Infected MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

[Pointless Pedant]

Also got away with making millions off of a CP magazine called lolita which got shut down seventeen years after being created. Maybe all these MAPs should haul ass to the netherlands

Not anymore. CP has been banned since the 1980s, fortunately.

 

[Aria]

Not anymore. CP has been banned since the 1980s, fortunately.

Thats good.

 

[HungoverHermaphrodite]

Let's be honest though, most of us went on porn sites when we were underage. Parents don't know what children are doing online and a lot of us would have been in deep shit if they did.

Yeah, porn addictions are pretty common with minors nowadays. Average age for starting to watch internet porn now(in the UK at least) is 9(too lazy to source so you're free not to believe me). My ex started at 8. Doesn't make it okay or mean you shouldn't be monitering your children's media. Deep shit or not, it's the right thing to do if you don't want your kid to grow up to have a tumblr level of dysfunction.

 

[Japs_eye]

Yeah, porn addictions are pretty common with minors nowadays. Average age for starting to watch internet porn now(in the UK at least) is 9(too lazy to source so you're free not to believe me). My ex started at 8. Doesn't make it okay or mean you shouldn't be monitering your children's media. Deep shit or not, it's the right thing to do if you don't want your kid to grow up to have a tumblr level of dysfunction.

I guess no monitoring of your children's internet habits could either lead someone to be a MAP on tumblr, or a KiwiFarms poster, pick your poison really

 

[Spastic Colon]

Yeah, porn addictions are pretty common with minors nowadays. Average age for starting to watch internet porn now(in the UK at least) is 9(too lazy to source so you're free not to believe me). My ex started at 8. Doesn't make it okay or mean you shouldn't be monitering your children's media. Deep shit or not, it's the right thing to do if you don't want your kid to grow up to have a tumblr level of dysfunction.

Monitoring your kids media is often harder than you think. Most parents are not tech savvy enough to set up a good system. Just using parental control software won't work because kids figure out pretty quickly how to get around that stuff. Keeping computers in an open area only works if you actually monitor them while they are on there. Most parents don't want to have to block out 2 hours (as if kids actually keep to the 2 hour recommended limit) of the day to sit and watch their kids go online.

Plus, it isn't just computers that need to be monitored now -- smart phones and other devices give access to the internet, too, so those have to be guarded appropriately. If your kid has a cell phone, that's lots of unsupervised opportunity to access stuff if you don't have it locked down appropriately.

You can still do every single thing right with your own electronic devices and let your kid hang out at a friend's house where their parents don't know how to do this or, worse, don't want to do it. My own daughter's first experience with porn was at age 9 when her best friend's house next door where the older teenage brother had left up screens of porn he had been viewing (which I suspect wasn't quite accidental, so she never played there again). So, then you've got to worry about restricting your kids to only hang out at your house and somehow not turn them into an outcast or a hermit.

TL;DR: Parents really can't monitor everything their kids do unless they want to go to a creepy level like keyloggers and never letting their kids out of their sight, so maybe society does have some responsibility to make sure that kids don't get exposed to stuff they shouldn't be seeing.

 

[HungoverHermaphrodite]

My own daughter's first experience with porn was at age 9 when her best friend's house next door where the older teenage brother had left up screens of porn he had been viewing (which I suspect wasn't quite accidental, so she never played there again).

Does he have a thread
Asking because purposely leaving porn somewhere a child can see it isn't just incredibly creepy, it's also a form of grooming.
Aside from that, you're not wrong. There's a thin line between monitering a kids internet for their own safety, and being creepy or ruining their social life. Personally I feel as though just having your childs social media but not interacting with it/embarassing them is a good solution. Having their username on tumblr/facebook/ect so you can periodically check on the kinds of things they're posting, and promising not to interact or embarass them, and trusting that they'll tell you if an adult is messaging them innapropriately. It's a lot of trust between both the child and parent (the child trusting the parent not to humilate them, and the parent trusting the child to tell them if something's going on), and would probably require a good relationship, but it doesn't seem like such a bad solution. Of course, there's nothing stopping your kid from making a seceret sideblog or a second account, so you'd need a kid who really trusted you not to do that.
And you can do everything right and still have a child who is groomed or has a negative experience with social media, but that doesn't mean no effort at all should be made. Minors (16-17 included) don't have the mental capacity to completely seperate fantasy from reality in the same way adults do, and an orgasm is a powerful conditioning tool. Porn doesn't effect your brain the same way other media does. Your limbic system(the primal part of your brain that's incapable of sentiant thought) is what's reacting when it comes to sexual attraction. If a 16 year old really wants to find porn, they will, but you apparently already saw the effect it had on your daughters' best friends' older brother. I'd be remiss not to at least attempt to keep a child away from porn until they were 18.

 

[Spastic Colon]

Does he have a thread
Asking because purposely leaving porn somewhere a child can see it isn't just incredibly creepy, it's also a form of grooming.
Aside from that, you're not wrong. There's a thin line between monitering a kids internet for their own safety, and being creepy or ruining their social life. Personally I feel as though just having your childs social media but not interacting with it/embarassing them is a good solution. Having their username on tumblr/facebook/ect so you can periodically check on the kinds of things they're posting, and promising not to interact or embarass them, and trusting that they'll tell you if an adult is messaging them innapropriately. It's a lot of trust between both the child and parent (the child trusting the parent not to humilate them, and the parent trusting the child to tell them if something's going on), and would probably require a good relationship, but it doesn't seem like such a bad solution. Of course, there's nothing stopping your kid from making a seceret sideblog or a second account, so you'd need a kid who really trusted you not to do that.
And you can do everything right and still have a child who is groomed or has a negative experience with social media, but that doesn't mean no effort at all should be made. Minors (16-17 included) don't have the mental capacity to completely seperate fantasy from reality in the same way adults do, and an orgasm is a powerful conditioning tool. Porn doesn't effect your brain the same way other media does. Your limbic system(the primal part of your brain that's incapable of sentiant thought) is what's reacting when it comes to sexual attraction. If a 16 year old really wants to find porn, they will, but you apparently already saw the effect it had on your daughters' best friends' older brother. I'd be remiss not to at least attempt to keep a child away from porn until they were 18.

I absolutely think parents need to do everything they can -- but there are things that could be done to lock down some of the adult content. I can remember years ago, there was a plan to put porn under a ".xxx" domain in an effort to make it easier to filter out porn and explicit sexual content, but it was shot down. There were some reasonable arguments against it, like how do you define what constitutes "adult" content but mostly it didn't happen because porn is big business. And being able to easily filter it out would hurt that business.

I honestly don't know exactly what the fix for all this would be, but I think we need to work towards finding some solutions that keeps stuff away from kids but still lets adults access more explicit material. I don't care at all what consenting adults do -- but, as you said, porn can be a grooming tool and also there is some pretty sick shit out there that kids, who don't have any context or life experience to know what normal sexual relations are, won't be able to handle. We are going to get a generation of absolute degenerates because kids are seeing some hardcore stuff that used to be only found in the back room of some sleazy adult store.

 

[HungoverHermaphrodite]

I absolutely think parents need to do everything they can -- but there are things that could be done to lock down some of the adult content. I can remember years ago, there was a plan to put porn under a ".xxx" domain in an effort to make it easier to filter out porn and explicit sexual content, but it was shot down. There were some reasonable arguments against it, like how do you define what constitutes "adult" content but mostly it didn't happen because porn is big business. And being able to easily filter it out would hurt that business.

I honestly don't know exactly what the fix for all this would be, but I think we need to work towards finding some solutions that keeps stuff away from kids but still lets adults access more explicit material. I don't care at all what consenting adults do -- but, as you said, porn can be a grooming tool and also there is some pretty sick shit out there that kids, who don't have any context or life experience to know what normal sexual relations are, won't be able to handle. We are going to get a generation of absolute degenerates because kids are seeing some hardcore stuff that used to be only found in the back room of some sleazy adult store.

It's really bizarre that was shot down. Something that's always pissed me off is that porn sites just ask if you're 18, but don't verify, so you can easily lie about your age. Hell, even in my niche discord server with like no one in it I have people DM me a picture of their liscense with everything but their birthday blurred out before I grant access to channels that have 18+ topics being discussed. At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, porn is big business. Is it possible they know how easy it is for kids to access and don't care as long as it brings in ad revenue? Probably also doesn't help that almost all major porn sites are owned by a company called mindgeek that's allegedly done some pretty shady stuff. I'm with you on the "literally could not care less about what consenting adults do", though.

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

Monitoring your kids media is often harder than you think. Most parents are not tech savvy enough to set up a good system. Just using parental control software won't work because kids figure out pretty quickly how to get around that stuff. Keeping computers in an open area only works if you actually monitor them while they are on there. Most parents don't want to have to block out 2 hours (as if kids actually keep to the 2 hour recommended limit) of the day to sit and watch their kids go online.

Plus, it isn't just computers that need to be monitored now -- smart phones and other devices give access to the internet, too, so those have to be guarded appropriately. If your kid has a cell phone, that's lots of unsupervised opportunity to access stuff if you don't have it locked down appropriately.

You can still do every single thing right with your own electronic devices and let your kid hang out at a friend's house where their parents don't know how to do this or, worse, don't want to do it. My own daughter's first experience with porn was at age 9 when her best friend's house next door where the older teenage brother had left up screens of porn he had been viewing (which I suspect wasn't quite accidental, so she never played there again). So, then you've got to worry about restricting your kids to only hang out at your house and somehow not turn them into an outcast or a hermit.

TL;DR: Parents really can't monitor everything their kids do unless they want to go to a creepy level like keyloggers and never letting their kids out of their sight, so maybe society does have some responsibility to make sure that kids don't get exposed to stuff they shouldn't be seeing.

Monitoring what your kids including teenagers do at the internet is impossible but I don’t that matters that much. Sure it’s a good idea not to give them complete free range but I think it’s more useful to make sure that internet won’t become their entire life. The difference between a drug and a poison is dose after all. Encourage or if necessary even forse them have offline hobbies, spend time with family, have a part time job, go on a trip with spotty access to internet and so on. This will give them perspective and brake from what manipulation might be happening.

 

[Aria]

https://archive.li/nHyR3

so basically a nomap is a pedophile no matter how matter they try to dress it up.

https://archive.li/Ln23E
lol

https://archive.li/y84wA

but i thought no maps don't act on their urges.

 

[Token Weeaboo]

View attachment 983600
https://archive.li/Ln23E
lol

View attachment 983616
https://archive.li/y84wA

but i thought no maps don't act on their urges.

The ovens are ablaze waiting for him to act.

 

[Aria]

View attachment 868818
View attachment 868819
View attachment 868817
View attachment 868821

Spoiler: What a 'sexual revolutionary' is

View attachment 868823

Twitter / Account Suspended

From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary.

twitter.com

Twitter / Account Suspended

From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary.

twitter.com

now this is someone that definitely deserves to be killed.

 

[Hal]

View attachment 983599
https://archive.li/nHyR3

so basically a nomap is a pedophile no matter how matter they try to dress it up.


View attachment 983600
https://archive.li/Ln23E
lol

View attachment 983616
https://archive.li/y84wA

but i thought no maps don't act on their urges.

That chara dude got suspended off twitter today. Hopefully he won't ever be near any kids.

 

[Loopy Lew]

We live in a world where people openly admit and praise being a pedo. We. Live. In. A. Society.

 

[Great Dane]

that one hoe from next door on Twitter

“#nomappositivity the nomaps deserve love and support for being able to come out as what they are! Before you hate me here's what I mean: Nomaps don't hurt kids. They are attracted to children and mabye people their age too, but don't act on the younger ones! Super proud💕”

twitter.com

Neko boi on Twitter

“#nomappositivity the nomaps deserve love and support for being able to come out as what they are! Before you hate me here's what I mean: Nomaps don't hurt kids. They are attracted to children and mabye people their age too, but don't act on the younger ones! Super proud💕”

web.archive.org

Faun Cervine on Twitter

“More detailed about me: · I'm polyamorous and pansexual · I have autism, ADHD, dyscalculia, and anxiety · I am a non-offending MAP who is also non-exclusive and anti-contact · My aoa for minors is roughly 8-15 · I love shotacon and cub yiff 🚫 Antis and pro-c's do not interact”

twitter.com

Faun Cervine on Twitter

“More detailed about me: · I'm polyamorous and pansexual · I have autism, ADHD, dyscalculia, and anxiety · I am a non-offending MAP who is also non-exclusive and anti-contact · My aoa for minors is roughly 8-15 · I love shotacon and cub yiff 🚫 Antis and pro-c's do not interact”

web.archive.org

Twitter / Account Suspended

From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary.

twitter.com

🕸️ ᴅᴇᴋᴜ 🕸️ on Twitter

“🌸💜🌊 Bisexual MAP flag 🌊💜🌸 #mappositivity”

web.archive.org

 

[Unexpected Genitals]

Skedaddle skedids it's bad to touch kids

 

[Hanamura]

The reply to the retweet and like ratio is so funny. Pretty much everyone in the replies is telling this pedo how disgusting they are.

 

[Aria]

Labeling yourself as a no-map doesnt soften pedophila it still makes you a pedo.

If I was a no map and knew that having sexual thoughts about kids was bad,and jacking of to lolicon as well.

I'll go get help and not feed myself into my harmful desires.it's unhealthy.

At the end I believe that most of the map and no map accounts are trolls, and that some genuinely believe what they are saying.

 

[{o}P II]

Ever notice how all these people use UwU anime profile pics?

Imagine what they look like irl

 

[The Last Stand]

Something I was thinking, if nomaps or whatever they call themselves want "love", can't they just date each other? Leave children out of this.