Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
the difference is what's better for them. but could be argued that women are always slaves in a way - to their sheepish natures
Its a little hard to believe you have a woman's best interest in mind when you seem to only see us as tools for sexual gratification.

Also, I'm really confused how you can be so opposed to premarital sex yet approve of prostitution, especially with a welfare system placed upon the system.
 
the difference is what's better for them. but could be argued that women are always slaves in a way - to their sheepish natures

I find it rather amusing that you seem to think that you are an expert on women, when clearly all you want to do is fuck your own mother.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saney
Its a little hard to believe you have a woman's best interest in mind when you seem to only see us as tools for sexual gratification.

Also, I'm really confused how you can be so opposed to premarital sex yet approve of prostitution, especially with a welfare system placed upon the system.
i don't. i see you as mothers, wives, teachers... it's those thugs you worship who see you as public urinals.
premarital sex is for non prostitutes.
 
Lolololol. All parts of movements and forces which were becoming dominant or struggled for it. anybody who reads the links will see.
Oh great, if they support the established order, they aren't conservative paragons of womanhood, but "always slaves in a way - to their sheepish nature". If they support a revolutionary movement, they do so, because the movement is trying to influence and change the world.
You are aware that this fucking ridiculous?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arctic
At this point, (after ignoring it three times) I don't think you even want to try and have a legit discussion with someone like me. So, instead of making you read my other question about how women don't actually like being raped, I'll change to this question.

@Holden
You claimed in one of your very first posts here that your parents were murderous and that you beat them because they did not help you. You also claim that in some states/worlds/countries it would be illegal for them to do what they did to you. You understand that's not true right? Or can you at least provide a name to a country in which your parents would be murdered for not providing you with a "prostitute scam" in the apartment they owned? Sex is not something you need to survive... know how I know that? There have been hundreds/thousands of years where men AND women went their whole life without having sex (monks, nuns, priests, even normal citizens, etc). Not getting your child laid is not against the law anywhere in the world; and despite what you claim, this lack of action on your parents part did NOT kill you.

edit: adding source to murderous parents should be killed:
Quote: "4. When, in righteous indignation, I finally attacked those beasts [his parents, for not getting him laid] and managed to beat the shit out of them I was the one that was reported to the police, and not these murderous animals. Only good they ever did was that they later refused to testify against me.

In any country with a normal legal system sensitive to needs of incels these criminals would be prosecuted long ago and in some countries their crimes would be punished by the death penalty. However, here they’re allowed to run free and go on commiting their heinous crimes. Though the police have been informed about their attempts to murder their child they haven’t done anything I was actually threatened with arrest for consuming police resources.

Their murderous behavior goes on. For how long, I ask?"
 
Oh great, if they support the established order, they aren't conservative paragons of womanhood, but "always slaves in a way - to their sheepish nature". If they support a revolutionary movement, they do so, because the movement is trying to influence and change the world.
You are aware that this fucking ridiculous?
The real bravery would be to do what Rosa Parks did in 1820.
The remaining three examples were either of dominant things (french revolution, spanish socialists) or forces that fought to gain power (that goldman cunt)
 
Lolololol. All parts of movements and forces which were becoming dominant or struggled for it. anybody who reads the links will see.
Then we can amend, "Women always consent to what is dominant," to, "Women always consent to what is dominant or struggle against what is dominant."
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Arctic
macie - i will when i get some rest. please message me on my profile so i can find your posts easier.

Then we can amend, "Women always consent to what is dominant," to, "Women always consent to what is dominant or struggle against what is dominant."
The real bravery would be to do what Rosa Parks did in 1820.
The remaining three examples were either of dominant things (french revolution, spanish socialists) or forces that fought to gain power (that goldman cunt)
 
But there's still discussion on whether or not he was the sole author, or if his wife contributed to that essay.

i don't. i see you as mothers, wives, teachers... it's those thugs you worship who see you as public urinals.
premarital sex is for non prostitutes.
What about women who don't want to be mothers or wives? Do you feel a woman who isn't those two things is a dumb slut not doing her job right?

Also, please elaborate on 'premarital sex is for non prostitutes'. I'm not a prostitute, can I have sex? If not, why?

The real bravery would be to do what Rosa Parks did in 1820.
The remaining three examples were either of dominant things (french revolution, spanish socialists) or forces that fought to gain power (that goldman cunt)
What fucking buses would she have protested on in 1820?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The real bravery would be to do what Rosa Parks did in 1820.
The remaining three examples were either of dominant things (french revolution, spanish socialists) or forces that fought to gain power (that goldman cunt)
Somehow it gladdens my heart to know that you hate Emma Goldman.

Can you precisely define your usage of the word "dominant"?
 
The real bravery would be to do what Rosa Parks did in 1820.
Hooray for historical knowledge.

The remaining three examples were either of dominant things (french revolution, spanish socialists) or forces that fought to gain power (that goldman cunt)
Well, that's the thing about being involved in politics to change the world according to your beliefs. Why is it okay for rape apes to do so and not for sluts?

Edit: typo
 
macie - i will when i get some rest. please message me on my profile so i can find your posts easier.
No, sorry. I do not wish to post this on your profile where no one will get to see your brilliant response. But it's ok. I kinda already know what you'll say so it's fine. Basically:

To Question 1: You are obviously a slut so you liked it and you are just in denial

To Question 2: Sex is needed in a way that humans need physical contact. They were denying me this. I would have become suicidal after a while of being depressed. So because I COULD have committed suicide (but I didn't) my parents were murderous.

Got yo crazy down to a T. I should start answering questions for you so you can get some sleep. God knows I won't after the shit I've seen today.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
But there's still discussion on whether or not he was the sole author, or if his wife contributed to that essay.


What about women who don't want to be mothers or wives? Do you feel a woman who isn't those two things is a dumb slut not doing her job right?

Also, please elaborate on 'premarital sex is for non prostitutes'. I'm not a prostitute, can I have sex? If not, why?


Kind of a weird statement with that last little gem, no?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back