- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
But Empire wasn't and would have given it, had it been a democracy
I can't follow this logic. It's just too much for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But Empire wasn't and would have given it, had it been a democracy
Yes, if we are talking about what rape legally was in sane societies. But there's also an act of rape. Slut can be raped in that it is act, but that is no crime but a good deed in sane societies.
You don't know history. Raping a slut was an accepted way to make them see sense in any sane society.In sane societies, rape is rape and illegal.
Yes, you read it right. In sane societies animals were given more protection than sluts. This is why they were sane.........If I'm reading this post right, did you just say that raping a slut is considered a *good* thing in a sane society? Or is this such a shit post that I'm just not comprehending what the hell you're saying?
This is an odd use of the word "sense."You don't know history. Raping a slut was an accepted way to make them see sense in any sane society.
In sane societies, rape is rape and illegal.
1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.1) You may see yourself as a intelligent man (although everyone else sees otherwise) but you're NOT a provider at all. Thus in "pre-feminism" days you'd still be a loser.
2) If the purpose of rape is to make intelligent men, then did your dad rape your mom to make an "intelligent man" like you?
You don't know history. Raping a slut was an accepted way to make them see sense in any sane society.
Why? Anybody with any sense isn't a slut.This is an odd use of the word "sense."
I explained that sluts can't be legally raped.You know historically rape was still pretty illegal in all societies.
In medieval times, you'd be married at 13. Think of all the sweet 12-year-old poontang you'd be getting.1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.
........If I'm reading this post right, did you just say that raping a slut is considered a *good* thing in a sane society?
1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.
2) Strawman.
Not really. Scum rape. Human beings interact and have consent. If all you want is to bang, there are one night stands and hookers. Not sure why you get so hard over rape.I don't want or need your help. Your help is seduction. Rape is better than that.
1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.
No, not ugly. Just don't want anybody to say anything good or bad about how I look or sound. Women should choose men over how much they can provide and nothing else...So the reason why you won't post a video is because you are ugly?
Because that's what I collect from your response
No, I meant that rape doesn't go along with the word "sense."Why? Anybody with any sense isn't a slut.
I explained that sluts can't be legally raped.
You don't know history. Raping a slut was an accepted way to make them see sense in any sane society.
You are hittin that jenkem really hard dude.1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.
2) Strawman.
Because when feminism started rape was still abhorrent to women still they were mostly attracted to intelligent men, providers.
But after feminism destroyed this and made them worship ape cock propaganda against rape would be gone by now if it hadn't begun to serve a different purpose - to make intelligent men, whom women now don't want to reproduce with, expect consent and thus prove they're genetic losers (currently).
Why would that logically follow? It doesn't. Feminists are morons and don't even understand the implications of their own ideology. https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/
You made women like rapists not because of rape, but because not understanding consent means that the man is stupid, and thus desirable in a seduction based society. Whoever uses seduction is scum of the earth.