"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

1754103353249.webp
First they came for the cheddar, and I did not stand up because the cheddar chuds need to understand the pain of limburgercels <--- YOU ARE HERE
 
Im currently watching an old MATI where Josh goes over the Finnster shit that happened last year, and I just want to remind everyone that PKA is full of tranny chasers. And if they offer Josh a guest spot on their podcast, he should decline it immediately
I'm convinced PKA is the worst podcast in recorded human history.
The astral level of dogshit they've achieved is so miraculous it could convert nations to Christianity.
 
Im currently watching an old MATI where Josh goes over the Finnster shit that happened last year, and I just want to remind everyone that PKA is full of tranny chasers. And if they offer Josh a guest spot on their podcast, he should decline it immediately
They're also retarded media simps. Kyle, the guy who was all about guns, proceeded to condemn Kyle Rittenhouse quoting multiple fake media talking points like him crossing state lines with a gun to kill black people. You'd think of all people he'd at least look into it slightly before he repeated everything blindly.
 
I feel like part of the reason I'm extra mad about the ID shit. Is this.


Post in thread 'The Linux Thread' https://kiwifarms.net/threads/the-linux-thread.62944/post-22106679

Brian Lunduke made this earlier this week. For context he was already pushing for people to get behind everything requiring ID. All social media. Because he doesn't like that anonymous people can troll him.

Then like the KIKE he is he just keeps pushing the idea. "Hey fellow chuds you want to stop the heckin dead Internet theory?", and yet again he is saying we should be forced to use ID for everything.

Supposed I hate it. I hate that people like him will say it's a good thing. And people will believe him. Thankfully most of the comment section was calling him a lying Jew. And saying it was a shit take. But that wasn't everyone there.
 
Im currently watching an old MATI where Josh goes over the Finnster shit that happened last year, and I just want to remind everyone that PKA is full of tranny chasers. And if they offer Josh a guest spot on their podcast, he should decline it immediately
They're very good friends with Dick Masterson, so I doubt they would ask him unless it's for the grift.
In which case they absolutely would and just not bring it up at all
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mrfresh
Can someone link the thread where null lays out what to say to the senators about internet freedom? I’ve got a long section about anti immigration l written out for my emails already but little for the internet freedom. I know the big problem is the penalty is weak and not actionable but I want to see what he wrote as a solution.
First he wrote this: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/s-401-fair-access-to-banking-act.224421/
Then someone came in with this: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/s-401-fair-access-to-banking-act.224421/post-22043852
Later, the first USIPS blog post: https://usips.org/blog/2025/07/fair-access-to-banking/
And finally, the despair about it during MATI.
 
@Null - you can use Xcancel to browse X without being logged in and you can even see replies. Just substitute "x.com" with "xcancel.com" and voila.

I use Redirector for Firefox to automatically redirect any x.com or twitter.com URL to xcancel.com. Just set it up like in the attached screenshot because it may not be obvious at first.
 

Attachments

  • xcancel.webp
    xcancel.webp
    450.1 KB · Views: 55
  • redirector.webp
    redirector.webp
    65.8 KB · Views: 53
NP literally means a problem which can be easily checked, NP hard is an NP problem without a polynomial time solution algorithm (most importantly the cryptography solutions we use are NP hard). In other words, although it might seem like it, NP does not mean non-polynomial but non-deterministic polynomial time.
NP and P are both sets: a problem is either in P or not in P, and they are either in NP or not in NP.

If a problem is in P, it doesn't really get a special name, and it's also automatically in NP.
If a problem is in NP but not in P, it is NP-complete.
If a problem is in neither, it is NP-hard.

I think you're confusing NP-hard for NP-complete.


Concerning the "last man out turn off the lights" idea for white Europeans mentioned during the superchats, I nominate "last man out of Sodom" for an alternative name. I'm a bit mixed on the idea itself - even white refugees can shit up their new home pretty well, as everyone familiar with the Californian exodus can confirm. There's also the point that it would drain quality people from whatever effective resistance would have otherwise been possible.

Unless we go full "Bay of Pigs" at some point, hopefully with better results. It wouldn't surprise me if the current UK has less military capability than the Cuba of that time.
 
Back