"if I hate it, it sucks, is stupid and will fail."
Fail? I don't really know how it's a failure. I have lower prices on singles, because whales like you keep cooking up excuses to throw mortgage payments at intentionally-overpriced slop.
Seriously, ever since Collector boosters were first introduced back in... what was it, Throne of Eldraine? The price of most singles has cratered because gambling addicts subsidize the prices of non-special-edition prints.
Final Fantasy play boxes are still $70 over prerelease prices.
Using prerelease prices on a product without MSRP definitely couldn't possibly go wrong.
On June 13th, broader release, we're looking at a price-point of about $195. The high of $240/box looks to have been a cresting point, and it's resting now around $220, an increase of $25. Talk to any owner, and it's because distribution of the stuff gets snapped up as quickly as it rolls out.
And yet the price-point for these boxes is about in tune with where
Lord of the Rings went to. Maybe these average out to the same, maybe FF grows to be the more expensive of the pair. Yet when we look at the prices of singles...
these are pretty normal distributions.
Meaning that the increased price of product has been eagerly consumed by whales opening lots of it. So, hey, thanks for doing your part to keep my single prices low. Draft prices on FF were higher than a 'normal' set, and yet in-line with LotR, Modern Horizons, and other supplementary-"premium" sets. In fact,
Final Fantasy seems to have the same price-point as MH3.
The one change is that FF is a standard-legal set. But, again, if you think you build competitive decks by cracking packs, you're fundamentally just fishing for excuses for a gambling addiction.
(And who the fuck plays paper standard outside of a PTQ or PT?)
WotC could easily fix this problem by increasing supply, or fixing their distribution issues.
Or you could keep paying inflated prices for shit you don't need, and I'll continue to get everything I want out of a set for like $30.