Crime Man with outstanding Warrant for Weapon Charges is killed by police during Traffic Stop. Riot brewing/commencing in minneapoli - Video / Warrant in post

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Mom calling for Peace: https://twitter.com/zerosum24/status/1381402255971250180?s=20

General Chaos: https://twitter.com/zerosum24/status/1381398695938297856?s=20

People threatening to go after police/their families: https://twitter.com/zerosum24/status/1381385411721883654?s=20



Accusation that the man that was starting Crap in the Iowa Capitol a few days ago was there starting crap after this officer involved shooting: https://twitter.com/zerosum24/status/1381404853986017288?s=20

1618191817641.png


1618191875237.png


EDIT WITH SOME RIOT FOOTAGE:



Roll the stream back and you can see looting

edit: https://twitter.com/zerosum24/status/1381450367767097348?s=20

little caesars being looted

edit2: https://twitter.com/zerosum24/status/1381455678582235136?s=20

Footlocker Justice!

Edit2 : National Guard Deployed

View attachment 2080200

National Guard on scene


Edit3 : Beauty Store Looted


1618203397188.png


Edit4: UNCONFIRMED...The cop that shot Daunte may have been female and
. 'the story happening' is that she thought she grabbed her taser but she grabbed her gun.

Edit5:
1618203845929.png
Tmobile

1618203909849.png

1618203922271.png

Dude is literally saying 'I work here bro. this crazy'
1618203942651.png
 
Last edited:
I mean the US media started a war over Cuba once, this is pretty fucking toned down in comparison
Toned down in terms of scale, sure. It's now fomenting a domestic conflict instead of fomenting an international incident. You'd think it becoming a domestic thing would actually make it more likely to get scrutiny though.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: KiwiFuzz
Toned down in terms of scale, sure. It's now fomenting a domestic conflict instead of fomenting an international incident. You'd think it becoming a domestic thing would actually make it more likely to get scrutiny though.
They did the same shit in the run up to the civil war. Hell they did the same shit in the run up to the revolutionary war too.
 
I am aware, I'm just very sensitive when I see positions laid out that lack details. They very often lack context and nuance that are minor but important. History degree, this shit matters, and very often "unimportant" details are left out because they don't serve whatever narrative is being constructed. The Why is very important.
There is enough information for anyone to look up the cases in detail.

If you're concerned that a lack of autistic amounts of data not being included in a forum post is false framing then you're mistaken.
Since you're trying to mind read, a common mistake intelligent people fall into, I'll set the record that no malicious intent is intended, and your vague concerns are noted.

If you would like to frame things differently go for it. That would take more effort than just replying your suspicious, but we all make sacrifices.

I'd never defend the honor of a police force, but I'm also not inclined to smear one just because.
If you haven't noticed the city is kind of a mess. Trust me when I say I didn't look them up "just because"
Statements like that make you sound like a biased contrarian. A pot calling the kettle black kind of moment
 
They did the same shit in the run up to the civil war. Hell they did the same shit in the run up to the revolutionary war too.
...Why the fuck is this the accepted state of affairs with the media, though?

That's what I don't understand. It's fucking weird to think that people want this shit around or don't care enough to go around Minecrafting the media. We're seeing people get really fucking angry and amped and doing insane shit and getting hurt, so it's not like there isn't a definite vested interest in keeping the media from being the equivalent of a serial arsonist.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: KiwiFuzz
There is enough information for anyone to look up the cases in detail.

If you're concerned that a lack of autistic amounts of data not being included in a forum post is false framing then you're mistaken.
Since you're trying to mind read, a common mistake intelligent people fall into, I'll set the record that no malicious intent is intended, and your vague concerns are noted.

If you would like to frame things differently go for it. That would take more effort than just replying your suspicious, but we all make sacrifices.


If you haven't noticed the city is kind of a mess. Trust me when I say I didn't look them up "just because"
Statements like that make you sound like a biased contrarian. A pot calling the kettle black kind of moment
Kay. Lets take one claim.

2013
In response to a call, Minneapolis police corner unarmed 22-year-old Black resident Terrance Franklin in a Lyn-Lake basement, shoot and kill him.

Phrased like this it leaves out this. Huh, you mean he was wanted for a questioning in a burglary case? And when the police found him it was in the basement of a house he broke into? No, you're right, the context doesn't matter.
 
...Why the fuck is this the accepted state of affairs with the media, though?

That's what I don't understand. It's fucking weird to think that people want this shit around or don't care enough to go around Minecrafting the media. We're seeing people get really fucking angry and amped and doing insane shit and getting hurt, so it's not like there isn't a definite vested interest in keeping the media from being the equivalent of a serial arsonist.
You’re responsible for your own actions and always are as I’ve stated before in this thread. Is the media an influence? Sure. But the reason this is tolerated is because that’s what the media is and always has been - a way to conduct information and news between people, written by people. State controlled media isn’t the answer either. Why are cases like this focused on? Because they demand attention. People are interested and the media follows up on it. The media isn’t an all knowing always correct entity, but when people are concerned about an issue the media provides more about that issue. That’s the feedback loop that’s always been in place. Consumer wants something and someone provides. This isn’t to say there haven’t been coordinated campaigns by the media before, but you’d be surprised how rare they are and how mixed the success is.

Also, don’t forget the cops will draw into silence whenever any incident occurs and generally shield their own. In a community that already distrusts cops, they want a media that distrusts cops even more. The cops feed stuff to the media and reporters dig in more on the story, and people then seize on any information they find to push whatever they want to believe. It’s a vicious cycle with no good answers, especially when the cops have a history of abuse and any statement they make becomes suspect. The community in say, Ferguson didn’t care what the truth was. They already knew the truth of their situation which was the cops were being in general giant pieces of shit. While Micheal Brown wasn’t innocent, the people around him in the community were fed the fuck up and expressed that. The media reports on what people are saying and as fast as they can because news sells and so on.

When you dig into the Fergusen PD you find a culture of racist and uncaring police who aren’t even trying to hide it among themselves and at higher levels. The media also reported on that but again, people seize on whatever media fuels their beliefs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CheezzyMach
...Why the fuck is this the accepted state of affairs with the media, though?

That's what I don't understand. It's fucking weird to think that people want this shit around or don't care enough to go around Minecrafting the media. We're seeing people get really fucking angry and amped and doing insane shit and getting hurt, so it's not like there isn't a definite vested interest in keeping the media from being the equivalent of a serial arsonist.
People have hated journalists ever since the profession existed. They got whacked all the time. Modern people just have a hugely disproportionate understanding of how hated they are nowadays because the post-WWII media environment was so utterly gatekept that they were able to proffer the idea that journalism was a noble profession unto three successive generations of Americans, and no one but crackpot 'zine editors could really dispute them. Outside of that bubble, they've been treated with mild contempt and had a reputation for raking muck to serve their own interests whenever it pleased them.

Hell, one of the first "journalists" in the USA, and an eventual founding father, routinely used self-submitted anonymous letters to the editor of his own paper to snipe at fellow Philadelphia socialites. You might have heard of him, he got his start as one Silence Dogood, and is famous for flying a kite in a thunderstorm.

And it's not like people universally accept the current state of affairs. Antifa targets journalists all the time for reporting on them, and the Rayshard Brooks riots in Atlanta burned a CNN headquarters. The ones who don't get hit too hard are the mouthpieces on the teevee whose narratives align pretty well with that of the elite power structure and are well-insulated because of it.
 
No, you're right, the context doesn't matter.
I did say a combination of drugs, alcohol, poverty and ghetto trash culture was a factor. I know you just want to pick a fight and not read anything I write except for cherry-picking.

You also didn't respond to what I wrote about the Somali cop shooting the Australian woman. Those cops claimed she startled them and pulled a weapon after banging on their vehicle. That was after none of her prints were found on their squad car and their body cams conveniently turned off. Since that case doesn't help you're narrative you ignored it.

You've got a combination of cases with the cops exercising poor decision-making under fire.

I don't support the protestors burning the city down or the BLM narrative, but I believe something is up with that city other than mean Democrats picking on poor honest cops.

I'm sorry, but you're trying to make this into something it isn't. I'm seeing this turning into a circle jerk and there is nothing sadder to read on a forum.
 
1934
Minneapolis police open fire downtown during the Minneapolis General Strike and kill two workers on Bloody Friday. Downtown business interests later invent Aquatennial to overshadow the annual “Teamster Picnics” celebrating the successful strike.
No mention that the strike was organized by the Communist Bill Dunne and his brothers who armed the 'strikers' with bats and pipes.
No mention that the Teamsters Local Union 574 was controlled by Trotskyists.
No mention that the goal of the strikes was to turn all of the trucking companies into closed-shops.
No mention that the strikers hospitalized 30 cops and killed two CA members in May of that same year.

Just more 'right side of history', 'dindu nuffin' faggotry that marxists routinely engage in. When they beat and kill your people, it's just the bourgeoisie getting their just desserts. When you beat and kill them, they were just poor, unarmed, mostly peaceful protesters who just wanted good things for 'the workers.'

 
I did say a combination of drugs, alcohol, poverty and ghetto trash culture was a factor. I know you just want to pick a fight and not read anything I write except for cherry-picking.
Pointing out that the way it's written implies that the cops backed an innocent man into a corner, as opposed to finding a man suspected of burglary in a place he isn't supposed to be, with the potential that he lunged for their weapons and injured two of them isn't cherry picking.

You also didn't respond to what I wrote about the Somali cop shooting the Australian woman. Those cops claimed she startled them and pulled a weapon after banging on their vehicle. That was after none of her prints were found on their squad car and their body cams conveniently turned off. Since that case doesn't help you're narrative you ignored it.
Yes, the Somali they, for some reason, let on the police force freaked out and shot a woman. Not sure what your point is, I'm familiar with case. The way it was on that list left out all context, it could easily be seen as the cops just shot her for no reason and put there because she was white, so see, you're including white people in the list too.

You've got a combination of cases with the cops exercising poor decision-making under fire.

I don't support the protestors burning the city down or the BLM narrative, but I believe something is up with that city other than mean Democrats picking on poor honest cops.

I'm sorry, but you're trying to make this into something it isn't. I'm seeing this turning into a circle jerk and there is nothing sadder to read on a forum.
You're getting awfully defensive here, why is that?
 
No mention that the strike was organized by the Communist Bill Dunne and his brothers who armed the 'strikers' with bats and pipes.
No mention that the Teamsters Local Union 574 was controlled by Trotskyists.
No mention that the goal of the strikes was to turn all of the trucking companies into closed-shops.
No mention that the strikers hospitalized 30 cops and killed two CA members in May of that same year.

Just more 'right side of history', 'dindu nuffin' faggotry that marxists routinely engage in. When they beat and kill your people, it's just the bourgeoisie getting their just desserts. When you beat and kill them, they were just poor, unarmed, mostly peaceful protesters who just wanted good things for 'the workers.'

“Gee, maybe we should just let the police beat us with impunity.”

Communists aren’t always wrong. Capitalists aren’t always right. Trotskyites can be pretty based as they make stalinists reee without any effort at all. The guy who wrote “this land is my land” was a dyed in the wool red, and based as fuck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CheezzyMach
“Gee, maybe we should just let the police beat us with impunity.”
Holy false choice, Batman!
Communists aren’t always wrong.
That's where you're wrong, kiddo.
Capitalists aren’t always right.
Capitalism is a marxist meme.
Trotskyites can be pretty based as they make stalinists reee without any effort at all.
*chuckles in icepick*
The guy who wrote “this land is my land” was a died in the wool red, and based as fuck.
Woody Guthrie was a Stalin apologist, and an advocate for the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. He can get fucked along with all of the rest of the pinko 'artistes.'
 
Holy false choice, Batman!

That's where you're wrong, kiddo.

Capitalism is a marxist meme.

*chuckles in icepick*

Woody Guthrie was a Stalin apologist, and an advocate for the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. He can get fucked along with all of the rest of the pinko 'artistes.'
>capitalism is a Marxist meme
Holy fuck my sides you’re really that stupid?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CheezzyMach
>capitalism is a Marxist meme
Holy fuck my sides you’re really that stupid?
Only that I was stupid enough to read all three volumes of Das Kapital.
Do you have an actual objection that categorization? Or do you just need to change out your tampon and have some ice cream?
 
  • Like
Reactions: los pepes
No mention that the Teamsters Local Union 574 was controlled by Trotskyists.
If you clicked on the link text Minneapolis General Strike it would take you to the Wikipedia page. People are then free to look up the information linked in that as well.

Clipboard Image (2).jpg


People are free to click the hyperlinks. I'm not going to spoon-feed you retards and publish a book on a Kiwi Farms forum. You guys are starting to sound like Reddit users looking for an excuse to be outraged.
 
Only that I was stupid enough to read all three volumes of Das Kapital.
Do you have an actual objection that categorization? Or do you just need to change out your tampon and have some ice cream?
Because it isn't a marxist meme, the term originated far earlier. But that would require you to have a functional brain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CheezzyMach
I have powerleveled about this before:

I have a friend who is a salaried journalist with a reputable mainstream paper. He's not a soyboy or a pussy of any stripe. He's tall and skinny white trash ripped. He's also got a very large penis.

He and several of his colleagues covered the riots in the downtown of a major city last year. During the riot, one of his colleagues had his camera stolen and another was violently shoved and broke his hand in the fall. My friend had a guy flash a gun at him in a threatening manner. This news team witnessed numerous instances of vandalism and looting.

When they got back to the news room, the powers that be told him in no uncertain terms that he was not to write about any violence or vandalism that he had seen, so a full-on riot that he had witnessed magically became a "mostly peaceful protest" to the readership. All those windows downtown broke themselves overnight, dontcha know?

And this is from a guy who was in the thick of it with no guards. Even Mercado has a guard now. The TV assholes (who my friend says are dumb and slutty and he's smart and slutty so he should know) don't go to the really dangerous areas and they still have guards because they get their shit stolen all the time.

My point in saying this is that the lugenpresse is doing this intentionally and it's coming from people higher up than the people reporting from the street.
 
Back