- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why wouldn't that work? How do you provide a citation that somebody is a scumbag or anything else?No you're not, you fucking incompetent jackass.
Your definition of 'scumbag' is "someone who acts like a scumbag".
If I have to explain to you why that doesn't work, then-
gaygun - you're a moron who posts ED articles whose only goal (and even then they fail) is to lie and defame so no point in talking to you
Why wouldn't that work? How do you provide a citation that somebody is a scumbag or anything else?
The second part of your reply, the last one I got to, claimed seducers are likeable. Why? They're the most unlikable creatures on the planet, worse even than modern western women. It seems we can't agree on these things so what's the point? Just like there is nothing that's good about making somebody smile. It is a tiny benefit with no discernible long time effects or consequences.
So you're saying I teamed up with his wife and we planned my rape as well as the rape of several other girls? Sounds legit.I am not assuming that every rapist is an honest and good man. It's crazy sentences like these that just show you're either insane or phony.I constantly said they're thugs, but thugs women adore.
As for your claim that he abused her, maybe you believe he abused her by being a decent, civilized person? Cause that is the greatest abuse to modern women. So you decided, with the help of his wife, to put him away, as this would enable his wife to start/go on with a trampage much easier?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/begging-the-questionWhy wouldn't that work? How do you provide a citation that somebody is a scumbag or anything else?
Excuse me sir are you lost. Also: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominemgaygun - you're a moron who posts ED articles whose only goal (and even then they fail) is to lie and defame so no point in talking to you
there is nothing that's good about making somebody smile. It is a tiny benefit with no discernible long time effects or consequences.
Short term positives are still good.Just like there is nothing that's good about making somebody smile. It is a tiny benefit with no discernible long time effects or consequences.
The second part of your reply, the last one I got to, claimed seducers are likeable. Why? They're the most unlikable creatures on the planet, worse even than modern western women.
It seems we can't agree on these things so what's the point?
Just like there is nothing that's good about making somebody smile. It is a tiny benefit with no discernible long time effects or consequences.
Look at you, you little ray of sunshine.
I do understand the difference. But neither of us can even agree on what a scumbag is. I mean, we could use the same definition but we obviously see it differently. So, again, what is the point?That's why I asked for citation, Holden. Because you're stating your opinion about seduction as if it's irrefutable scientific fact. You do understand the difference between fact and opinion right? One is a thing that can be proved, and the other is a thing that hits your tingle button in your adorable parrot heart.
I'd recommend some articles that describe my life and what brought me to this but it is a waste of time with a moron like you. I mean, if you wanna know what led me to this by asking these idiotic questions you're already a moron, not to mention everything else.What fills a soul with so much bile.
I'd recommend some articles that describe my life and what brought me to this but it is a waste of time with a moron like you.
First I will give the world what it adores.
I do understand the difference. But neither of us can even agree on what a scumbag is.
So you're going to take the coward's way out and hang yourself before you go to prison?
i want men and women to marry even if they never saw each other before.
Seduction is bad since it means selling yourself as a viable evolutionary choice based on nothing at all but being an obnoxious scumbag. It says nothing about how fair you are, how trusty you are, how moral you are, how much you provide, how well can you take care of a woman and her kids, how well you can raise the kids, how well can you do anything at all.
I do understand the difference. But neither of us can even agree on what a scumbag is. I mean, we could use the same definition but we obviously see it differently. So, again, what is the point?
And don't worry, I won't kill myself just yet. That would make it easy. First I will give the world what it adores.
And don't worry, I won't kill myself just yet. That would make it easy. First I will give the world what it adores.
They should be decided by that but not prearranged. A society in women are attracted to those things and disgusted by seducers is enough. Arranged marriages existed in the past but weren't always the norm. What was a norm in every sane society was women were attracted to things you mention as they saw it like they see seduction, scumbaggery, rape, stupidity, backstabbing, burping, hitting people, maiming women etc today - attractive features. And since arranged marriages usually had some economic or political (often both) goal when they happened women weren't unhappy or felt forced. they were just arranged into something they'd likely pick anyway.So marriages should be prearranged and decided by a resumé, school transcripts, bank statements, character references and credit score?
Sounds too much like a job to me.