Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
...Really mother fucker?

Nobody needs to be a doctor to see you've got problems.

You're not claiming I have problems. You're claiming I have mental illnesses, which you can't claim online. Not even if you're a doctor.

Sounds like you got your ass handed to you by a thug. Your girlie saw that he didn't act like you and ran off with him.

You seem to believe thugs are some tough machos. They're actually pussified weaklings.


Yeah, where would people get that idea...

Considering your behavior on here tonight I'd say you're actually angry that you're not doing the raping.

No, the idea is correct, it's just that I have every reason to be.

I am angry that I am not raping sluts, but my point is that in a feminist society women have been turned into monstrous sluts who just want rape.

So how would they be chaste pre-marriage and hookers?
Obviously hookers wouldn't get married.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have you ever read Elliot Rodger manifesto? if so can you share some thoughts on it?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coldgrip
So what? It only applied to women to make them unable to be sluts. Boys had a lot of sex with prostitutes before marriage.

And if you really, really want to have sex, you can do that now.

Unless you're dirt fucking poor and gigantic enough of a pussy that you're afraid of getting arrested for it. Speaking of which, what's the legal status of prostitution in your country?

I don't want anything from modern Western women but their suffering.

8c88dbf757091dc3c2718face7f8dc385e497a75f4e13b1d721a1f4337887780.jpg


All I see here are your delusions, which have nothing to do with what I'm saying.

Exactly what are you referring to that you would consider delusions? And why am I the one who should claim ownership of these said delusions?
 
It's just another modernist buzzword. It has nothing to do with actual crimes. It's merely a part of an abuse industry. In sane societies you had rape and you knew what it was - a property crime against a woman's chastity or father/husband. Nothing else existed nor should it.
So would rape toward a man not really be some property crime then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN
Have you ever read Elliot Rodger manifesto? if so can you share some thoughts on it?
I haven't read it. Thought it might be triggering for me. I read bits of it.

I think he was right about most things but didn't see the core of the problem, which is described in the July 22 article. Had he done so he might have gone abroad to find himself some sex and later a good non-feminist wife. Instead he wanted Santa Barbara blonde cumdumpsters, which was insane. He was never the type of moron needed to fuck that scum.
 
You really need to read the whole post. I can't explain all of it all over again.
"I can't be bothered to explain myself to you"

Also, why do you have a problem with females having sexual freedom?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saney
It's just another modernist buzzword. It has nothing to do with actual crimes. It's merely a part of an abuse industry. In sane societies you had rape and you knew what it was - a property crime against a woman's chastity or father/husband. Nothing else existed nor should it.

Women are not property, an it's just pathetic that you even think that.

Your a fucking degenerate.
 
Have you ever read Elliot Rodger manifesto? if so can you share some thoughts on it?

It's his Holy Qur'an. He bases his life around it, the way Juggalos base their lives around listening to ICP, painting their faces with semen, and drinking industrial size containers of Faygo.
 
But then they wouldn't be chaste pre-marriage. Are you just going to have a lottery at birth where you say "ok numbers 14, 35, 47, and 49, you get to be prostitutes." I don't think parents would be ok with that.

Yes, prostitutes wouldn't be chaste pre-marriage so they wouldn't marry. What's the problem with this?

Also, nobody ever designated somebody to be a prostitute, unless they were specifically bred for it. Economic and personality factors decided it. Not all women want to marry. Some like being prostitutes.
 
You really need to read the whole post. I can't explain all of it all over again.
I like to see how your post would be lectured towards a class filled with adults. Really, it would be nice to see just what is wrong with it. You can't even try to put in some condensed version to make it understandable for others?

It wasn't a property crime in sane socities, no. It also wasn't seen as seriously as a rape of a woman. I do think men can be raped though, but only by other men.
So it wouldn't really matter to you how a person was raped, whether by force or by intoxication? Do really think a man can only be raped by another man? It doesn't take one's gender to rape another, not when there are other methods.
 
Yes, prostitutes wouldn't be chaste pre-marriage so they wouldn't marry. What's the problem with this?

Also, nobody ever designated somebody to be a prostitute, unless they were specifically bred for it. Economic and personality factors decided it. Not all women want to marry. Some like being prostitutes.

Does this mean that women in the sex industry are incapable of being married? Why is that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back