"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Found Null's secret sloptube channel.
7567567567876878678678.webp
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: donjulio, murph, Guyspleasedontfight and 12 others
Null said:
is the joke that british anguish is pornographic?
Click to expand...
I assumed that "messing up the Internet" was referring to the recent push to require ID verification for pornographic content, in order to safeguard minors from porn.
The joke is that only coomers would care about porn websites being gated behind ID verification.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Guyspleasedontfight, I'm a Silly, Retink Retunk and 1 other person
Post Reply said:
He lives in fear of the day when his driver's license is posted beside his Kiwi Farms handle.
Click to expand...
Thankfully the k-farms is an independent website and not a trillion dollar boring as fuck walled garden like Facebook or Discord therefore unless the Internet as we know or fundamentally changes we won't need to scan our eyeballs or testicles to send to dear feeder.

People can just run their own forums and Mumble servers and the like and stop being dependent on Discord.

One thing that is interesting though is that this whole thing will push more people to be comfortable with scanning their eyeballs for worldcoin (owned by Sam Altman).
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Guyspleasedontfight, Robotic Kiwi, I'm a Silly and 3 others
NuII's Clitty💦 said:
I assumed that "messing up the Internet" was referring to the recent push to require ID verification for pornographic content, in order to safeguard minors from porn.
The joke is that only coomers would care about porn websites being gated behind ID verification.
Click to expand...
I thought you were just claiming the Br*tish have a humiliation fetish and the poster was a Br*t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guyspleasedontfight
I'm not sure quite where to put this on k-farms but considering the face/ID scan shit for Discord/Spotify/YouTube has mainly been concentrated here, I will share it here and its called something like "zkproof KYC"
It's an idea that has kind of been around since the mid 80s in one form or another but AFAIK hasn't been implemented fully anywhere just yet - it is one of those sort of science fiction/future ideas. It kind of enables you to prove something (such as a scan of your face) "happened" but doesn't require the data itself. There's a lot of money flowing into this idea currently already and its definitely "within the realm of possibility" of actually being deployed at a wide scale very, very soon.

1754058439037.webp
1754058505143.webp
1754059212461.webp

I can't really TLDR it in an easy way for retards to understand given how technically complex it is and also given how there are different ideas about how it would work, so if you're interested take a gander through those links to get an idea of what it is. Consneedering this whole face/eyeball scanning shit is becoming a hot talking point it may benefit many of the people reading here to at least be aware of it so they can be smarter than the average retard discussing this stuff on the internet.

It basically removes the requirement for dubious 3rd party providers like Discord, Twitter and others to actually see you or your identity documents.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Jershua Coomer Troon, Guyspleasedontfight, I'm a Silly and 1 other person
neger psykolog said:
Consneedering this whole face/eyeball scanning shit is becoming a hot talking point it may benefit many of the people reading here to at least be aware of it so they can be smarter than the average retard discussing this stuff on the internet.
Click to expand...
Zero-knowledge proofs are very interesting from a technical perspective, but from a social perspective, remember that the reason the government is pushing for this is that the giving up of your identity is a feature, not a bug of the system. The UK occupation government doesn't actually want to protect kids (see: everything they've ever done) by proving people's age, they want to force twitter to hand of the legal identification papers of @chudBloke91 who posted "Not a fan of kids being torture raped by Pakis tbh", so that sending him to be killed by a muslim prison gang is a bit less work.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: deadtofaunus, WrenchWring, I'm a Silly and 1 other person
Bloom Worm Cross Field said:
Zero-knowledge proofs are very interesting from a technical perspective, but from a social perspective, remember that the reason the government is pushing for this is that the giving up of your identity is a feature, not a bug of the system. The UK occupation government doesn't actually want to protect kids (see: everything they've ever done) by proving people's age, they want to force twitter to hand of the legal identification papers of @chudBloke91 who posted "Not a fan of kids being torture raped by Pakis tbh", so that sending him to be killed by a muslim prison gang is a bit less work.
Click to expand...
Not really. This is mostly all happening because every major social media platform was allowing advertising to kids, grooming shit and basically doing next to no moderation for years.

For sure there is a somewhat concerted and organized push from the government side to clamp down on YouTube and other services and enforce internet ID bullshit but the services themselves putting up face scan nigger shit is an effort to try and stop the government(s) anally raping them.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: I'm a Silly
neger psykolog said:
It kind of enables you to prove something (such as a scan of your face) "happened" but doesn't require the data itself.
Click to expand...
Presuming that KYC is capable of a zero knowledge proof (which I find to be unlikely, in large part because any kind of KYC is the opposite of NP hard, everyone knows the solution in advance and the difficult part is finding out whether the solution is truthful, or in other words, if Kiwifarms.net gives the user a prompt asking "are you 18 or older", everyone knows the solution is yes, but it's very difficult to verify that the user is telling the truth) there are two big problems with this. 1 it's unlikely that you can actually get people to trust the science that it serves as proof, and in fact it's very unlikely that anyone will understand the algorithms well enough to have a rational belief that it can actually prove that someone is 18 or older and that the proof remains valid under a zero knowledge scenario. 2 they actually want the data, as is proven by the Tea app leak, since Tea promised to delete ID photos after they are verified (since Tea was literally made by a faggot it's likely he actually wanted people to find the public bucket).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back