"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: beautiful person, Wright, Croak & Caw and 12 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: El-ahrairah and I'm a Silly
The Backwards Man said:
Should've done that before Bidens inauguration. Still doesn't undo the torture they all faced.

Better late than never, I guess.
Click to expand...
I agree that it was all bullshit. However I am willing to give Trump some leeway because I don't know if he had any idea how horrific things would go. I don't know if anyone has ever even asked him why he didn't pardon them all in '21 and if he regrets not doing it. I also think with Biden blatantly using pardons to benefit himself has broken any and all taboo there might have been with issuing them.

I hope they can find some restitution by suing the ever loving fuck out of the fucking feds.
:optimistic:
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Wright, Croak & Caw, I'm a Silly and 1 other person
Ralph Barnhardt said:
I don't know if anyone has ever even asked him why he didn't pardon them all in '21 and if he regrets not doing it
Click to expand...
He basically said it was pandemonium in the last two weeks and people were giving him bad advice about the possibility of doing a blanket pardon and telling he would need names and specific charges. I've never really decided how much I believed that, but I'm willing to settle for it happening on day 1. The guy's inaugural address was basically "all those campaign promises, I meant 'em and I'm gonna get to work immediately", and then he did - which is essentially unprecedented in presidential politics from what I can see. I'm willing to let my nigga cook since the early results are so insanely good.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: El-ahrairah, Pedophobe, Not A Cat Person and 5 others
The official TTD executive order: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...g-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/

DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers. This is wrong. Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system. Basing Federal policy on truth is critical to scientific inquiry, public safety, morale, and trust in government itself.

This unhealthy road is paved by an ongoing and purposeful attack against the ordinary and longstanding use and understanding of biological and scientific terms, replacing the immutable biological reality of sex with an internal, fluid, and subjective sense of self unmoored from biological facts. Invalidating the true and biological category of “woman” improperly transforms laws and policies designed to protect sex-based opportunities into laws and policies that undermine them, replacing longstanding, cherished legal rights and values with an identity-based, inchoate social concept.

Accordingly, my Administration will defend women’s rights and protect freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.

Sec. 2. Policy and Definitions. It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality, and the following definitions shall govern all Executive interpretation of and application of Federal law and administration policy:

(a) “Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female. “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”

(b) “Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.

(c) “Men” or “man” and “boys” or “boy” shall mean adult and juvenile human males, respectively.

(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.

(f) “Gender ideology” replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true. Gender ideology includes the idea that there is a vast spectrum of genders that are disconnected from one’s sex. Gender ideology is internally inconsistent, in that it diminishes sex as an identifiable or useful category but nevertheless maintains that it is possible for a person to be born in the wrong sexed body.

(g) “Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex.

Sec. 3. Recognizing Women Are Biologically Distinct From Men. (a) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide to the U.S. Government, external partners, and the public clear guidance expanding on the sex-based definitions set forth in this order.

(b) Each agency and all Federal employees shall enforce laws governing sex-based rights, protections, opportunities, and accommodations to protect men and women as biologically distinct sexes. Each agency should therefore give the terms “sex”, “male”, “female”, “men”, “women”, “boys” and “girls” the meanings set forth in section 2 of this order when interpreting or applying statutes, regulations, or guidance and in all other official agency business, documents, and communications.

(c) When administering or enforcing sex-based distinctions, every agency and all Federal employees acting in an official capacity on behalf of their agency shall use the term “sex” and not “gender” in all applicable Federal policies and documents.

(d) The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall implement changes to require that government-issued identification documents, including passports, visas, and Global Entry cards, accurately reflect the holder’s sex, as defined under section 2 of this order; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall ensure that applicable personnel records accurately report Federal employees’ sex, as defined by section 2 of this order.

(e) Agencies shall remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications or other messages. Agency forms that require an individual’s sex shall list male or female, and shall not request gender identity. Agencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.

(f) The prior Administration argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which addressed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, requires gender identity-based access to single-sex spaces under, for example, Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act. This position is legally untenable and has harmed women. The Attorney General shall therefore immediately issue guidance to agencies to correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) to sex-based distinctions in agency activities. In addition, the Attorney General shall issue guidance and assist agencies in protecting sex-based distinctions, which are explicitly permitted under Constitutional and statutory precedent.

(g) Federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology. Each agency shall assess grant conditions and grantee preferences and ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology.

Sec. 4. Privacy in Intimate Spaces. (a) The Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that males are not detained in women’s prisons or housed in women’s detention centers, including through amendment, as necessary, of Part 115.41 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations and interpretation guidance regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act.

(b) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall prepare and submit for notice and comment rulemaking a policy to rescind the final rule entitled “Equal Access in Accordance with an Individual’s Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs” of September 21, 2016, 81 FR 64763, and shall submit for public comment a policy protecting women seeking single-sex rape shelters.

(c) The Attorney General shall ensure that the Bureau of Prisons revises its policies concerning medical care to be consistent with this order, and shall ensure that no Federal funds are expended for any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.

(d) Agencies shall effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity.

Sec. 5. Protecting Rights. The Attorney General shall issue guidance to ensure the freedom to express the binary nature of sex and the right to single-sex spaces in workplaces and federally funded entities covered by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In accordance with that guidance, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Labor, the General Counsel and Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and each other agency head with enforcement responsibilities under the Civil Rights Act shall prioritize investigations and litigation to enforce the rights and freedoms identified.

Sec. 6. Bill Text. Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs shall present to the President proposed bill text to codify the definitions in this order.

Sec. 7. Agency Implementation and Reporting. (a) Within 120 days of the date of this order, each agency head shall submit an update on implementation of this order to the President, through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. That update shall address:

(i) changes to agency documents, including regulations, guidance, forms, and communications, made to comply with this order; and

(ii) agency-imposed requirements on federally funded entities, including contractors, to achieve the policy of this order.

(b) The requirements of this order supersede conflicting provisions in any previous Executive Orders or Presidential Memoranda, including but not limited to Executive Orders 13988 of January 20, 2021, 14004 of January 25, 2021, 14020 and 14021 of March 8, 2021, and 14075 of June 15, 2022. These Executive Orders are hereby rescinded, and the White House Gender Policy Council established by Executive Order 14020 is dissolved.

(c) Each agency head shall promptly rescind all guidance documents inconsistent with the requirements of this order or the Attorney General’s guidance issued pursuant to this order, or rescind such parts of such documents that are inconsistent in such manner. Such documents include, but are not limited to:

(i) “The White House Toolkit on Transgender Equality”;

(ii) the Department of Education’s guidance documents including:

(A) “2024 Title IX Regulations: Pointers for Implementation” (July 2024);

(B) “U.S. Department of Education Toolkit: Creating Inclusive and Nondiscriminatory School Environments for LGBTQI+ Students”;

(C) “U.S. Department of Education Supporting LGBTQI+ Youth and Families in School” (June 21, 2023);

(D) “Departamento de Educación de EE.UU. Apoyar a los jóvenes y familias LGBTQI+ en la escuela” (June 21, 2023);

(E) “Supporting Intersex Students: A Resource for Students, Families, and Educators” (October 2021);

(F) “Supporting Transgender Youth in School” (June 2021);

(G) “Letter to Educators on Title IX’s 49th Anniversary” (June 23, 2021);

(H) “Confronting Anti-LGBTQI+ Harassment in Schools: A Resource for Students and Families” (June 2021);

(I) “Enforcement of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 With Respect to Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Light of Bostock v. Clayton County” (June 22, 2021);

(J) “Education in a Pandemic: The Disparate Impacts of COVID-19 on America’s Students” (June 9, 2021); and

(K) “Back-to-School Message for Transgender Students from the U.S. Depts of Justice, Education, and HHS” (Aug. 17, 2021);

(iii) the Attorney General’s Memorandum of March 26, 2021 entitled “Application of Bostock v. Clayton County to Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972″; and

(iv) the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s “Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace” (April 29, 2024).

Sec. 8. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

(d) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe, Jimmy Dean Bowl, Croak & Caw and 5 others
geckogoy said:
>summons child to him
'anyone who causes the little ones to stumble should be drowned like the vile nigger they are'

This is an extremely low IQ thing to attempt to take metaphorically


Literally have the drown child abusers passage quoted to you and continue to insist you didn't see it, what variety of bottom of the barrel retard are you
Click to expand...

but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.
Click to expand...
In your opinion, how much does the word "sin" cover? It's probably wider than "abuse" as we understand that word in the 21st century western liberal democratic world.

Just say it's your interpretation, and nobody would have a problem with it. Don't lie about what the bible actually says. That's the priest's job.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: WhitePanther1776, Corduroy Incognito and geckogoy
waffle said:
He basically said it was pandemonium in the last two weeks and people were giving him bad advice about the possibility of doing a blanket pardon and telling he would need names and specific charges.
Click to expand...
I can believe it. There were fucking generals fucking bragging about fucking lying to Trump about troop deployment so they could keep their fucking forever war going on forever. I really hope orange man burnt his tiny hands on the stove of surrounding himself with ass kissers. I really want this shit unfucked.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Agree
Reactions: El-ahrairah, waffle, I'm a Silly and 2 others
Screenshot_20250121_030823.jpg

Teamspeak is doing a total revamp of their software, promising alot of features that discord currently has but for much cheaper.

It now looks like you can choose to buy a server via Teamspeak, or you can selfhost.

It will be released later today.

 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gauf, Chi, Seething Troon Collector and 29 others
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Critical Raxx Theory, Wright, Neodymium-60 and 3 others
Scorpion From MK said:
View attachment 6880393
View attachment 6880407
View attachment 6880411
View attachment 6880414
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/dO3Io , https://archive.md/wip/9vn0e)

View attachment 6880420
(https://archive.md/GkC9U , https://ghostarchive.org/archive/k3uuN)


View attachment 6880429
(https://archive.md/9Z7Op , https://ghostarchive.org/archive/p7Vt9)

EDIT:
View attachment 6880476
View attachment 6880478
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/kCdt3 , https://ghostarchive.org/archive/u5v6t)
Deorio's statement.
Click to expand...
image_2025-01-20_225252717.png
We got a shout out!
The Backwards Man said:
Should've done that before Bidens inauguration. Still doesn't undo the torture they all faced.

Better late than never, I guess.
Click to expand...
Ralph Barnhardt said:
I agree that it was all bullshit. However I am willing to give Trump some leeway because I don't know if he had any idea how horrific things would go. I don't know if anyone has ever even asked him why he didn't pardon them all in '21 and if he regrets not doing it. I also think with Biden blatantly using pardons to benefit himself has broken any and all taboo there might have been with issuing them.

I hope they can find some restitution by suing the ever loving fuck out of the fucking feds.
:optimistic:
Click to expand...
waffle said:
He basically said it was pandemonium in the last two weeks and people were giving him bad advice about the possibility of doing a blanket pardon and telling he would need names and specific charges. I've never really decided how much I believed that, but I'm willing to settle for it happening on day 1. The guy's inaugural address was basically "all those campaign promises, I meant 'em and I'm gonna get to work immediately", and then he did - which is essentially unprecedented in presidential politics from what I can see. I'm willing to let my nigga cook since the early results are so insanely good.
Click to expand...
I agree that he should have done the pardon before everyone was literally maimed and tortured by feral jigaboos for 4 years. Wasn't it bad enough that two niggers killed two women? It's unforgivable, but his retarded supporters won't turn on him.
he who has thus come/gone said:
The official TTD executive order:
Click to expand...
I wonder who wrote it because he was saying "gender" instead of "sex" just a couple of weeks ago, making it sound like this EO is going to be toothless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beautiful person and Ralph Barnhardt
A lot of people say gender instead of sex because sex is more "lewd" to say out loud. It's often not conscious. Most people aren't aware of the history of the term gender and simply view it the same as sex. Gender is only this idea other than your biology to weirdos. To everyone else they're interchangeable terms much to the dismay of said weirdos.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: El-ahrairah, beautiful person, Pedophobe and 4 others
A faggot tranny has declared that he will kill any republicans he encounters irl. Subsequent videos on his TikTok account claim that it was just a prank bro.

William Tyndale said:
A tranny faggot tiktoker by the name of Scarlet Blossum has openly declared war on republicans and has publicly stated that he will kill any that he interacts with irl.


I tried to ghost archive it but it’s not working.

View attachment 6884143

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@scarletblossum

View attachment 6884151

He deleted his IG but here’s his YouTube channel. Latest video is 3 years old.

Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: I'm a Silly, Critical Raxx Theory, Wünderkind and 6 others
Yours Truly 2095 said:
A lot of people say gender instead of sex because sex is more "lewd" to say out loud. It's often not conscious. Most people aren't aware of the history of the term gender and simply view it the same as sex. Gender is only this idea other than your biology to weirdos. To everyone else they're interchangeable terms much to the dismay of said weirdos.
Click to expand...
Thank you. I have noticed this problem for awhile now too, the average person using the concept of gender in place of objective sex is like nails on a chalkboard. But how do you blame them when they aren't told it's origin, considering it's been censored for so long? When someone of political opposition to gender-ideology uses this term it's like witnessing them stepping into a beartrap they setup and it only reinforces these trans ideals onto the average person when it's looked into on surface level. If all people stop using this word inappropriately, altogether these rainbowtards will have nothing to sink their teeth into during an argument over objective reality.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: Colon capital V, beautiful person, I'm a Silly and 3 others
10TH Kiwi said:
Thank you. I have noticed this problem for awhile now too, the average person using the concept of gender in place of objective sex is like nails on a chalkboard. But how do you blame them when they aren't told it's origin, considering it's been censored for so long? When someone of political opposition to gender-ideology uses this term it's like witnessing them stepping into a beartrap they setup and it only reinforces these trans ideals onto the average person when it's looked into on surface level. If all people stop using this word inappropriately, altogether these rainbowtards will have nothing to sink their teeth into during an argument over objective reality.
Click to expand...
I think the average normie so deeply thinks that gender is just a less lewd way of saying the word sex that it's why much of this shit is back firing. They've been trying and failing to reclaim the word gender. When you have someone trying to tell them "ACTHUALLY WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO AS GENDER IS REALLY SEX" those people come across unhinged or at best annoying. If you're arguing with someone about objective reality you're never going to win.

The best bet is to make them clown out in public and be as insufferable as possible. I haven't thought about this a lot, but in my estimation if someone is already under the "Gender actually is x y z and you mean sex" then they're already gone. For anyone else you risk alienating them by trying to correctism them into not saying gender anymore and instead saying sex. I say, continue making gender mean what GENITALS you have, it's sex but less lewd to say. You don't alienate normies who just think that's what it means already, and you make other clowns show themselves and be insufferable. Language policing only backfires. Let it backfire on them. I'd be interested more in what your viewpoint is, I just think to the average person gender=genitals and anyone trying to tell them differently comes across as a loon.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: stares at error messages, Colon capital V, Wright and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back