Infected MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
This Kiddiephile account is a strange one, troll or not.

1576430691532.png

1576430635380.png


1576430781798.png


A MAP science team may happen in the future.
1576430905616.png


This one comes from Curious Cat

1576431060982.png

 
It still baffles me that pedos can so blanantly expouse thier views on such a public and widely used platform, truly it boggles the mind, its not the first time they've tried to organise as a politcal movement though, of course you got NAMBLA in the US but there was also a UK eqivalent that amazingly got taken semi seriously way back in the 70s, the sick bastards even tired to get the lowering of the age of consent debated in Parliment.
 
Also got away with making millions off of a CP magazine called lolita which got shut down seventeen years after being created. Maybe all these MAPs should haul ass to the netherlands

I started reading about Joop Wilhelmus, related to the two posts I'm quoting above and below. The discussion happened in October(~8 pages back) so as a refresher he was a Dutch pornographer that started a childporn magazine called lolita in in 1970 - the timing of that coincides with the sexual liberation of children in the west. On Wikipedia it mentions that his sales manager, for Jool's of-legal-age porn magazine, was a guy named Jan Wenderhold but he didn't have an article, I'll get back to him.

How the magazine worked, he encouraged abusers to photograph the children they were abusing(daughters comes to mind) and send it in WHILE ALSO running classifieds to let these people come into contact with each other and money if he could get involved. The mind boggles.
From wikipedia said:
Lolita was first published circa 1970. Besides pornography it also featured a contact service for its readers through classified ads. [Jool] Wilhelmus encouraged readers to provide new child pornography images so as to ensure his magazine's survival. A gift magazine was given in exchange for each new child photograph, and the sum of $350 was offered in the magazine if Wilhelmus could take the photographs himself.

Next part of the story
In 1986, the PSI subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs called Lolita "the most notorious of the foreign commercial child pornography publications". The magazine reached issue 55 in 1984, and was eventually closed down by Dutch authorities in 1987, seventeen years after its conception.

It ran for 17 years. Wasn't Seventeen also a dutch porn magazine with a really shady history of featuring minors... Yes it was.
Googling it(a tough search query to formulate) lead me to the "history" page of their now legal website, so it's straight from the horses mouth and written by the founded Jan Wenderhold, mentioned above as being Jool Wilhelmus sales manager. Birds of a feather flock together.

Conception of the magazine:
I'm drinking a beer in the sports hall with my friends after playing a game of indoor football. Sitting next to us are some girls who also came to work out. One of the girls yells out to me 'Aren't you that guy that publishes sex magazines, like CHICK?”. I confirm that I am that guy, to which she replies “Why don't you create a fun sex magazine especially for young people?”. For a moment I didn't know what to say, but I asked her if there would be any demand for something like that. “Yes of course!” all the girls replied together. I asked how old they were. It turned out their average age was 17 years old.
Porn, for the kids, you know.

[Seventeen Magazine] begun to be published in 1975. Its name was reflecting the fact that the preferred models for the magazine were at seventeen years of age or sixteen at youngest. However, as it featured models who were minors as per the legislation of many countries, Seventeen faced difficulty in worldwide distribution.
...
In the late 90s, they initiated a process of change, featuring only models over 18 years of age, because they were informed, that the Netherlands were forced to raise the age to 18, because of a European law "harmonization".

Not anymore. CP has been banned since the 1980s, fortunately.

Look at the above, according to the pornographers itself it happened in the late 90's.


what the fuck is a non-contact offense? getting someone nude and looking at them? weird shit

Maybe paying boys a buck to piss down his pocket? (actual pedophile in Norway did that to hundreds of kids, "pocket man" he was called)
 
Not sure if this guy has been posted before on this site, but if not, let me introduce you to Kevin Rosa. While he claims not to be a pedophile, he has spent a substantial amount of time defending them and arguing for things such as the legalization of child molestation. He has apparently deleted many of his posts, though he still has a few pedo-related posts and I'm sure there are archives of it. He has over 1000 followers.
Kevin.jpg

(An image of himself that has since been deleted from his Twitter, cached by google)
kevinpedo1.PNG

Don't want to touch kids? Unfollow him right now!
kevin9.PNG

If you aren't supportive of pedophilia, you're either an idiot or uneducated!
View attachment 1066730
Worried about his pedo frens.
kevinpedo8.PNG

He's so happy that sane people unfollow him that he had to post about it!
kevinpedo2.PNG

He's totally not a pedophile, he's just *very* passionate about adult-child relationships. He's also a victim, had to throw that in there.
kevinpedo6.PNG

You're just hysterical if you doubt some obscure study.
kevinpedo7.PNG

kevinpedo5.PNG

Child marriage is bad! BUT ONLY BECAUSE ALL MARRIAGE IS BAD.
There's more out there and I assume a lot of it has been archived.
Here's his profile if anyone wants to dig deeper.
 

Attachments

  • kevinpedo3.PNG
    kevinpedo3.PNG
    174.7 KB · Views: 226
How the fuck are you suppose to be "Anti-contact" but then say you're attracted to kids. Twitter is the most infested fucking place on earth I swear.
Apparently just jerking off to child porn and not actually touching them makes them candidates for sainthood or something. They are the "good" pedophiles. As if. As they say, the only good pedophile is a dead one.
 
Apparently just jerking off to child porn and not actually touching them makes them candidates for sainthood or something. They are the "good" pedophiles. As if. As they say, the only good pedophile is a dead one.
Apparently so. When did this MAP community even spring up it needs to be dealt with.
Something about all these MAP people with like anime PFP's and everything makes me think that they literally cater to children which would make sense i guess.
 
Apparently so. When did this MAP community even spring up it needs to be dealt with.
Something about all these MAP people with like anime PFP's and everything makes me think that they literally cater to children which would make sense i guess.
I remember hearing they were a community on Tumblr back in 2010-2012, but it's not really a new concept.
nambla has been around since the 1970s for example.
 
https://www.nambla.org/ Still going today, I mean I knew it strung back far but not in such quantities.
And honestly i can't believe that a NAMBLA site still exists, and maintained at that
They still post on the website but couldn't be bothered to update it from that 2001 look? WEW
Anyway to avoid derailing too much, here's a MAP encouraging confused kids to interact with self identified pedophiles online:
maprage.PNG
 
They still post on the website but couldn't be bothered to update it from that 2001 look? WEW
Anyway to avoid derailing too much, here's a MAP encouraging confused kids to interact with self identified pedophiles online:
View attachment 1068494
1562211473363.png

This is absolutely brain sizzling retardation. Where are these kids parents? "Minor-MAP?"
What kind of damn meta is that.
 
View attachment 1068495
This is absolutely brain sizzling exceptionalism. Where are these kids parents? "Minor-MAP?"
What kind of damn meta is that.
I'm guessing it's mostly teenagers. Some are probably legit pedos and some are probably just confused/weirdos. Obviously the adult pedophiles are all over that, wanting to groom them for their own desires, or to encourage pedophilia in them.
As for parents, most of them are absolute shite when it comes to monitoring what their kids do online.
 
Back