"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

this is just completely false. it's actually so false I'll so far as to say that black rednecks are actually tolerable.
There’s definitely some Uncle Ruckus type black rednecks out there. I saw a clip of some black YouTubers going to a very southern fair with confederate flags everywhere. They saw an older black guy and asked him if he was offended by the flag. He said “what is there to be offended by?” The YouTubers were shocked lmao
 
It may be worth it. They've been disconnected from the culture for a while, but Amish share a similar cheesemaking culture with the Swiss and Alsatians, centuries old, so they'd probably do a good job.

I'd always be suspicious of brand names like "Amish Country" though because they aren't necessarily Amish.
I was more so talking about a brand I saw in stores. There are also multiple farmers markers near me that I've seen various people sell cheese before.
 
But I have known just as many white people that fit the descriptions people would give black people. As I've known black people like that.
I didn't claim that.
> I've known just as many terrible white people as black people
< Oh, so black people are dramatically overrepresented among terrible people?
> Um. No. That's just like. My lived experience. Man.

If your experience isn't supposed to be representative of society, why are you bringing it up? Or are we playing language lawyer and nitpicking that "just as many" technically doesn't mean it's not 4x more? I get not wanting to make generalizations based on your own experience, but it doesn't really work when your own experience is what you offer to a discussion about general populations.

But even so, it is true, you didn't directly claim that. The implication of what you did claim is, rather, that even if every white became a perfect saint overnight, prollyanotherlurker's social surroundings would only be at most half-fixed. We may suppose that he believes it would be a more complete solution for the rest of us, and he wouldn't want us to lower ourselves merely to help him in particular, God bless his soul.
 
View attachment 7457465
sorry to learn about your recent eviction after you were exposed by card pooster for being a brony, hope you're in a better space now jawsh
This reminded me of an old video of a disgusting hoarder apartment, and they had a Human Rights Campaign sticker on the front door. Maybe it wasn't just a hoarder apartment, maybe it was bodycam footage of a CP bust as well? I wish I could find it.
 
View attachment 7457465
sorry to learn about your recent eviction after you were exposed by card pooster for being a brony, hope you're in a better space now jawsh
I am entranced. Can she sue for this? I dont think she'll get anything out of it come to think of it but wow. Uh. My question is, did they trash it out of spite of being evicted or was it just....always like that? I dont think it was actually. There is too much work done on too many random areas like walls and ceilings, even floors to want it to be that trashed. These people really DO exist outside the Internet. Fascinating.
 
Just saw this on X and thought it was kind of funny.
1.webp2.webp3.webp
Specifically, this bit:
Furries lol.webp

Looks like you and the furries are now brothers in arms, Null. The payment processors are going after them too.
 
Last edited:
Just saw this on X and thought it was kind of funny.
View attachment 7549811View attachment 7549812View attachment 7549813
Specifically, this bit:
View attachment 7549814

Looks like you and the furries are now brothers in arms, Null. The payment processors are going after them too.
just beat me too it & ninjed me to post another payment processor getting hit by NSFW wave.
you know line there consequences for not pushing for banking reform & patriot act reform.
now furry & anime/manga/japan are in same box of NSFW. ( high risk)
only way out will be lawsuit against banks or congress good luck.
1750779143161.webp
1750779228293.webp

next ship & sacrifice has been found
1750779337225.webp
1750779489740.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: I'm a Silly
Banks are not payment processors.
true & correct
due to this thin distinction.
most likely need a lawsuit to end the distinction & be considered a payment process.
congress fix the payment process again :optimistic:
Banks and payment processors often work together. A bank may provide the merchant account (the account that receives the funds), while the payment processor handles the actual transaction processing. The payment processor then settles the funds with the bank.
While banks provide financial services related to payments, they are generally not considered payment processors. Banks may partner with or provide the underlying infrastructure for payment processors. Payment processors are specialized third-party companies that handle the technical and logistical aspects of processing electronic payments.
 
The abundance of America I've known is gone. There are food deserts, a distinct lack of quality in absolutely everything, there are far fewer "made in america" products than there were "made in eu / made in [germany/poland/sweden]" products
It is almost to fully impossible to get anything that is fully manufactured in the states now. We have sold and shipped off the capability and knowledge overseas, mainly to China. Here is a far more eloquent and smarter guy than I explain the challenges of that with his journey of making a simple grill brush that's "made in America".
I always had an idea that this was kinda the case but I had no clue how dire it was. It is genuinely heartbreaking to me that we've let us be put into a situation where we can't even figure out how to make the plastic trite we've drowned ourselves in for the sake of convenience and more trite. I say we because I was 100% one of those people and benefited from it.
 
trump has saved golden cow of AI.

LLMs can hoover up data from books, judge rules

Anthropic scores a qualified victory in fair use case, but got slapped for using over 7 million pirated copies
iconIain Thomson
Tue 24 Jun 2025 // 19:52 UTC
One of the most tech-savvy judges in the US has ruled that Anthropic is within its rights to scan purchased books to train its Claude AI model, but that pirating content is legally out of bounds.

In training its model, Anthropic bought millions of books, many second-hand, then cut them up and digitized the content. It also downloaded over 7 million pirated books from Books3 dataset, Library Genesis (Libgen), and the Pirate Library Mirror (PiLiMi), and that was the sticking point for Judge William Alsup of California's Northern District court.

On Monday, he ruled that simply digitizing a print copy counted as fair use under current US law, as there was no duplication of the copyrighted work since the printed pages were destroyed after they were scanned. However, Anthropic may have to face trial over the use of pirated material.

"As Anthropic trained successive LLMs, it became convinced that using books was the most cost-effective means to achieve a world-class LLM," Alsup wrote [PDF] in Monday's ruling. "During this time, however, Anthropic became 'not so gung ho about' training on pirated books 'for legal reasons.' It kept them anyway."

Anthropic became 'not so gung ho about' training on pirated books 'for legal reasons.'
The case was filed by three authors - Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson - who claimed that Anthropic illegally used their fiction and non-fiction works to train Claude. At least two of each author's books were included in the pirated material used by Anthropic.

Alsup noted that Anthropic hired the former head of partnerships at Google’s book-scanning project, Tom Turvey, who began conversations with publishers about licensing content, as other AI developers have done. But these talks were abandoned in favor of simply buying millions of books, taking the pages out, and scanning them, which the judge ruled was fair use.

"We are pleased that the Court recognized that using 'works to train LLMs was transformative — spectacularly so,'" an Anthropic spokesperson told The Register.

"Consistent with copyright’s purpose in enabling creativity and fostering scientific progress, Anthropic's LLMs trained upon works not to race ahead and replicate or supplant them — but to turn a hard corner and create something different."

On the matter of piracy, however, Alsup noted that in January or February 2021, Anthropic cofounder Ben Mann "downloaded Books3, an online library of 196,640 books that he knew had been assembled from unauthorized copies of copyrighted books — that is, pirated." In June, he downloaded "at least five million copies of books" from Libgen, and in July 2022, another two million copies were downloaded from PiLiMi, both of which Alsup classified as "pirate libraries."
Alsup found that the pirated works weren't necessarily used to train Claude, but that the company had retained them. That could prove legally problematic for the startup, Alsup ruled, since they were kept for "Anthropic’s pocketbook and convenience," he found.

"This order grants summary judgment for Anthropic that the training use was a fair use. And, it grants that the print-to-digital format change was a fair use for a different reason," he wrote.

"But it denies summary judgment for Anthropic that the pirated library copies must be treated as training copies. We will have a trial on the pirated copies used to create Anthropic’s central library and the resulting damages, actual or statutory (including for willfulness). That Anthropic later bought a copy of a book it earlier stole off the internet will not absolve it of liability for the theft but it may affect the extent of statutory damages."

Alsup's ruling is mixed news for Anthropic, but he does know his onions. For the last quarter of a century, Alsup has presided over some of the biggest tech trials in history, and his rulings have been backed up by the Supreme Court in some cases.

Alsup, a coder for over two decades (primarily in BASIC), presided over the Oracle-Google trial over fair use of Java code in Android, which led him to dabbling in that language. More recently, he sentenced former Google self-driving car engineer Anthony Levandowski to 18 months in prison for stealing proprietary info from his work at Google and bringing it to a new startup, Otto, which he later sold to Uber. President Trump later commuted the sentence in 2021.

Bartz and Johnson had no comment at the time of going to press. Graeber declined to discuss the verdict. ®
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back