- Joined
- Apr 2, 2019
Ixalan was originally just the Pirate, Dinosaurs, and Mesoamerica plane. Too top heavy, instead of being the Multiverse explored through the lens of Pirates, Dinosaurs, and Mesoamerica it's asking the question 'How do we get Pirate, Dinosaurs, and Mesoamerica into MTG.' but I think it could've carved out it's own identity into MTG better if given more time during Lost Caverns if they had more time, but 1 set blocks just aren't long enough to get really acquainted with a plane.Ixalan was cool though.
Just compare Ixalan to Kaladesh which is Magic's India plane, but still recognizably has it's own identity. The same thing goes for Ravnica and Tarkier which are the Renaissance/Prauge plane and Steppe plane respectively.
Theroes and Innistrad also have the same problem, but to a lesser extant on their release, even if overtime I feel like those planes didn't successfully expound on their identities beyond the initial reference. Kamigawa is in there somewhere, but it probably got the worse approach taken to it where they just took a ledge hammer to the pre-existing setting to turn it into an even more referential plane with more contemporary references while also exploring an idea MTG had already explored within it's own framework in the form of Esper and Kaladesh being the 'Cyberpunk' planes.
