Infected MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
2019-11-09.png

it's literally the same thing if you're attracted to a child that makes you a paedophile.
https://archive.li/uc5LN

2019-11-09 (1).png

https://archive.li/rENpk
 
View attachment 1003551
it's literally the same thing if you're attracted to a child that makes you a paedophile.
https://archive.li/uc5LN

View attachment 1003562
https://archive.li/rENpk
There's nothing wrong with being a serial killer.
Serial killers are still people.
Serial killers are still human and deserving of compassion.

There's nothing wrong with being a terrorist.
Terrorists are still people.
Terrorists are still human and deserving of compassion.

I could play this game all day long. Whoever posted this tweet is a fucking moron and a trash human being.
 
There's nothing wrong with being a serial killer.
Serial killers are still people.
Serial killers are still human and deserving of compassion.

There's nothing wrong with being a terrorist.
Terrorists are still people.
Terrorists are still human and deserving of compassion.

I could play this game all day long. Whoever posted this tweet is a fucking moron and a trash human being.
there's nothing wrong with being a rapist.
pedophiles are still human and deserved to be loved and respected.

everytime i read a tweet my from a MAP i get dumber and dumber.
 
Seems like the right place to post this. This took place in the Discord server for Project B, a Realm of the Mad God private server. Ban-happy and severely autistic.
View attachment 1019994
View attachment 1020009
View attachment 1019996

I long for the day when we can lynch these exceptional individuals publicly.
He could just have replaced half the paragraphs in that article with "Look, I haven't fucked any kids, yet. I just whack off to child pornography. Is that so wrong?" and the message and my view of him would have been the same.
 
It's the old "ethical pedophile" argument. Just imagine saying, I'm a serial killer guys. I fantasize about killing people all the time, but I would never, ever do it. Well, there was that one time I was pretty close, but I held it together and didn't strangle them and them slice them open and use their entrails as a jump rope. Look, just because I'd like to that to someone doesn't make me a bad person. You've chatted with me briefly on an internet forum. Did I seem like an evil person when I posted those cat videos? See, you can't judge me. I'm just like you.

My opinion is that if you have urges to do something, eventually you will give in. Just ask any fat person on a diet. Or Bill Cosby. Best of intentions don't mean shit. The fact that you even want to do something like that shows you are a very horrible person. It might not be your fault you turned out that way, but you still need to be put down like a rabid dog. For the benefit of society and also to end your own misery.
 
It's the old "ethical pedophile" argument. Just imagine saying, I'm a serial killer guys. I fantasize about killing people all the time, but I would never, ever do it. Well, there was that one time I was pretty close, but I held it together and didn't strangle them and them slice them open and use their entrails as a jump rope. Look, just because I'd like to that to someone doesn't make me a bad person. You've chatted with me briefly on an internet forum. Did I seem like an evil person when I posted those cat videos? See, you can't judge me. I'm just like you.

My opinion is that if you have urges to do something, eventually you will give in. Just ask any fat person on a diet. Or Bill Cosby. Best of intentions don't mean shit. The fact that you even want to do something like that shows you are a very horrible person. It might not be your fault you turned out that way, but you still need to be put down like a rabid dog. For the benefit of society and also to end your own misery.
I disagree slightly, why think alcoholics actually get and stay sober? It’s completely possible to have bad desires and not act on them but do that you cannot count on good intentions and/or internal strength. Everyone has weak moments and go trough bad times, there will be periods where you won’t have much fucks to give. Best way to make sure that you won’t do anything too bad is set your life that way can’t or doing so will be annoying. It’s seriously amazing how much good laziness can do but more importantly if you have to go trough extra steps most impulsive behavior will run out of steam. This why suicide prevention like making jumping from a bridge harder actually work pretty well. Many times people will have long periods of repeated antisocial/self harming thoughts but actual harmful actions tend to be very impulsive. You can’t control if you get impulses but you can set the situation where acting on them is harder.

I don’t know if pedofilia falls under this type of behavior though, many sexual related issues do not. If look something like serial killers, who often do get sexual pleasure from or mix sex with killing, they don’t do their actions impulsively. Maybe the first kill is impulsive but most following killing tend be thought out and don’t happen during great emotional pain or right after enormous stress.

I’m not saying that pedo behavior is like serial killers, nobody honestly knows because it’s badly studied area. There are definitely also impulsive sexual behavior like stupid hookups so it’s possible that pedo could fall under that too. Hell it could be that there few different patterns in pedos that need different approaches. There has be documented case of brain tumor causing pedofilia. No matter what the case is having se with kids is wrong and should not be tolerated. If a pedo can set themselves not have sex with kids even if they are going trough bad things, great! If not then society needs step in and make sure that pedos won’t have sex with kids, permanently.
 
The biggest issue in my opinion about pedophiles is opportunism. This includes the (more common if I'm not mistaken) non-choosy dudes who aren't pedos per se but will trick/bully a 4 year old into something sexual if they're alone with them long enough. I highly doubt (m)any of these fuckers are going to admit "yeah I'm into toddlers" so the best situation :optimistic: is that they recognize it could get them in a shitload of trouble and will make any excuse not to be alone with children.

Honestly it's like placing a giant bag of shards in front of a "former" meth addict and leaving the room. Could some resist? Yes probably, but it's still a horrible and unproductive idea.

The "no contact" pedos who look for excuses to hang out with kids and show love in non-sexual ways (spoiling them, taking them to theme parks, etc) actually creep me out far more than the actual admitted sex offenders and I know that makes no sense but it just skeeves me out on a level I can't even describe.
 
The "no contact" pedos who look for excuses to hang out with kids and show love in non-sexual ways (spoiling them, taking them to theme parks, etc) actually creep me out far more than the actual admitted sex offenders and I know that makes no sense but it just skeeves me out on a level I can't even describe.
I think that stems from an instinctual fear of the uncertain. You can't tell what's going on in that person's mind, but you know that they're sexually attracted to children and you only have their word that they haven't already acted on it, or will ever act on it. The constant window dressing and pseudo-moralizing the MAP movement doesn't help much at all considering it's about trying to get the public to let their guard down towards that uncertainty at the risk of children; it comes across as artificial and sinister.
 
. I highly doubt (m)any of these fuckers are going to admit "yeah I'm into toddlers" so the best situation :optimistic: is that they recognize it could get them in a shitload of trouble and will make any excuse not to be alone with children.

I knew a guy who confessed to pedophilic urges that he doesn't indulge in for the sole reason that it's illegal. This is quite horrifying, because it suggests that he derives morality from the law, rather than the law being derived from morality. That, or he would act on his urges but for the chance of getting caught. Last time I spoke to him, he said he was downloading CP (which he tried to offer to me). Upon questioning, he revealed that he was not using file encryption of any kind, nor a VPN (probably tor at best, which is nowhere near airtight). So I won't be surprised when I hear of him being arrested for possession.

Now that I think of it, if he held the law above all, he wouldn't be downloading cheese pizza either. So it must be only that he doesn't want to risk being caught. This means he may give in to his urges in the ideal situation.
 
i'll leave this here
View attachment 1022917


oh my god :story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story:
View attachment 1022920
according to this guy cp is art.
I like how they're straight-up saying that child abuse and all of the devastating psychological after effects of it is far less of an issue than pedophiles not getting wank material. In-fucking-credible.

E: okay, it's not quite where they're getting at, but the line gets blurrier by the day.
 
i'll leave this here
View attachment 1022917


oh my god :story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story: :story:
View attachment 1022920
according to this guy cp is art.
Fucking hell, does this pedo sped actually think that marketability = art?
There's a market for fucking McDonald's cheeseburgers, doesn't make them art. Porn can be artistic, but it isn't art by default.
More concerning is the fact that the sick fuck seems to see nothing wrong with ruining a child's life for the sake of his pedo fap fodder.

These people make me sick, and the people who defend them make me even sicker. The worst sort are the guys who screech about thought crime.
"But people have fantasies they'd never actually act on!"
So you fucking hope. Guaranteed that every child molester said something along those lines before at some point before raping a child.

Then you get the loli/shota art defenders who say "It's fine to jack it to pics of adults raping kids so long as it's a cartoon, because it's just a drawing and doesn't hurt anyone!"
Okay, let's use this "no harm no foul" logic against you. It wouldn't harm a child to be photographed nude in a bathtub. Still wrong and still (rightly) illegal. Why should pedo "art" be any different?
 
Back