Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, if we are talking about what rape legally was in sane societies. But there's also an act of rape. Slut can be raped in that it is act, but that is no crime but a good deed in sane societies.

........If I'm reading this post right, did you just say that raping a slut is considered a *good* thing in a sane society? Or is this such a shit post that I'm just not comprehending what the hell you're saying?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saney
Image1.png
 
In sane societies, rape is rape and illegal.
You don't know history. Raping a slut was an accepted way to make them see sense in any sane society.

........If I'm reading this post right, did you just say that raping a slut is considered a *good* thing in a sane society? Or is this such a shit post that I'm just not comprehending what the hell you're saying?
Yes, you read it right. In sane societies animals were given more protection than sluts. This is why they were sane.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In sane societies, rape is rape and illegal.
1) You may see yourself as a intelligent man (although everyone else sees otherwise) but you're NOT a provider at all. Thus in "pre-feminism" days you'd still be a loser.
2) If the purpose of rape is to make intelligent men, then did your dad rape your mom to make an "intelligent man" like you?
1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.
2) Strawman.
 
1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.
In medieval times, you'd be married at 13. Think of all the sweet 12-year-old poontang you'd be getting.
 
1) You're missing the chronology. In a pre-feminist society I'd be married at 18. I am not a provider now because women hate it. But if I could get a wife I'd start providing tomorrow.
2) Strawman.

Oh look, another red herring.

Also, in a pre-feminist society, no one would marry you because you have nothing, you are nothing, and all you'll ever be is nothing.
 
Because when feminism started rape was still abhorrent to women still they were mostly attracted to intelligent men, providers.
But after feminism destroyed this and made them worship ape cock propaganda against rape would be gone by now if it hadn't begun to serve a different purpose - to make intelligent men, whom women now don't want to reproduce with, expect consent and thus prove they're genetic losers (currently).


Why would that logically follow? It doesn't. Feminists are morons and don't even understand the implications of their own ideology. https://caamib.wordpress.com/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/

You made women like rapists not because of rape, but because not understanding consent means that the man is stupid, and thus desirable in a seduction based society. Whoever uses seduction is scum of the earth.


Ahh, I see.

When exactly did this destruction of feminism begin? Second wave? Third? Who were the key figures involved? There have always been key figures involved with the progression of feminism, but I don't seem to recall anyone saying that women should only sleep with apes with low IQs, or to have illegitimate kids with as many apes as possible (by the way, can you give me a source for that '99% of children are illegitimate' statistic? Thanks!). If you could cite some figures within the feminist movement who do openly espouse such things it would go a long way towards validating your argument n the eyes of the forum. I daresay you're not interested in validating it to us, though.

Incidentally, I completely agree that there are a lot of feminists who are morons. It's pretty hilarious when people talk about feminism and they don't even know what it is.

I didn't actually do anything of the sort. I am very anti-rape, whether the victim is female or male. It's an equally serious crime. There are a lot of feminists here and I'd actually find it fascinating if you could find just one who is pro-rape. As a feminist, I believe in equality where possible for men and women. That's all it means. There's no one definition of feminism, and while a lot of women these days are missing the point and mistakenly believe feminism is about hating men and glorifying women, that's never been what feminism is about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back