Infected MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
2019-10-29 23.00.20.png

https://archive.li/bn2SU

Maps are very exceptional individuals they have no self awareness they don't understand why society hates them.
 
The Prostasia forum is a great outlet for some of the most exceptional of this crowd. Here's a weird thread that starts with a guy trying to define a distinction between MAPs (pedophiles) and.. other people who also are creepy and weird and want to have sex with kids, I guess? There are some really bizarre inclusions- a 'teleiophile' is a normal person who doesn't want to smash kids, which I suppose makes a 'Non-exclusive Teleiophile' someone who will fuck anything that moves.
1572596148876.png

Responses include the classic argument "But there are Japanese pornstars in their early 20s who, with a lot of makeup and maybe some plastic surgery, look 13. If I can jack off to them, why can't I jack off to 13 year olds?"
1572597476110.png
OP is confused. He's attracted to the pornstar, but she's a wrinkled 20 year old, so he isn't, like, really into it.
1572597580022.png

The rest of the thread is just plain confusing.

Meanwhile, the Prostasia organization itself is doing its best to preserve important freedoms... freedoms like the right for ten year old girls to practice erotic pole dancing, and presumably the rights of Prostasia donors to film them and upload the videos to YouTube.

If you think there's anything at all gross about sexualizing children in this manner, you must be some kind of repressed pedophile :story:
1572597841238.png

https://archive.is/gT4kK

Other than that, it's just business as usual, with these fine folks with only the best intentions working to advocate for teaching young children about consent as early as possible. They're breaking the mold. For example, would you think that the fetching young woman on the right below engages in ageplay? That's right, she regularly acts out the role of a four year old, albeit presumably one who has had a little too much sketti, as described in a piece that ends:
Meagan Ingerman said:
I writed for you a big, long, boring, grown-uppy, post that talks all about grown ups and grown up things and the silly things grown ups do. I’m too little to read something this grown-uppy, but if you’re a grown up who likes to be a grown up, you might like reading it. You might even like doing some of it. I’m not here to judge, I’m just here to chew gum and play with my stuffies…and I’m all outta gum.

1572598117049.png

https://archive.is/QFhMG
 
If we ever get to a place where pedophiles are tolerated or accepted the way that troons are, somebody needs to nuke this entire planet. There will be nothing left to save if we ever get to that level of degeneracy.
You can already be suspended on twitter for trolling them or telling them they’re disgusting.
 
MAPS deserve all the hate they get.
I see children not just my own even the ones of people I detest and think any sub human filth that would abuse them in any way deserves to spend the rest of their disgusting lives suffering greatly. I don't want death for the scum, they need to spend years suffering greatly and being made to work no matter how battered they are.
 
Did you find Protasia saying anything on the subject of kids like Desmond Napoles? The term "conservative scold" and the overall passive-aggressiveness of this is reminding me a lot of the exceptional defenders of that kid and his "mother" (i.e, blame-shifting everything on people they deem conservatives and homophobes instead of admitting their own faults, and whatnot)
 
View attachment 987694View attachment 987706

View attachment 987703
View attachment 987704

View attachment 987711
View attachment 987712
Autism, ADHD, dyscalculia and anxiety, all in one single package ? How do you produce kids that fucked-up ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICraveDeath
Autism, ADHD, dyscalculia and anxiety, all in one single package ? How do you produce kids that fucked-up ?
Give kids internet access to Dr. Google. I'd be willing to bet all of that was self diagnosed. Because if they are posting stuff like this, their parents aren't very involved or interested in what they are doing. I doubt those parents would invest the time to take them to the many specialists needed to get all of those diagnoses.
 
I wonder if these people who think kids can consent don't have some kind of development issue? Normal people and even a lot of child predators understand that kids don't understand sex and sexuality and aren't physically built or mentally ready for it. It also leaves permanent mental damage and has some pretty bad consequences on the person's future.
These people sound like NEETs with child brains who lack the ability to empathize and believe all people think like they do or are dumb in some way.
 
I wonder if these people who think kids can consent don't have some kind of development issue? Normal people and even a lot of child predators understand that kids don't understand sex and sexuality and aren't physically built or mentally ready for it. It also leaves permanent mental damage and has some pretty bad consequences on the person's future.
These people sound like NEETs with child brains who lack the ability to empathize and believe all people think like they do or are dumb in some way.
pedos are dumb they lack the brain capacity to understand that children don't understand the concept of sex and sexuality.even actual child predators can understand
that children can't consent to sex.

at the end of the day MAPS are dumb.

1572620755332.png

oh and speak of the devil.

when will maps learn that children cant consent to sex.kids don't understand the concept of sex and sexuality and aren't physically built for sex, and it also leaves permanent mental damage.
 
I sometimes look back on my childhood and remember it very fondly, and then wonder what would have happened if one of these kind of people came along and took that away. Then I remember at least most of these people were victims themselves. Their childhood innocence taken away and in its place is a mental scar that can never be healed.

Can't help but pity them, monsters create monsters after all.
 
For example, would you think that the fetching young woman on the right below engages in ageplay? That's right, she regularly acts out the role of a four year old, albeit presumably one who has had a little too much sketti, as described in a piece that ends:

Fun fact: she's dating the Prostasia founder. She's posted about childhood trauma, so I'm going to give her a break on the age-play, but not him for using her trauma response to get his rocks off.
 
I wonder if these people who think kids can consent don't have some kind of development issue? Normal people and even a lot of child predators understand that kids don't understand sex and sexuality and aren't physically built or mentally ready for it. It also leaves permanent mental damage and has some pretty bad consequences on the person's future.
These people sound like NEETs with child brains who lack the ability to empathize and believe all people think like they do or are dumb in some way.
Most of them have narc issues. They see children as objects of desire -- not partners. The talk about consent is how they rationalize to others that it is okay. They don't rationalize to themselves because they don't fucking care whether the kids consent or not. A pedophile gets off on the power and control over a victim who is helpless. Kids can also be manipulated easily. An adult woman or man would require force. A child can be conned into sexual acts. They get off on that.

I sometimes look back on my childhood and remember it very fondly, and then wonder what would have happened if one of these kind of people came along and took that away. Then I remember at least most of these people were victims themselves. Their childhood innocence taken away and in its place is a mental scar that can never be healed.

Can't help but pity them, monsters create monsters after all.
Not everyone who was molested becomes a monster. When they become adults, they have control over their own actions. They can seek mental health care if they have difficulty controlling their impulses. There is no excuse for them to continue the cycle of abuse. While I can feel sympathy for the child that they were, that sympathy does not apply to the adult who chooses to harm a child. The only way to stop the cycle is by ruthlessly taking these people out of society. My first choice would be execution, but I'd settle for life in prison (where it actually means life -- they stay in there until they die).
 
Did you find Protasia saying anything on the subject of kids like Desmond Napoles? The term "conservative scold" and the overall passive-aggressiveness of this is reminding me a lot of the exceptional defenders of that kid and his "mother" (i.e, blame-shifting everything on people they deem conservatives and homophobes instead of admitting their own faults, and whatnot)
I had a look actually even before posting that, and I don't think they've referred to drag kids or drag culture in general beyond that "In echoes of the furore over kids performing drag..." comment in that tweet. I don't think Des is Malcolm's cup of tea, at any rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kill all whales
I wonder if these people who think kids can consent don't have some kind of development issue? Normal people and even a lot of child predators understand that kids don't understand sex and sexuality and aren't physically built or mentally ready for it. It also leaves permanent mental damage and has some pretty bad consequences on the person's future.
These people sound like NEETs with child brains who lack the ability to empathize and believe all people think like they do or are dumb in some way.

I remember my Gaia Online days.. Yeah, God, that. and there was a thread about this very issue.. Well we didn't have the term no-MAP at the time but I'm convinced that they would identify as such today. There are people, young people, kids, who convince themselves that they can consent. That they know better than any law. That no matter what anyone tells them they are in a healthy consensual relationship with an adult man/woman. One person had an argument with me and insisted that their friend was perfectly safe and sane and had a consensual relationship. That girl was thirteen. Her abuser was in his forties but according to the other poster he was 'still hot'.

Pedos date kids on the sly, screw kids on the sly, convince them it's no big deal and they love them, that spreads to the kid's friends ect ect. It's gross.
 
I remember my Gaia Online days.. Yeah, God, that. and there was a thread about this very issue.. Well we didn't have the term no-MAP at the time but I'm convinced that they would identify as such today. There are people, young people, kids, who convince themselves that they can consent. That they know better than any law. That no matter what anyone tells them they are in a healthy consensual relationship with an adult man/woman. One person had an argument with me and insisted that their friend was perfectly safe and sane and had a consensual relationship. That girl was thirteen. Her abuser was in his forties but according to the other poster he was 'still hot'.

Pedos date kids on the sly, screw kids on the sly, convince them it's no big deal and they love them, that spreads to the kid's friends ect ect. It's gross.

I remember Gaia actually having to add rules against pedophile activism to their ToS at one point because it was such a rampant problem in certain boards. Pedos loved Gaia online because they were so lenient, and there were so many kids on there that they could go after.

Pedophile activism isn't new, but every few years it seems like these pedos come up with new acronyms and ways of targeting kids.

About 10 years ago, this trash was rampant on Blogspot, Livejournal, and the like. But many hosting companies and blog platforms then added explicit rules about disallowing pedophile activism in particular to their ToS policies. Pedophiles were then forced to back down and retreat into their communities and message boards, or risk being exposed and kicked off other platforms.

But now? People are so afraid of telling pedos to fuck off that they've practically given them the keys to the castle, so to speak.

Why the fuck can't Reddit, Twitter, Instagram, whatever, just stick one line in their ToS that says that it's against policy to advocate for sexual relationships between adults and children? That's what all of the other platforms did a decade ago, and it did a great job driving pedophiles back to their darkweb hellholes. To anyone who argues that we need the pedophiles posting out in the open because we can keep an eye on them? Why the fuck do you feel like the onus needs to be on the userbase to moderate fucking pedophiles? I see this argument on Reddit all the goddamn time- no, you do not need to keep an eye on pedophiles. Keeping them in the open on some of the most frequented platforms is straight-up dangerous to kids, because pedophiles are sick and will do anything to get their sexual kicks off kids, even if they call themselves "anti-contact". What the hell happened to the idea of keeping kids safe online?

I can assure you that some of these "pro-MAP minors" are legitimately kids. Maybe not most of them, but some of them definitely are. What's more, I'm willing to be many of them have probably been sexually abused, and this is their way of "taking control" over that abuse. It is scary to think about yourself as a helpless, defenseless little boy or girl being preyed on by an adult you were supposed to trust. But if you thought you had "agency", it gives a semblance of control to the victim. But it isn't real, and it comes with a host of horrible problems, skewed ideas of sexuality and healthy relationships, and not to mention you're cozying up with pedophiles. Now that pretty much all the safeguards are being removed to allow pedophiles on all platforms and be open about it, kids are going to be sexually abused more and more by these freaks.
 
About 10 years ago, this trash was rampant on Blogspot, Livejournal, and the like. But many hosting companies and blog platforms then added explicit rules about disallowing pedophile activism in particular to their ToS policies. Pedophiles were then forced to back down and retreat into their communities and message boards, or risk being exposed and kicked off other platforms.
U mad bro? U mad? Seriously though, I definitely recall Wikipedia having similar problems around the same time or earlier. Although the absolutely braindead 'solution' there was for a few of the autistic high-volume editors to be passive-aggressively obstructive until the open pedos broke arbitrary Wikipedia rules having nothing to do with the fact that they were advocating for child molestation, and could be banned for those rule violations rather than for the obvious reason.

Why the fuck can't Reddit, Twitter, Instagram, whatever, just stick one line in their ToS that says that it's against policy to advocate for sexual relationships between adults and children? That's what all of the other platforms did a decade ago, and it did a great job driving pedophiles back to their darkweb hellholes.
Because they don't want to pay any more moderators than they already do. Because they don't care. Because they especially don't care enough to deal with the bleating of pervert advocates when they censor stuff that they claim is borderline. Look at the somewhat similar case of site blocklists for objectionable materials. One claim the Prostasia organisation has made is that 'blocklists' intended to remove websites with CP present may include content that should not be included. I'm sorry, but I don't see the fact that graphic abortion photos and 'rapesection.com' are not available to schoolchildren as particularly problematic.

I mean, if you have classes in your school system that encourage children to engage in fornication, you certainly should show them abortion photos in class, but some would consider even that unreasonable. Meanwhile the advocates for keeping as wide a gray area as possible will just keep on fuzzing the rules as much as possible.
 
Back