Tribunal recommended that, given the constitutional significance of the issue, the Bill be referred to the Tribunal under section 8(2) of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975

Seymour told RNZ he had not read the report in full, but he had seen summaries.

"Their criticism is not surprising, in fact it's expected because the Treaty Principles Bill by defining the principles does the job that they've been supposed to do for the last 48 years, so it's not surprising that they resent that job being done by Parliament. Parliament asked them to do it in 1975, and Parliament has the right to say 'Well, if you haven't done a very good job we're going to do it for you'."
He pushed back at the suggestion his bill was not a faithful interpretation.

"I'd just make the argument that any interpretation of the Treaty must be consistent with a liberal democracy and give equal rights to each person that has to live in this country, as the only country they have.

"Their version says that the Treaty is a partnership and that some people are in partnership with the Crown and others are not. Their version is inconsistent with a liberal democratic framework and that's why I think it's time for Parliament to step in and say 'actually we do want to respect the treaty, we'd like to honour the treaty, but in a way that gives equal rights to all because that's how liberal democracy works."
Click to expand...
 
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, pantacosm, Helvítis Túristi and 7 others
It appears a heckin brave tranny tried to suicide bait around an electric substation in Utah today,



Daily Mail article referring to this tranny as a woman.

This individual may have also shit themselves as they were getting in the basket

1731624308672.png

edit: I have not seen an article to confirm this is actually a tranny. Just going based on appearance here.
 
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Chi, byuuWasTaken, pantacosm and 15 others
prollyanotherlurker said:
On the what is Rekieta on question.

There are quite a few things people can get messed up on these days that will let you get around a drug test. The most popular options are, kratom, kava kava, and k2 (serenity/sythetic marijuana).

Kratom, and kava kava are both basically plants that happen to get you high and are easy to get a hold of now days. kratom feels like an opiate, like you took some vicodin. Kava kava acts more like a muscle relaxer, or alcohol.
Click to expand...
He's not on Kratom or Kava.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, Hantavirus, Hamstirer and 3 others
daniel day said:
He's not on Kratom or Kava.
Click to expand...
I mean, I personally don't think kratom probably.

Kava is harder to say. Because he literally sounded the same as when he was drinking. So he was either drinking. Or on something with similar effects. Like kava. Which, can actually get you pretty high if you get the right stuff and take enough. Same with kratom.

There could be other things he was taking. Like I said about getting a prescription.

But of course. This is all assuming he is at least trying to be smart and avoid failing the tests. Another option is he is planning to try faking the test. With the shampoo they sell on corner stores/head shops. Or he literally decided he didn't give a fuck and is just doing what he did before the arrest.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: Hantavirus
prollyanotherlurker said:
I mean, I personally don't think kratom probably.

Kava is harder to say. Because he literally sounded the same as when he was drinking. So he was either drinking. Or on something with similar effects. Like kava. Which, can actually get you pretty high if you get the right stuff and take enough. Same with kratom.

There could be other things he was taking. Like I said about getting a prescription.

But of course. This is all assuming he is at least trying to be smart and avoid failing the tests. Another option is he is planning to try taking the test. With the shampoo they sell on corner stores/head shops. Or he literally decided he didn't give a fuck and is just doing what he did before the arrest.
Click to expand...
I say he's not because he very well could be completely sober and coming down from years of extreme alcohol abuse. Serious addicts (the type that have an ounce of cocaine for personal use) have serious physical effects (like slurred speech) that linger if they used their substances long enough, especially alcohol. I don't think he's sober, but I don't think even if he was that it would matter much. My guess is he's still drinking liquor.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mrfresh
daniel day said:
I say he's not because he very well could be completely sober and coming down from years of extreme alcohol abuse. Serious addicts (the type that have an ounce of cocaine for personal use) have serious physical effects (like slurred speech) that linger if they used their substances long enough, especially alcohol. I don't think he's sober, but I don't think even if he was that it would matter much. My guess is he's still drinking liquor.
Click to expand...
Just in my experience stated above. Being a sober addict, and working with addicts. That's not what it sounded like to me. Usually the first few weeks would be when that would be super noticable.

Following that for the next year or so depending on the drug you will be in PAWS (post acute withdrawal syndrome). Which will have some effects on mood, and even some physical effects like temporarily being uncoordinated at times.

What I saw with him wasn't someone in early sobriety. It was someone that was messed up. I've seen people that were literally on deaths door come in and get sober. And it's a very noticeable change within a month. You generally won't see someone get sober. Start acting sober, then suddenly they seem exactly like they did when they are using. Unless they are using.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, gmax alcremie, clipartfan92 and 4 others
4090 Chad said:
It appears a heckin brave tranny tried to suicide bait around an electric substation in Utah today,

View attachment 6646000

Daily Mail article referring to this tranny as a woman.

This individual may have also shit themselves as they were getting in the basket

View attachment 6646029

edit: I have not seen an article to confirm this is actually a tranny. Just going based on appearance here.
Click to expand...
It's just never enough for these fucking retards. It'll never be enough. Long ago now, are the days, when these idiots would just keep to themselves and leave polite society alone.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, Hantavirus and I'm a Silly
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back